Jasmine
#206 for girls in 2025, 1,481 births · Last seen for boys in 2016 at #8,816
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1993 · 12,063 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 28 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 258,626since 1906
Jasmine over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #206 | 1,481 | — | |
| 2024 | #199 | 1,530 | — | |
| 2023 | #189 | 1,596 | — | |
| 2022 | #177 | 1,685 | — | |
| 2021 | #170 | 1,724 | — | |
| 2020 | #140 | 1,936 | — | |
| 2019 | #131 | 2,110 | — | |
| 2018 | #137 | 2,142 | — | |
| 2017 | #130 | 2,274 | — | |
| 2016 | #122 | 2,657 | #8,816 | 8 |
| 2015 | #110 | 2,813 | — | |
| 2014 | #99 | 3,045 | — | |
| 2013 | #103 | 3,066 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #83 | 3,394 | — | |
| 2011 | #72 | 3,710 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #62 | 4,182 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #51 | 4,886 | #7,692 | 10 |
| 2008 | #43 | 5,536 | #6,763 | 12 |
| 2007 | #32 | 6,781 | #5,210 | 17 |
| 2006 | #29 | 7,521 | #5,781 | 14 |
| 2005 | #29 | 7,873 | #4,464 | 19 |
| 2004 | #26 | 8,492 | #2,599 | 41 |
| 2003 | #27 | 8,065 | #4,276 | 19 |
| 2002 | #26 | 8,869 | #2,943 | 31 |
| 2001 | #25 | 8,958 | #4,676 | 16 |
| 2000 | #27 | 9,099 | #3,423 | 24 |
| 1999 | #26 | 9,351 | #3,704 | 20 |
| 1998 | #26 | 9,488 | #2,926 | 27 |
| 1997 | #24 | 9,680 | #3,261 | 22 |
| 1996 | #28 | 9,707 | #2,254 | 36 |
| 1995 | #25 | 10,279 | #2,299 | 34 |
| 1994 | #23 | 11,714 | #1,795 | 48 |
| 1993 | #23 | 12,063 | #1,769 | 48 |
| 1992 | #28 | 10,479 | #2,002 | 39 |
| 1991 | #24 | 11,524 | #1,573 | 54 |
| 1990 | #28 | 11,037 | #1,072 | 98 |
| 1989 | #30 | 9,549 | #807 | 151 |
| 1988 | #53 | 6,446 | #1,003 | 94 |
| 1987 | #79 | 3,723 | #1,195 | 65 |
| 1986 | #95 | 2,993 | #1,385 | 51 |
| 1985 | #103 | 2,708 | #1,544 | 42 |
| 1984 | #149 | 1,929 | #1,842 | 30 |
| 1983 | #175 | 1,567 | #2,272 | 22 |
| 1982 | #189 | 1,448 | #2,709 | 17 |
| 1981 | #191 | 1,402 | #1,548 | 39 |
| 1980 | #216 | 1,187 | #2,536 | 19 |
| 1979 | #245 | 1,039 | #2,669 | 17 |
| 1978 | #291 | 797 | #2,375 | 19 |
| 1977 | #327 | 721 | #2,791 | 15 |
| 1976 | #391 | 525 | #4,012 | 8 |
| 1975 | #481 | 382 | #2,902 | 13 |
| 1974 | #572 | 282 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #862 | 149 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,192 | 90 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,301 | 84 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,526 | 64 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,635 | 54 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,749 | 45 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,432 | 25 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,827 | 39 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,110 | 31 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,348 | 27 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,094 | 32 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,357 | 26 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,004 | 34 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,982 | 33 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,852 | 36 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,167 | 27 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,507 | 50 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,581 | 45 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,691 | 37 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,769 | 34 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,872 | 29 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,266 | 21 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,016 | 24 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,955 | 24 | — | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | — | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | — | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | #3,146 | 8 | — | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | — | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | — | |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | — | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | #2,552 | 13 | — | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | #2,489 | 14 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | #4,011 | 7 | — | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | #4,398 | 6 | — | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | — | |
| 1917 | #3,092 | 9 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | — | |
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | #2,360 | 7 | — | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jasmine! It came in at #1,951, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1906–1911, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jasmine is popular in 2004
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#10 · 1 in 112
- California#10 · 1 in 138
- Nevada#14 · 1 in 126
- Georgia#14 · 1 in 151
- Arizona#15 · 1 in 153
Best ever in a state: #1 in District of Columbia, 1994.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #10 | 1,662 | 1 in 138 |
| New Mexico | #10 | 73 | 1 in 112 |
| Georgia | #14 | 334 | 1 in 151 |
| Nevada | #14 | 86 | 1 in 126 |
| Arizona | #15 | 225 | 1 in 153 |
| District of Columbia | #16 | 31 | 1 in 113 |
| Hawaii | #16 | 33 | 1 in 111 |
| Mississippi | #16 | 94 | 1 in 125 |
| Texas | #16 | 896 | 1 in 178 |
| Arkansas | #18 | 92 | 1 in 131 |
| Florida | #18 | 550 | 1 in 149 |
| Idaho | #19 | 48 | 1 in 135 |
| South Carolina | #20 | 130 | 1 in 132 |
| Colorado | #22 | 147 | 1 in 168 |
| North Carolina | #24 | 283 | 1 in 157 |
| Oregon | #25 | 103 | 1 in 154 |
| Vermont | #25 | 16 | 1 in 100 |
| Washington | #25 | 176 | 1 in 164 |
| Louisiana | #28 | 122 | 1 in 170 |
| Maryland | #28 | 146 | 1 in 168 |
| Maine | #29 | 33 | 1 in 134 |
| Alabama | #30 | 103 | 1 in 188 |
| Illinois | #30 | 336 | 1 in 204 |
| Tennessee | #31 | 173 | 1 in 176 |
| Oklahoma | #32 | 91 | 1 in 185 |
| Virginia | #32 | 200 | 1 in 185 |
| Indiana | #33 | 176 | 1 in 185 |
| South Dakota | #33 | 21 | 1 in 145 |
| Rhode Island | #35 | 25 | 1 in 157 |
| Michigan | #36 | 226 | 1 in 213 |
| Montana | #36 | 20 | 1 in 140 |
| Wisconsin | #38 | 122 | 1 in 204 |
| Alaska | #40 | 15 | 1 in 155 |
| Missouri | #40 | 140 | 1 in 203 |
| West Virginia | #40 | 40 | 1 in 179 |
| Kansas | #42 | 63 | 1 in 215 |
| Kentucky | #42 | 84 | 1 in 232 |
| North Dakota | #43 | 15 | 1 in 167 |
| Iowa | #45 | 66 | 1 in 206 |
| Minnesota | #50 | 106 | 1 in 248 |
| New York | #50 | 358 | 1 in 271 |
| Ohio | #51 | 227 | 1 in 253 |
| Utah | #51 | 65 | 1 in 281 |
| Delaware | #55 | 16 | 1 in 193 |
| New Hampshire | #55 | 21 | 1 in 223 |
| New Jersey | #60 | 143 | 1 in 291 |
| Pennsylvania | #64 | 183 | 1 in 303 |
| Connecticut | #68 | 51 | 1 in 281 |
| Massachusetts | #74 | 96 | 1 in 305 |
| Nebraska | #89 | 25 | 1 in 336 |
| Wyoming | #101 | 5 | 1 in 255 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jasmine
- 7 spots since 2024 (#199 → #206)
- 66 spots since 2020 (#140 → #206)
- 96 spots since 2015 (#110 → #206)
- Biggest jump: 330 spots in 1973 (#1,192 → #862)
- Biggest drop: 30 spots in 2021 (#140 → #170)
- Debuted 1906
- Peaked 1993 at #23 (12,063 births)
- Births halved by 2008, 15 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 28 yrs · run 1986–2012
- Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 1973–2025
- Highest: 1 in 150 girls born in 1993 were named Jasmine (0.67%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,085 girls born in 2025 (0.09%)
- 40.7% of all girls named Jasmine (105,322) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | #1,951 (1906) | #1,951 |
| 1910s | 38 | #2,360 (1912) | #3,203 |
| 1920s | 46 | #2,489 (1925) | #3,501 |
| 1930s | 21 | #3,109 (1933) | #3,602 |
| 1940s | 11 | #4,556 (1945) | #4,604 |
| 1950s | 327 | #1,507 (1957) | #1,868 |
| 1960s | 346 | #1,635 (1969) | #2,054 |
| 1970s | 4,133 | #245 (1979) | #719 |
| 1980s | 32,952 | #30 (1989) | #128 |
| 1990s | 105,322 | #23 (1993) | #26 |
| 2000s | 76,080 | #25 (2001) | #32 |
| 2010s | 29,393 | #62 (2010) | #105 |
| 2020s | 9,952 | #140 (2020) | #180 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jasmine in 2004
Top girls' names in 2004
Top boys' names in 2004
More about 2004
girls
1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 216 of them was named Jasmine, which outranked 99.9% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,984,979 boys got a published name in 2004; 1 in 48,414 of them was named Jasmine, which outranked 80.4% of the 13,228 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,569Victoria42
- #2,569Yordi42
- #2,569Zakariya42
- #2,599Jasmine41
- #2,599Aarav41
- #2,599Adler41
- #2,599Anthoni41
- #2,643Abhishek40
- #2,643Alekzander40
- #2,643Anibal40
Tied with 43 names at #2,599; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.