Jase
- #14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births
- #717 for boys in 2025, 375 births
- Given to boys 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2013 · 4,555 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 1 yrof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 23,905since 1967
Jase over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | #717 | 375 |
| 2024 | — | #636 | 440 | |
| 2023 | — | #611 | 457 | |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | #552 | 540 |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | #496 | 592 |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 | #473 | 631 |
| 2019 | — | #441 | 690 | |
| 2018 | — | #370 | 881 | |
| 2017 | — | #328 | 1,046 | |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 | #240 | 1,596 |
| 2015 | #8,931 | 12 | #182 | 2,297 |
| 2014 | #7,636 | 15 | #105 | 3,754 |
| 2013 | #5,644 | 23 | #89 | 4,555 |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | #304 | 1,130 |
| 2011 | — | #561 | 454 | |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #600 | 414 |
| 2009 | — | #630 | 396 | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | #647 | 379 |
| 2007 | — | #561 | 459 | |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #564 | 444 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #570 | 409 |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #620 | 344 |
| 2003 | — | #972 | 165 | |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | #965 | 165 |
| 2001 | — | #1,203 | 112 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,152 | 120 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,073 | 126 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,383 | 84 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,386 | 79 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,533 | 65 | |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #1,430 | 69 |
| 1994 | — | #1,927 | 43 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,969 | 41 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,621 | 54 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,725 | 47 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,435 | 61 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,476 | 56 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,514 | 49 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,563 | 45 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,873 | 32 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,644 | 38 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,036 | 26 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,905 | 28 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,518 | 19 | |
| 1981 | — | #3,601 | 11 | |
| 1980 | — | #6,250 | 5 | |
| 1979 | — | #4,842 | 7 | |
| 1978 | — | #5,059 | 6 | |
| 1977 | — | #3,836 | 9 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | #4,309 | 7 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,120 | 11 | |
| 1973 | — | #3,445 | 9 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,986 | 5 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,963 | 7 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,282 | 9 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,935 | 6 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1967
The first year at least five boys were named Jase! It came in at #3,559, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1968, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jase is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- West Virginia#227 · 1 in 770
- Louisiana#231 · 1 in 870
- Mississippi#333 · 1 in 1,204
- Arkansas#353 · 1 in 1,398
- Alabama#375 · 1 in 1,537
Best ever in a state: #20 in North Dakota, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #227 | 8 | 1 in 770 |
| Louisiana | #231 | 22 | 1 in 870 |
| Mississippi | #333 | 9 | 1 in 1,204 |
| Arkansas | #353 | 9 | 1 in 1,398 |
| Alabama | #375 | 14 | 1 in 1,537 |
| Missouri | #439 | 14 | 1 in 1,986 |
| Georgia | #464 | 23 | 1 in 2,184 |
| Tennessee | #477 | 16 | 1 in 2,298 |
| Indiana | #483 | 14 | 1 in 2,262 |
| Kentucky | #485 | 9 | 1 in 2,282 |
| Pennsylvania | #546 | 17 | 1 in 3,074 |
| Ohio | #555 | 18 | 1 in 2,918 |
| North Carolina | #569 | 17 | 1 in 3,028 |
| Iowa | #571 | 5 | 1 in 2,766 |
| Virginia | #587 | 12 | 1 in 3,104 |
| Michigan | #601 | 13 | 1 in 3,092 |
| Wisconsin | #618 | 7 | 1 in 3,347 |
| Oklahoma | #621 | 6 | 1 in 2,947 |
| South Carolina | #743 | 5 | 1 in 4,240 |
| Florida | #754 | 20 | 1 in 4,777 |
| Texas | #778 | 35 | 1 in 5,001 |
| Minnesota | #807 | 5 | 1 in 4,900 |
| Illinois | #870 | 9 | 1 in 5,506 |
| California | #1,011 | 21 | 1 in 8,356 |
| New York | #1,202 | 9 | 1 in 9,380 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jase
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 244 spots since 2020 (#473 → #717)
- Biggest jump: 352 spots in 2004
- Biggest drop: 88 spots in 2017
Rise & fade · boys
46 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1967
- Peaked 2013 at #89 (4,555 births)
- Births halved by 2016, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 1 yr
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 1 yr · 2013
- Top 1,000: 24 yrs · run 2002–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 415
- Highest: 1 in 415 boys born in 2013 were named Jase (0.24%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,555 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 70.3% of all boys named Jase (16,817) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12 | #3,559 (1967) | #3,747 |
| 1970s | 70 | #3,120 (1974) | #4,094 |
| 1980s | 309 | #1,476 (1989) | #2,438 |
| 1990s | 669 | #1,073 (1999) | #1,548 |
| 2000s | 2,993 | #561 (2007) | #788 |
| 2010s | 16,817 | #89 (2013) | #322 |
| 2020s | 3,035 | #473 (2020) | #581 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jase ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: