Jashawn
Last seen for girls in 2001 at #15,352 · #4,539 for boys in 2025, 22 births
Given to boys 98.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2001 · 108 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,328since 1976
Jashawn over time
Rank among boys' names. Jashawn has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #4,539 | 22 | |
| 2024 | — | #4,200 | 25 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,228 | 37 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,879 | 28 | |
| 2021 | — | #3,362 | 34 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,344 | 33 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,993 | 40 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,708 | 45 | |
| 2017 | — | #3,123 | 37 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,993 | 39 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,722 | 44 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,345 | 55 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,205 | 59 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,959 | 72 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,675 | 89 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,639 | 95 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,708 | 91 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,329 | 130 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,299 | 134 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,265 | 132 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,411 | 104 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,335 | 110 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,310 | 106 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,295 | 104 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #1,231 | 108 |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #1,370 | 92 |
| 1999 | — | #1,604 | 67 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,931 | 50 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,908 | 48 | |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | #2,047 | 42 |
| 1995 | — | #1,864 | 46 | |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | #2,181 | 37 |
| 1993 | — | #1,969 | 41 | |
| 1992 | — | #2,909 | 23 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #2,915 | 22 |
| 1990 | — | #3,607 | 16 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,618 | 15 | |
| 1988 | — | #4,786 | 9 | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #4,239 | 10 |
| 1986 | — | #5,332 | 7 | |
| 1985 | — | #5,785 | 6 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,925 | 10 | |
| 1983 | — | #4,907 | 7 | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | #4,418 | 7 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jashawn! It came in at #4,418, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1977–1982, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jashawn is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#419 · 1 in 2,431
- Louisiana#629 · 1 in 4,290
- Ohio#642 · 1 in 6,701
- Illinois#829 · 1 in 8,713
- North Carolina#834 · 1 in 8,377
Best ever in a state: #367 in South Carolina, 2006.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #419 | 6 | 1 in 2,431 |
| Louisiana | #629 | 6 | 1 in 4,290 |
| Ohio | #642 | 10 | 1 in 6,701 |
| Illinois | #829 | 9 | 1 in 8,713 |
| North Carolina | #834 | 6 | 1 in 8,377 |
| Georgia | #864 | 7 | 1 in 7,973 |
| Florida | #1,194 | 6 | 1 in 14,995 |
| New York | #1,425 | 6 | 1 in 18,363 |
| Texas | #1,541 | 7 | 1 in 24,936 |
| California | #1,743 | 7 | 1 in 35,008 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jashawn
- 339 spots since 2024 (#4,200 → #4,539)
- 1,195 spots since 2020 (#3,344 → #4,539)
- 1,817 spots since 2015 (#2,722 → #4,539)
- Debuted 1976
- Peaked 2001 at #1,231 (108 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 15,488 boys born in 2007 were named Jashawn (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 77,640 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,231 in 2001, was only 1 in 17,990 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 47.7% of all boys named Jashawn (1,111) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7 | #4,418 (1976) | #4,418 |
| 1980s | 64 | #3,618 (1989) | #4,656 |
| 1990s | 392 | #1,604 (1999) | #2,294 |
| 2000s | 1,111 | #1,231 (2001) | #1,355 |
| 2010s | 575 | #1,639 (2010) | #2,436 |
| 2020s | 179 | #3,228 (2023) | #3,759 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jashawn in 2002
Top boys' names in 2002
More about 2002
boys
1,941,514 boys got a published name in 2002; 1 in 18,668 of them was named Jashawn, which outranked 89.6% of the 12,489 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 12.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,288Marcello105
- #1,288Messiah105
- #1,288Remy105
- #1,295Jashawn104
- #1,295Aleksander104
- #1,295Jedidiah104
- #1,295Judson104
- #1,303Galen103
- #1,303Jaydin103
- #1,305Aedan102
Tied with 7 names at #1,295; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.