Jaquan
- Last seen for girls in 2001 at #15,352
- #2,284 for boys in 2025, 61 births
- Given to boys 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1999 · 567 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 10,605since 1975
Jaquan over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Jaquan has never cracked the top 400 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,284 | 61 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,078 | 72 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,129 | 68 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,875 | 84 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,884 | 81 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,655 | 96 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,868 | 80 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,733 | 89 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,530 | 107 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,532 | 109 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,567 | 103 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,306 | 135 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,203 | 149 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,102 | 169 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,028 | 185 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,005 | 195 | |
| 2009 | — | #912 | 226 | |
| 2008 | — | #812 | 270 | |
| 2007 | — | #759 | 289 | |
| 2006 | — | #658 | 349 | |
| 2005 | — | #612 | 366 | |
| 2004 | — | #494 | 495 | |
| 2003 | — | #581 | 380 | |
| 2002 | — | #485 | 476 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #463 | 514 |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #445 | 536 |
| 1999 | — | #414 | 567 | |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #425 | 544 |
| 1997 | — | #432 | 524 | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #446 | 504 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #451 | 504 |
| 1994 | #5,713 | 16 | #426 | 536 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #533 | 372 |
| 1992 | — | #584 | 307 | |
| 1991 | — | #607 | 281 | |
| 1990 | — | #754 | 183 | |
| 1989 | — | #808 | 150 | |
| 1988 | — | #880 | 117 | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #1,101 | 76 |
| 1986 | — | #1,476 | 46 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,524 | 43 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,399 | 46 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,905 | 28 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,999 | 27 | |
| 1981 | — | #3,030 | 14 | |
| 1980 | — | #4,134 | 9 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,569 | 11 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,215 | 12 | |
| 1977 | — | #4,582 | 7 | |
| 1976 | — | #4,012 | 8 | |
| 1975 | — | #5,464 | 5 | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1975
The first year at least five boys were named Jaquan! It came in at #5,464, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1975, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaquan is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #1,350 | 5 | 1 in 10,044 |
| Florida | #1,353 | 8 | 1 in 11,942 |
| Texas | #2,285 | 6 | 1 in 29,175 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaquan
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 629 spots since 2020 (#1,655 → #2,284)
- Biggest jump: 221 spots in 1988
- Biggest drop: 118 spots in 2005
Rise & fade · boys
24 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1975
- Peaked 1999 at #414 (567 births)
- Births halved by 2008, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 22 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 22 yrs · run 1988–2009
Share of babies · boys
1 in 3,387
- Highest: 1 in 3,387 boys born in 1999 were named Jaquan (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 28,001 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 40.8% of all boys named Jaquan (4,322) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 43 | #3,215 (1978) | #4,168 |
| 1980s | 556 | #808 (1989) | #1,826 |
| 1990s | 4,322 | #414 (1999) | #507 |
| 2000s | 3,901 | #445 (2000) | #622 |
| 2010s | 1,321 | #1,005 (2010) | #1,387 |
| 2020s | 462 | #1,655 (2020) | #1,984 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaquan ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: