Janeth
#4,352 for girls in 2025, 32 births
- Peak · girls
- 2002 · 170 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,792since 1915
Janeth over time
Rank among girls' names. Janeth has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,352 | 32 |
| 2024 | #2,694 | 64 |
| 2023 | #3,476 | 45 |
| 2022 | #2,346 | 79 |
| 2021 | #3,157 | 51 |
| 2020 | #3,338 | 46 |
| 2019 | #3,499 | 44 |
| 2018 | #2,810 | 60 |
| 2017 | #2,530 | 70 |
| 2016 | #2,385 | 78 |
| 2015 | #2,138 | 89 |
| 2014 | #2,154 | 88 |
| 2013 | #1,968 | 100 |
| 2012 | #2,028 | 95 |
| 2011 | #1,840 | 109 |
| 2010 | #2,296 | 83 |
| 2009 | #1,956 | 106 |
| 2008 | #1,597 | 142 |
| 2007 | #1,537 | 149 |
| 2006 | #1,359 | 170 |
| 2005 | #1,301 | 171 |
| 2004 | #1,264 | 170 |
| 2003 | #1,212 | 175 |
| 2002 | #1,197 | 170 |
| 2001 | #1,427 | 132 |
| 2000 | #1,431 | 128 |
| 1999 | #1,515 | 113 |
| 1998 | #1,675 | 95 |
| 1997 | #1,490 | 110 |
| 1996 | #1,583 | 98 |
| 1995 | #1,562 | 97 |
| 1994 | #1,770 | 82 |
| 1993 | #1,529 | 102 |
| 1992 | #1,530 | 102 |
| 1991 | #1,492 | 105 |
| 1990 | #1,701 | 86 |
| 1989 | #1,998 | 63 |
| 1988 | #2,867 | 36 |
| 1987 | #3,257 | 28 |
| 1986 | #2,724 | 35 |
| 1985 | #3,730 | 22 |
| 1984 | #3,613 | 22 |
| 1983 | #4,109 | 18 |
| 1982 | #4,167 | 18 |
| 1981 | #3,253 | 26 |
| 1980 | #4,327 | 17 |
| 1979 | #5,092 | 13 |
| 1978 | #4,242 | 16 |
| 1977 | #4,942 | 13 |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 |
| 1972 | #4,300 | 13 |
| 1971 | #5,136 | 10 |
| 1970 | #4,492 | 12 |
| 1969 | #3,318 | 17 |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,845 | 12 |
| 1966 | #4,866 | 8 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 |
| 1963 | #5,296 | 7 |
| 1962 | #4,533 | 9 |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 |
| 1960 | #4,437 | 9 |
| 1959 | #3,436 | 13 |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 |
| 1956 | #3,910 | 10 |
| 1955 | #2,635 | 18 |
| 1954 | #3,157 | 13 |
| 1953 | #2,595 | 17 |
| 1952 | #2,126 | 23 |
| 1951 | #2,245 | 20 |
| 1950 | #1,911 | 25 |
| 1949 | #2,274 | 19 |
| 1948 | #1,901 | 25 |
| 1947 | #1,722 | 31 |
| 1946 | #2,482 | 15 |
| 1945 | #1,418 | 32 |
| 1944 | #2,287 | 15 |
| 1943 | #1,591 | 28 |
| 1942 | #1,471 | 31 |
| 1941 | #1,696 | 22 |
| 1940 | #1,965 | 17 |
| 1939 | #1,881 | 18 |
| 1938 | #1,752 | 20 |
| 1937 | #1,999 | 16 |
| 1936 | #2,263 | 13 |
| 1935 | #2,439 | 12 |
| 1934 | #3,802 | 6 |
| 1933 | #2,161 | 14 |
| 1932 | #3,274 | 8 |
| 1931 | #2,105 | 15 |
| 1930 | #1,875 | 19 |
| 1929 | #2,301 | 14 |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 |
| 1927 | #2,433 | 14 |
| 1926 | #2,708 | 12 |
| 1925 | #2,617 | 13 |
| 1924 | #1,328 | 37 |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 |
| 1921 | #4,023 | 7 |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | #4,814 | 5 |
| 1918 | #3,024 | 10 |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Janeth! It came in at #3,134, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1916–1917, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Janeth is popular in 1992
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#665 · 1 in 4,744
- Arizona#691 · 1 in 4,365
- California#711 · 1 in 5,464
- Illinois#1,426 · 1 in 15,056
Best ever in a state: #315 in Arizona, 2002.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #665 | 29 | 1 in 4,744 |
| Arizona | #691 | 6 | 1 in 4,365 |
| California | #711 | 47 | 1 in 5,464 |
| Illinois | #1,426 | 5 | 1 in 15,056 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Janeth
- 1,658 spots since 2024 (#2,694 → #4,352)
- 1,014 spots since 2020 (#3,338 → #4,352)
- 2,214 spots since 2015 (#2,138 → #4,352)
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 2002 at #1,197 (170 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 10,441 girls born in 2003 were named Janeth (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 50,227 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,197 in 2002, was only 1 in 10,570 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 31.6% of all girls named Janeth (1,513) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 23 | #3,024 (1918) | #3,657 |
| 1920s | 113 | #1,328 (1924) | #3,280 |
| 1930s | 141 | #1,752 (1938) | #2,355 |
| 1940s | 235 | #1,418 (1945) | #1,881 |
| 1950s | 157 | #1,911 (1950) | #3,060 |
| 1960s | 93 | #3,318 (1969) | #4,321 |
| 1970s | 109 | #4,242 (1978) | #5,396 |
| 1980s | 285 | #1,998 (1989) | #3,405 |
| 1990s | 990 | #1,490 (1997) | #1,585 |
| 2000s | 1,513 | #1,197 (2002) | #1,428 |
| 2010s | 816 | #1,840 (2011) | #2,365 |
| 2020s | 317 | #2,346 (2022) | #3,227 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Janeth in 1992
Top girls' names in 1992
More about 1992
girls
1,843,931 girls got a published name in 1992; 1 in 18,078 of them was named Janeth, which outranked 90.2% of the 15,610 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,523Jamesha103
- #1,523Mirna103
- #1,523Pa103
- #1,530Janeth102
- #1,530Aria102
- #1,530Chanell102
- #1,530Cherelle102
- #1,537Aleah101
- #1,537Andrew101
- #1,537Cheri101
Tied with 6 names at #1,530; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.