Jasmin
#1,406 for girls in 2025, 155 births · Last seen for boys in 2017 at #12,246
Given to girls 98.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1994 · 1,758 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 45,060since 1951
Jasmin over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Jasmin has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,406 | 155 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,350 | 169 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,361 | 165 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,474 | 149 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,262 | 185 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,170 | 199 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,267 | 183 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,233 | 189 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,079 | 235 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #955 | 284 | — | |
| 2015 | #882 | 313 | — | |
| 2014 | #688 | 412 | — | |
| 2013 | #651 | 436 | — | |
| 2012 | #515 | 590 | — | |
| 2011 | #422 | 737 | — | |
| 2010 | #348 | 927 | — | |
| 2009 | #282 | 1,163 | — | |
| 2008 | #225 | 1,503 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #204 | 1,688 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #182 | 1,945 | #7,427 | 10 |
| 2005 | #181 | 1,905 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #181 | 1,886 | #3,735 | 24 |
| 2003 | #198 | 1,664 | #6,258 | 11 |
| 2002 | #182 | 1,758 | #4,502 | 17 |
| 2001 | #187 | 1,756 | #5,390 | 13 |
| 2000 | #193 | 1,645 | #5,040 | 14 |
| 1999 | #196 | 1,574 | #4,537 | 15 |
| 1998 | #177 | 1,710 | #5,466 | 11 |
| 1997 | #187 | 1,606 | #3,064 | 24 |
| 1996 | #189 | 1,588 | #3,830 | 17 |
| 1995 | #184 | 1,604 | #3,191 | 21 |
| 1994 | #173 | 1,758 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #186 | 1,553 | #2,509 | 29 |
| 1992 | #212 | 1,352 | #3,338 | 19 |
| 1991 | #220 | 1,273 | #2,989 | 21 |
| 1990 | #231 | 1,219 | #2,780 | 23 |
| 1989 | #250 | 1,078 | #1,919 | 38 |
| 1988 | #282 | 885 | #2,437 | 24 |
| 1987 | #297 | 816 | #1,974 | 31 |
| 1986 | #346 | 697 | #2,096 | 27 |
| 1985 | #376 | 603 | #2,427 | 21 |
| 1984 | #459 | 454 | #2,956 | 15 |
| 1983 | #554 | 331 | #2,408 | 20 |
| 1982 | #529 | 370 | #2,596 | 18 |
| 1981 | #526 | 364 | #3,221 | 13 |
| 1980 | #536 | 351 | #2,617 | 18 |
| 1979 | #566 | 324 | #3,018 | 14 |
| 1978 | #675 | 236 | #3,215 | 12 |
| 1977 | #680 | 230 | #3,386 | 11 |
| 1976 | #844 | 162 | #3,471 | 10 |
| 1975 | #984 | 125 | — | |
| 1974 | #828 | 161 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #1,266 | 82 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,222 | 34 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,137 | 38 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,856 | 24 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,844 | 22 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,708 | 22 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,300 | 10 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | — | |
| 1963 | #5,296 | 7 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,011 | 11 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,189 | 16 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,512 | 13 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,161 | 9 | — | |
| 1955 | #4,740 | 7 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 | — | |
| 1953 | #3,480 | 11 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1951
The first year at least five girls were named Jasmin! It came in at #5,414, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1951–1952, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Jasmin is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- California#155 · 1 in 769
- Texas#182 · 1 in 887
- Oregon#219 · 1 in 869
- Florida#221 · 1 in 1,098
- Nevada#222 · 1 in 882
Best ever in a state: #71 in Nevada, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #155 | 284 | 1 in 769 |
| Texas | #182 | 188 | 1 in 887 |
| Oregon | #219 | 18 | 1 in 869 |
| Florida | #221 | 75 | 1 in 1,098 |
| Nevada | #222 | 13 | 1 in 882 |
| New York | #227 | 82 | 1 in 1,156 |
| Nebraska | #233 | 10 | 1 in 821 |
| Colorado | #243 | 23 | 1 in 1,037 |
| Illinois | #245 | 54 | 1 in 1,171 |
| Maryland | #248 | 24 | 1 in 1,030 |
| North Carolina | #248 | 41 | 1 in 1,132 |
| Washington | #295 | 25 | 1 in 1,254 |
| New Jersey | #310 | 26 | 1 in 1,474 |
| Wisconsin | #313 | 18 | 1 in 1,362 |
| Arizona | #316 | 24 | 1 in 1,397 |
| Idaho | #319 | 6 | 1 in 1,129 |
| Georgia | #333 | 33 | 1 in 1,537 |
| Virginia | #343 | 23 | 1 in 1,595 |
| South Carolina | #365 | 12 | 1 in 1,546 |
| Kentucky | #403 | 10 | 1 in 1,928 |
| Kansas | #404 | 8 | 1 in 1,720 |
| Oklahoma | #418 | 10 | 1 in 1,722 |
| Arkansas | #427 | 7 | 1 in 1,686 |
| Iowa | #448 | 7 | 1 in 1,889 |
| New Mexico | #449 | 5 | 1 in 1,604 |
| Michigan | #464 | 18 | 1 in 2,375 |
| Indiana | #474 | 14 | 1 in 2,264 |
| Utah | #522 | 8 | 1 in 2,381 |
| Connecticut | #524 | 5 | 1 in 2,523 |
| Massachusetts | #533 | 9 | 1 in 2,916 |
| Ohio | #533 | 19 | 1 in 2,865 |
| Tennessee | #548 | 11 | 1 in 2,774 |
| Alabama | #611 | 7 | 1 in 2,859 |
| Louisiana | #629 | 7 | 1 in 2,951 |
| Pennsylvania | #666 | 14 | 1 in 3,902 |
| Missouri | #821 | 6 | 1 in 4,668 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jasmin
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 56 spots since 2024 (#1,350 → #1,406)
- 236 spots since 2020 (#1,170 → #1,406)
- 524 spots since 2015 (#882 → #1,406)
- Biggest jump: 438 spots in 1974 (#1,266 → #828)
- Biggest drop: 194 spots in 2015 (#688 → #882)
Rise & fade · girls
43 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1951
- Peaked 1994 at #173 (1,758 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 17 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 43 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 43 yrs · run 1974–2016
Share of babies · girls
1 in 970
- Highest: 1 in 970 girls born in 2005 were named Jasmin (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 10,369 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #173 in 1994, was only 1 in 1,016 (0.10%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 37.5% of all girls named Jasmin (16,913) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 85 | #2,760 (1959) | #4,171 |
| 1960s | 132 | #2,708 (1968) | #3,841 |
| 1970s | 1,416 | #566 (1979) | #1,306 |
| 1980s | 5,949 | #250 (1989) | #416 |
| 1990s | 15,237 | #173 (1994) | #196 |
| 2000s | 16,913 | #181 (2005) | #202 |
| 2010s | 4,306 | #348 (2010) | #804 |
| 2020s | 1,022 | #1,170 (2020) | #1,337 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jasmin in 2009
girls
#282
1,163 births · 1 in 1,580 girls
Top girls' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 1,580 of them was named Jasmin, which outranked 98.6% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jasmin
Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.