Janel
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,941
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1971 · 424 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 12,023since 1933
Janel over time
Rank among girls' names. Janel has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 | — | |
| 2024 | #6,932 | 16 | — | |
| 2023 | #6,409 | 18 | — | |
| 2022 | #7,631 | 14 | — | |
| 2021 | #5,398 | 23 | — | |
| 2020 | #4,757 | 27 | — | |
| 2019 | #5,041 | 26 | — | |
| 2018 | #5,454 | 23 | — | |
| 2017 | #4,384 | 32 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,083 | 36 | — | |
| 2015 | #4,488 | 31 | — | |
| 2014 | #3,925 | 38 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,703 | 41 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,216 | 35 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,659 | 42 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,624 | 43 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,779 | 64 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,663 | 69 | — | |
| 2007 | #3,047 | 57 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,017 | 56 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,787 | 59 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,240 | 78 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,970 | 92 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,142 | 78 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,765 | 101 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,801 | 96 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,580 | 106 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,350 | 130 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,449 | 114 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,133 | 160 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,090 | 163 | — | |
| 1994 | #977 | 189 | — | |
| 1993 | #930 | 203 | — | |
| 1992 | #885 | 223 | — | |
| 1991 | #847 | 236 | — | |
| 1990 | #966 | 194 | — | |
| 1989 | #800 | 238 | #6,941 | 6 |
| 1988 | #734 | 255 | — | |
| 1987 | #666 | 280 | — | |
| 1986 | #750 | 231 | — | |
| 1985 | #863 | 185 | — | |
| 1984 | #778 | 207 | — | |
| 1983 | #726 | 228 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #636 | 283 | — | |
| 1981 | #568 | 324 | — | |
| 1980 | #507 | 397 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #530 | 359 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #475 | 413 | — | |
| 1977 | #491 | 387 | — | |
| 1976 | #514 | 346 | — | |
| 1975 | #513 | 346 | — | |
| 1974 | #545 | 310 | — | |
| 1973 | #512 | 333 | — | |
| 1972 | #495 | 357 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #470 | 424 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #508 | 386 | — | |
| 1969 | #559 | 312 | — | |
| 1968 | #607 | 252 | — | |
| 1967 | #723 | 184 | — | |
| 1966 | #952 | 114 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,019 | 105 | — | |
| 1964 | #917 | 130 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,043 | 106 | — | |
| 1962 | #967 | 121 | — | |
| 1961 | #908 | 142 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,025 | 110 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,023 | 107 | — | |
| 1958 | #988 | 110 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,033 | 103 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,105 | 87 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,087 | 86 | — | |
| 1954 | #958 | 102 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,082 | 79 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,028 | 83 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,019 | 83 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,076 | 73 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,154 | 62 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,223 | 55 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,461 | 41 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,228 | 18 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,458 | 13 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,511 | 13 | — | |
| 1943 | #3,493 | 8 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,817 | 11 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,096 | 16 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,736 | 10 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,940 | 9 | — | |
| 1937 | #2,940 | 9 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,386 | 12 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,356 | 29 | — | |
| 1934 | #3,802 | 6 | — | |
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 | — | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Janel! It came in at #4,218, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1933–1934, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Janel is popular in 1968
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Dakota#150 · 1 in 583
- Hawaii#222 · 1 in 762
- Minnesota#251 · 1 in 1,654
- Wisconsin#291 · 1 in 2,326
- Nebraska#299 · 1 in 1,987
Best ever in a state: #101 in North Dakota, 1961.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #150 | 7 | 1 in 583 |
| Hawaii | #222 | 6 | 1 in 762 |
| Minnesota | #251 | 17 | 1 in 1,654 |
| Wisconsin | #291 | 14 | 1 in 2,326 |
| Nebraska | #299 | 5 | 1 in 1,987 |
| Iowa | #303 | 9 | 1 in 2,233 |
| Colorado | #313 | 9 | 1 in 1,729 |
| Washington | #397 | 9 | 1 in 2,613 |
| Pennsylvania | #462 | 18 | 1 in 4,679 |
| Virginia | #512 | 6 | 1 in 5,492 |
| Maryland | #515 | 5 | 1 in 5,056 |
| Ohio | #522 | 14 | 1 in 5,901 |
| Indiana | #527 | 7 | 1 in 5,685 |
| Missouri | #532 | 6 | 1 in 5,481 |
| Michigan | #541 | 12 | 1 in 5,788 |
| California | #633 | 27 | 1 in 5,696 |
| Illinois | #635 | 12 | 1 in 6,973 |
| Florida | #686 | 6 | 1 in 7,041 |
| New Jersey | #741 | 5 | 1 in 9,652 |
| New York | #966 | 10 | 1 in 13,624 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Janel
- 3,985 spots since 2024 (#6,932 → #10,917)
- 6,160 spots since 2020 (#4,757 → #10,917)
- 6,429 spots since 2015 (#4,488 → #10,917)
- Biggest jump: 229 spots in 1967 (#952 → #723)
- Biggest drop: 166 spots in 1990 (#800 → #966)
- Debuted 1933
- Peaked 1971 at #470 (424 births)
- Births halved by 1984, 13 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 34 yrs · run 1966–1994
- Highest: 1 in 3,709 girls born in 1978 were named Janel (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 200,908 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #470 in 1971, was only 1 in 3,924 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 30.4% of all girls named Janel (3,661) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 80 | #1,356 (1935) | #2,911 |
| 1940s | 244 | #1,154 (1949) | #2,294 |
| 1950s | 913 | #958 (1954) | #1,040 |
| 1960s | 1,576 | #559 (1969) | #872 |
| 1970s | 3,661 | #470 (1971) | #505 |
| 1980s | 2,628 | #507 (1980) | #703 |
| 1990s | 1,718 | #847 (1991) | #1,121 |
| 2000s | 750 | #1,765 (2001) | #2,421 |
| 2010s | 347 | #3,624 (2010) | #4,258 |
| 2020s | 106 | #4,757 (2020) | #7,007 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Janel in 1968
Top girls' names in 1968
More about 1968
girls
1,640,389 girls got a published name in 1968; 1 in 6,509 of them was named Janel, which outranked 92.6% of the 8,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.