Janie
- #1,326 for girls in 2025, 168 births
- Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
- Given to girls 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1882 · 134 births
- Debut · girls
- 96 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 75,598since 1880
Janie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Janie has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,326 | 168 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,536 | 139 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,544 | 138 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,456 | 152 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,630 | 128 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,781 | 111 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,528 | 141 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,677 | 124 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,636 | 132 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,456 | 158 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,388 | 170 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,391 | 165 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,496 | 148 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,408 | 163 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,577 | 138 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,456 | 155 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,228 | 203 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,250 | 201 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,402 | 170 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,281 | 186 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,054 | 226 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,038 | 223 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,126 | 195 | — | |
| 2002 | #946 | 236 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,001 | 214 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,014 | 208 | — | |
| 1999 | #991 | 207 | — | |
| 1998 | #971 | 210 | — | |
| 1997 | #858 | 238 | — | |
| 1996 | #862 | 231 | — | |
| 1995 | #800 | 248 | — | |
| 1994 | #730 | 285 | — | |
| 1993 | #762 | 270 | — | |
| 1992 | #710 | 304 | — | |
| 1991 | #671 | 321 | — | |
| 1990 | #667 | 323 | — | |
| 1989 | #688 | 294 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #626 | 317 | — | |
| 1987 | #689 | 268 | #5,459 | 7 |
| 1986 | #624 | 297 | — | |
| 1985 | #626 | 299 | — | |
| 1984 | #589 | 306 | — | |
| 1983 | #579 | 309 | — | |
| 1982 | #550 | 335 | #3,966 | 10 |
| 1981 | #550 | 338 | — | |
| 1980 | #583 | 316 | — | |
| 1979 | #558 | 330 | — | |
| 1978 | #569 | 303 | — | |
| 1977 | #521 | 353 | — | |
| 1976 | #498 | 360 | #3,724 | 9 |
| 1975 | #509 | 351 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #497 | 354 | #3,837 | 8 |
| 1973 | #468 | 389 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #435 | 441 | #4,441 | 6 |
| 1971 | #452 | 454 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #456 | 475 | #4,230 | 6 |
| 1969 | #432 | 498 | #3,935 | 6 |
| 1968 | #429 | 490 | — | |
| 1967 | #390 | 554 | — | |
| 1966 | #372 | 595 | #2,986 | 8 |
| 1965 | #365 | 620 | — | |
| 1964 | #347 | 752 | #3,601 | 6 |
| 1963 | #301 | 940 | — | |
| 1962 | #299 | 952 | #3,305 | 7 |
| 1961 | #284 | 1,049 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #274 | 1,082 | #2,535 | 11 |
| 1959 | #262 | 1,128 | — | |
| 1958 | #246 | 1,215 | — | |
| 1957 | #235 | 1,304 | #3,024 | 8 |
| 1956 | #215 | 1,410 | — | |
| 1955 | #209 | 1,483 | #3,886 | 5 |
| 1954 | #205 | 1,492 | — | |
| 1953 | #197 | 1,578 | #3,798 | 5 |
| 1952 | #189 | 1,569 | #3,734 | 5 |
| 1951 | #176 | 1,707 | — | |
| 1950 | #164 | 1,729 | — | |
| 1949 | #165 | 1,737 | — | |
| 1948 | #176 | 1,579 | #2,788 | 8 |
| 1947 | #161 | 1,845 | #2,862 | 8 |
| 1946 | #158 | 1,704 | — | |
| 1945 | #159 | 1,469 | #2,574 | 8 |
| 1944 | #186 | 1,163 | #3,109 | 6 |
| 1943 | #198 | 1,065 | — | |
| 1942 | #212 | 949 | #2,042 | 13 |
| 1941 | #217 | 797 | — | |
| 1940 | #213 | 811 | #2,671 | 8 |
| 1939 | #222 | 758 | — | |
| 1938 | #218 | 778 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | #230 | 706 | #2,905 | 7 |
| 1936 | #216 | 754 | — | |
| 1935 | #227 | 744 | #1,837 | 15 |
| 1934 | #223 | 771 | #2,563 | 9 |
| 1933 | #229 | 710 | #3,642 | 5 |
| 1932 | #229 | 704 | #3,361 | 6 |
| 1931 | #230 | 696 | #3,763 | 5 |
| 1930 | #229 | 707 | — | |
| 1929 | #225 | 707 | #2,980 | 8 |
| 1928 | #234 | 709 | #3,357 | 7 |
| 1927 | #240 | 729 | — | |
| 1926 | #256 | 664 | — | |
| 1925 | #241 | 741 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #243 | 751 | #3,505 | 7 |
| 1923 | #246 | 699 | — | |
| 1922 | #250 | 684 | — | |
| 1921 | #250 | 708 | #4,322 | 5 |
| 1920 | #235 | 764 | — | |
| 1919 | #226 | 751 | — | |
| 1918 | #251 | 656 | — | |
| 1917 | #246 | 634 | — | |
| 1916 | #244 | 649 | — | |
| 1915 | #247 | 571 | — | |
| 1914 | #244 | 472 | #3,264 | 5 |
| 1913 | #218 | 471 | — | |
| 1912 | #221 | 416 | — | |
| 1911 | #224 | 317 | — | |
| 1910 | #181 | 377 | — | |
| 1909 | #193 | 301 | — | |
| 1908 | #196 | 284 | — | |
| 1907 | #185 | 295 | — | |
| 1906 | #187 | 265 | — | |
| 1905 | #171 | 306 | — | |
| 1904 | #178 | 272 | — | |
| 1903 | #179 | 260 | — | |
| 1902 | #176 | 262 | — | |
| 1901 | #163 | 278 | — | |
| 1900 | #167 | 330 | — | |
| 1899 | #186 | 224 | — | |
| 1898 | #190 | 235 | — | |
| 1897 | #174 | 247 | — | |
| 1896 | #184 | 223 | — | |
| 1895 | #179 | 220 | — | |
| 1894 | #165 | 246 | — | |
| 1893 | #175 | 211 | — | |
| 1892 | #159 | 242 | — | |
| 1891 | #164 | 204 | — | |
| 1890 | #161 | 220 | — | |
| 1889 | #147 | 226 | — | |
| 1888 | #153 | 206 | — | |
| 1887 | #157 | 155 | — | |
| 1886 | #157 | 149 | — | |
| 1885 | #144 | 155 | — | |
| 1884 | #159 | 122 | — | |
| 1883 | #142 | 135 | — | |
| 1882 | #133 | 134 | — | |
| 1881 | #139 | 113 | — | |
| 1880 | #146 | 96 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Janie was already there! It came in at #146, and was given to 96 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1884, when fewer than 140 girls a year got the name.
Where Janie is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Virginia#704 · 1 in 3,374
- South Carolina#773 · 1 in 3,658
- Tennessee#813 · 1 in 4,009
- Pennsylvania#871 · 1 in 4,669
- North Carolina#905 · 1 in 4,648
Best ever in a state: #36 in South Carolina, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | #704 | 10 | 1 in 3,374 |
| South Carolina | #773 | 5 | 1 in 3,658 |
| Tennessee | #813 | 8 | 1 in 4,009 |
| Pennsylvania | #871 | 10 | 1 in 4,669 |
| North Carolina | #905 | 10 | 1 in 4,648 |
| Indiana | #1,032 | 5 | 1 in 5,582 |
| Texas | #1,062 | 26 | 1 in 6,175 |
| Illinois | #1,113 | 7 | 1 in 6,333 |
| Michigan | #1,210 | 5 | 1 in 7,146 |
| Florida | #1,243 | 11 | 1 in 7,887 |
| New York | #1,654 | 7 | 1 in 11,190 |
| California | #1,948 | 10 | 1 in 16,172 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Janie
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 455 spots since 2020 (#1,781 → #1,326)
- Biggest jump: 63 spots in 1988
- Biggest drop: 180 spots in 2003
Rise & fade · girls
2 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1882 at #133 (134 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 121 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 121 yrs · run 1880–1999
Share of babies · girls
1 in 789
- Highest: 1 in 789 girls born in 1889 were named Janie (0.13%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,567 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #133 in 1882, was only 1 in 805 (0.12%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
- 19.3% of all girls named Janie (14,615) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,491 | #133 (1882) | #148 |
| 1890s | 2,272 | #159 (1892) | #174 |
| 1900s | 2,853 | #163 (1901) | #180 |
| 1910s | 5,314 | #181 (1910) | #230 |
| 1920s | 7,156 | #225 (1929) | #242 |
| 1930s | 7,328 | #216 (1936) | #225 |
| 1940s | 13,119 | #158 (1946) | #185 |
| 1950s | 14,615 | #164 (1950) | #210 |
| 1960s | 7,532 | #274 (1960) | #349 |
| 1970s | 3,810 | #435 (1972) | #496 |
| 1980s | 3,079 | #550 (1981) | #610 |
| 1990s | 2,637 | #667 (1990) | #802 |
| 2000s | 2,062 | #946 (2002) | #1,134 |
| 2010s | 1,494 | #1,388 (2015) | #1,501 |
| 2020s | 836 | #1,326 (2025) | #1,546 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Janie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: