Jasmine
#206 for girls in 2025, 1,481 births · Last seen for boys in 2016 at #8,816
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1993 · 12,063 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 28 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 258,626since 1906
Jasmine over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #206 | 1,481 | — | |
| 2024 | #199 | 1,530 | — | |
| 2023 | #189 | 1,596 | — | |
| 2022 | #177 | 1,685 | — | |
| 2021 | #170 | 1,724 | — | |
| 2020 | #140 | 1,936 | — | |
| 2019 | #131 | 2,110 | — | |
| 2018 | #137 | 2,142 | — | |
| 2017 | #130 | 2,274 | — | |
| 2016 | #122 | 2,657 | #8,816 | 8 |
| 2015 | #110 | 2,813 | — | |
| 2014 | #99 | 3,045 | — | |
| 2013 | #103 | 3,066 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #83 | 3,394 | — | |
| 2011 | #72 | 3,710 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #62 | 4,182 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #51 | 4,886 | #7,692 | 10 |
| 2008 | #43 | 5,536 | #6,763 | 12 |
| 2007 | #32 | 6,781 | #5,210 | 17 |
| 2006 | #29 | 7,521 | #5,781 | 14 |
| 2005 | #29 | 7,873 | #4,464 | 19 |
| 2004 | #26 | 8,492 | #2,599 | 41 |
| 2003 | #27 | 8,065 | #4,276 | 19 |
| 2002 | #26 | 8,869 | #2,943 | 31 |
| 2001 | #25 | 8,958 | #4,676 | 16 |
| 2000 | #27 | 9,099 | #3,423 | 24 |
| 1999 | #26 | 9,351 | #3,704 | 20 |
| 1998 | #26 | 9,488 | #2,926 | 27 |
| 1997 | #24 | 9,680 | #3,261 | 22 |
| 1996 | #28 | 9,707 | #2,254 | 36 |
| 1995 | #25 | 10,279 | #2,299 | 34 |
| 1994 | #23 | 11,714 | #1,795 | 48 |
| 1993 | #23 | 12,063 | #1,769 | 48 |
| 1992 | #28 | 10,479 | #2,002 | 39 |
| 1991 | #24 | 11,524 | #1,573 | 54 |
| 1990 | #28 | 11,037 | #1,072 | 98 |
| 1989 | #30 | 9,549 | #807 | 151 |
| 1988 | #53 | 6,446 | #1,003 | 94 |
| 1987 | #79 | 3,723 | #1,195 | 65 |
| 1986 | #95 | 2,993 | #1,385 | 51 |
| 1985 | #103 | 2,708 | #1,544 | 42 |
| 1984 | #149 | 1,929 | #1,842 | 30 |
| 1983 | #175 | 1,567 | #2,272 | 22 |
| 1982 | #189 | 1,448 | #2,709 | 17 |
| 1981 | #191 | 1,402 | #1,548 | 39 |
| 1980 | #216 | 1,187 | #2,536 | 19 |
| 1979 | #245 | 1,039 | #2,669 | 17 |
| 1978 | #291 | 797 | #2,375 | 19 |
| 1977 | #327 | 721 | #2,791 | 15 |
| 1976 | #391 | 525 | #4,012 | 8 |
| 1975 | #481 | 382 | #2,902 | 13 |
| 1974 | #572 | 282 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #862 | 149 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,192 | 90 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,301 | 84 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,526 | 64 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,635 | 54 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,749 | 45 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,432 | 25 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,827 | 39 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,110 | 31 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,348 | 27 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,094 | 32 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,357 | 26 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,004 | 34 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,982 | 33 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,852 | 36 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,167 | 27 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,507 | 50 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,581 | 45 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,691 | 37 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,769 | 34 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,872 | 29 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,266 | 21 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,016 | 24 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,955 | 24 | — | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | — | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | — | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | #3,146 | 8 | — | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | — | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | — | |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | — | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | #2,552 | 13 | — | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | #2,489 | 14 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | #4,011 | 7 | — | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | #4,398 | 6 | — | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | — | |
| 1917 | #3,092 | 9 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | — | |
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | #2,360 | 7 | — | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jasmine! It came in at #1,951, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1906–1911, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jasmine is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#11 · 1 in 95
- California#11 · 1 in 151
- New Mexico#12 · 1 in 108
- Nevada#19 · 1 in 141
- Florida#19 · 1 in 148
Best ever in a state: #1 in District of Columbia, 1994.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #11 | 1,526 | 1 in 151 |
| Hawaii | #11 | 35 | 1 in 95 |
| New Mexico | #12 | 77 | 1 in 108 |
| Florida | #19 | 580 | 1 in 148 |
| Nevada | #19 | 82 | 1 in 141 |
| Oklahoma | #19 | 105 | 1 in 159 |
| Oregon | #20 | 113 | 1 in 141 |
| Arizona | #21 | 195 | 1 in 182 |
| Mississippi | #21 | 82 | 1 in 141 |
| Vermont | #21 | 17 | 1 in 93 |
| South Carolina | #22 | 117 | 1 in 149 |
| Texas | #22 | 773 | 1 in 208 |
| Georgia | #23 | 284 | 1 in 181 |
| Alabama | #25 | 126 | 1 in 157 |
| Washington | #26 | 161 | 1 in 182 |
| Arkansas | #27 | 77 | 1 in 160 |
| Colorado | #27 | 129 | 1 in 192 |
| Kentucky | #27 | 123 | 1 in 160 |
| Louisiana | #27 | 106 | 1 in 186 |
| District of Columbia | #29 | 25 | 1 in 125 |
| Maryland | #29 | 141 | 1 in 176 |
| North Carolina | #29 | 261 | 1 in 174 |
| Alaska | #30 | 16 | 1 in 144 |
| Virginia | #30 | 199 | 1 in 186 |
| West Virginia | #30 | 44 | 1 in 156 |
| Tennessee | #32 | 165 | 1 in 188 |
| Illinois | #37 | 280 | 1 in 240 |
| Wyoming | #40 | 11 | 1 in 120 |
| Idaho | #41 | 34 | 1 in 202 |
| New York | #45 | 363 | 1 in 262 |
| Indiana | #46 | 141 | 1 in 231 |
| Kansas | #46 | 61 | 1 in 226 |
| Nebraska | #46 | 42 | 1 in 197 |
| Rhode Island | #46 | 21 | 1 in 179 |
| Delaware | #50 | 17 | 1 in 182 |
| Minnesota | #50 | 105 | 1 in 248 |
| Michigan | #51 | 177 | 1 in 268 |
| Missouri | #51 | 122 | 1 in 238 |
| Maine | #52 | 21 | 1 in 209 |
| New Jersey | #53 | 147 | 1 in 276 |
| Iowa | #54 | 52 | 1 in 263 |
| Massachusetts | #55 | 107 | 1 in 266 |
| Ohio | #56 | 207 | 1 in 277 |
| North Dakota | #59 | 12 | 1 in 201 |
| Montana | #61 | 13 | 1 in 217 |
| Wisconsin | #61 | 86 | 1 in 291 |
| Utah | #63 | 58 | 1 in 317 |
| New Hampshire | #70 | 18 | 1 in 246 |
| Pennsylvania | #70 | 161 | 1 in 341 |
| Connecticut | #72 | 46 | 1 in 309 |
| South Dakota | #80 | 12 | 1 in 268 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jasmine
- 7 spots since 2024 (#199 → #206)
- 66 spots since 2020 (#140 → #206)
- 96 spots since 2015 (#110 → #206)
- Biggest jump: 330 spots in 1973 (#1,192 → #862)
- Biggest drop: 30 spots in 2021 (#140 → #170)
- Debuted 1906
- Peaked 1993 at #23 (12,063 births)
- Births halved by 2008, 15 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 28 yrs · run 1986–2012
- Top 1,000: 53 yrs · run 1973–2025
- Highest: 1 in 150 girls born in 1993 were named Jasmine (0.67%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,085 girls born in 2025 (0.09%)
- 40.7% of all girls named Jasmine (105,322) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | #1,951 (1906) | #1,951 |
| 1910s | 38 | #2,360 (1912) | #3,203 |
| 1920s | 46 | #2,489 (1925) | #3,501 |
| 1930s | 21 | #3,109 (1933) | #3,602 |
| 1940s | 11 | #4,556 (1945) | #4,604 |
| 1950s | 327 | #1,507 (1957) | #1,868 |
| 1960s | 346 | #1,635 (1969) | #2,054 |
| 1970s | 4,133 | #245 (1979) | #719 |
| 1980s | 32,952 | #30 (1989) | #128 |
| 1990s | 105,322 | #23 (1993) | #26 |
| 2000s | 76,080 | #25 (2001) | #32 |
| 2010s | 29,393 | #62 (2010) | #105 |
| 2020s | 9,952 | #140 (2020) | #180 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jasmine in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 235 of them was named Jasmine, which outranked 99.8% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 105,121 of them was named Jasmine, which outranked 66.6% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #4,326Xzavior20
- #4,326Zabdiel20
- #4,326Zachari20
- #4,464Jasmine19
- #4,464Aaryn19
- #4,464Abdel19
- #4,464Abdulmalik19
- #4,631Aleksei18
- #4,631Alixander18
- #4,631Allister18
Tied with 166 names at #4,464; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.