Jarrett
Last seen for girls in 2002 at #15,432 · #2,390 for boys in 2025, 57 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1998 · 1,020 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 22,892since 1880
Jarrett over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Jarrett has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,390 | 57 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,169 | 67 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,147 | 67 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,907 | 82 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,823 | 85 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,518 | 110 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,347 | 133 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,553 | 108 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,287 | 141 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,366 | 130 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,139 | 166 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,040 | 193 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,243 | 142 | |
| 2012 | — | #993 | 200 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,031 | 184 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,092 | 176 | |
| 2009 | — | #912 | 226 | |
| 2008 | — | #894 | 233 | |
| 2007 | — | #714 | 323 | |
| 2006 | — | #663 | 345 | |
| 2005 | — | #579 | 398 | |
| 2004 | — | #517 | 464 | |
| 2003 | — | #416 | 616 | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #375 | 699 |
| 2001 | — | #337 | 820 | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #299 | 1,005 |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #301 | 955 |
| 1998 | — | #282 | 1,020 | |
| 1997 | — | #305 | 889 | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #372 | 636 |
| 1995 | — | #410 | 559 | |
| 1994 | — | #407 | 562 | |
| 1993 | — | #382 | 601 | |
| 1992 | — | #445 | 495 | |
| 1991 | — | #399 | 570 | |
| 1990 | — | #380 | 609 | |
| 1989 | — | #356 | 637 | |
| 1988 | — | #374 | 539 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #356 | 548 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #357 | 530 |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | #376 | 481 |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 | #403 | 413 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #385 | 434 |
| 1982 | — | #382 | 450 | |
| 1981 | — | #361 | 487 | |
| 1980 | — | #409 | 395 | |
| 1979 | — | #421 | 360 | |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #439 | 330 |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #500 | 267 |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #496 | 258 |
| 1975 | — | #523 | 237 | |
| 1974 | — | #503 | 250 | |
| 1973 | — | #484 | 262 | |
| 1972 | — | #588 | 184 | |
| 1971 | — | #579 | 199 | |
| 1970 | — | #609 | 179 | |
| 1969 | — | #592 | 173 | |
| 1968 | — | #669 | 125 | |
| 1967 | — | #782 | 87 | |
| 1966 | — | #875 | 69 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,294 | 35 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,384 | 32 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,744 | 21 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,423 | 30 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,602 | 25 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,812 | 20 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,865 | 19 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,506 | 11 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,887 | 18 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,608 | 24 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,572 | 24 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,525 | 25 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,427 | 28 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,297 | 33 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,643 | 21 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,499 | 24 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,348 | 29 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,559 | 22 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,449 | 26 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,557 | 21 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,494 | 20 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,483 | 21 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,461 | 23 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,682 | 18 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,633 | 18 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,081 | 12 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,578 | 18 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,084 | 12 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,528 | 20 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,872 | 14 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,396 | 10 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,393 | 10 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,542 | 9 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,313 | 11 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,328 | 11 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,444 | 11 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,317 | 12 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,843 | 9 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,193 | 14 | |
| 1926 | — | #2,725 | 10 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,089 | 15 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,229 | 14 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,446 | 12 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,143 | 15 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,152 | 15 | |
| 1920 | — | #3,489 | 7 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,265 | 13 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,096 | 8 | |
| 1917 | — | #3,217 | 7 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,310 | 11 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,101 | 10 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,496 | 6 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | #928 | 6 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #809 | 6 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jarrett was already there! It came in at #809, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1883, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jarrett is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- West Virginia#216 · 1 in 1,124
- Nebraska#320 · 1 in 1,718
- Kansas#324 · 1 in 1,643
- Indiana#336 · 1 in 2,125
- Arkansas#350 · 1 in 1,883
Best ever in a state: #116 in Delaware, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #216 | 8 | 1 in 1,124 |
| Nebraska | #320 | 6 | 1 in 1,718 |
| Kansas | #324 | 10 | 1 in 1,643 |
| Indiana | #336 | 18 | 1 in 2,125 |
| Arkansas | #350 | 8 | 1 in 1,883 |
| Oklahoma | #366 | 10 | 1 in 2,062 |
| Iowa | #371 | 7 | 1 in 2,345 |
| Alabama | #374 | 11 | 1 in 2,156 |
| Kentucky | #400 | 8 | 1 in 2,933 |
| Louisiana | #414 | 11 | 1 in 2,193 |
| Minnesota | #418 | 10 | 1 in 2,997 |
| South Carolina | #419 | 9 | 1 in 2,356 |
| Connecticut | #420 | 5 | 1 in 3,356 |
| Pennsylvania | #438 | 17 | 1 in 3,752 |
| North Carolina | #452 | 17 | 1 in 3,077 |
| Ohio | #459 | 18 | 1 in 3,640 |
| Wisconsin | #460 | 9 | 1 in 3,257 |
| Missouri | #461 | 10 | 1 in 3,403 |
| Utah | #485 | 7 | 1 in 3,198 |
| Tennessee | #555 | 9 | 1 in 4,093 |
| Texas | #565 | 37 | 1 in 4,895 |
| Virginia | #569 | 10 | 1 in 4,307 |
| Georgia | #587 | 15 | 1 in 3,981 |
| Illinois | #591 | 17 | 1 in 4,538 |
| Michigan | #598 | 11 | 1 in 4,976 |
| Florida | #662 | 18 | 1 in 5,500 |
| Washington | #709 | 6 | 1 in 5,787 |
| California | #916 | 22 | 1 in 11,553 |
| New Jersey | #943 | 5 | 1 in 9,387 |
| New York | #1,049 | 10 | 1 in 10,828 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jarrett
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 221 spots since 2024 (#2,169 → #2,390)
- 872 spots since 2020 (#1,518 → #2,390)
- 1,251 spots since 2015 (#1,139 → #2,390)
- Biggest jump: 419 spots in 1966 (#1,294 → #875)
- Biggest drop: 250 spots in 2013 (#993 → #1,243)
Rise & fade · boys
118 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1998 at #282 (1,020 births)
- Births halved by 2004, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 48 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 48 yrs · run 1966–2009
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,874
- Highest: 1 in 1,874 boys born in 1998 were named Jarrett (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 29,966 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 30.1% of all boys named Jarrett (6,896) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 12 | #809 (1880) | #829 |
| 1890s | 6 | #928 (1899) | #928 |
| 1900s | 0 | — | — |
| 1910s | 65 | #2,101 (1914) | #2,575 |
| 1920s | 123 | #2,089 (1925) | #2,463 |
| 1930s | 126 | #1,528 (1937) | #2,148 |
| 1940s | 210 | #1,348 (1949) | #1,575 |
| 1950s | 227 | #1,297 (1952) | #1,683 |
| 1960s | 617 | #592 (1969) | #1,218 |
| 1970s | 2,526 | #421 (1979) | #514 |
| 1980s | 4,914 | #356 (1989) | #376 |
| 1990s | 6,896 | #282 (1998) | #368 |
| 2000s | 5,129 | #299 (2000) | #571 |
| 2010s | 1,573 | #993 (2012) | #1,209 |
| 2020s | 468 | #1,518 (2020) | #1,992 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jarrett in 2005
boys
#579
398 births · 1 in 5,018 boys
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 5,018 of them was named Jarrett, which outranked 95.7% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jarrett
Biggest movers since 2004
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.