Jax
- #7,885 for girls in 2025, 13 births
- #342 for boys in 2025, 961 births
- Given to boys 99.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2014 · 1,855 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 25,085since 1995
Jax over time
Rank among boys' names. Jax has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,885 | 13 | #342 | 961 |
| 2024 | #12,161 | 7 | #313 | 1,095 |
| 2023 | #7,640 | 14 | #287 | 1,161 |
| 2022 | #6,707 | 17 | #271 | 1,272 |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | #243 | 1,455 |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | #246 | 1,424 |
| 2019 | #7,342 | 15 | #237 | 1,600 |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 | #214 | 1,767 |
| 2017 | #8,776 | 12 | #222 | 1,725 |
| 2016 | #5,985 | 21 | #215 | 1,813 |
| 2015 | #3,915 | 38 | #215 | 1,865 |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 | #208 | 1,855 |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 | #222 | 1,685 |
| 2012 | #11,257 | 9 | #305 | 1,123 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | #321 | 990 |
| 2010 | #9,790 | 11 | #348 | 882 |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | #426 | 675 |
| 2008 | — | #693 | 343 | |
| 2007 | — | #815 | 262 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,003 | 183 | |
| 2005 | — | #990 | 174 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,013 | 162 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,233 | 117 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,433 | 90 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,460 | 84 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,609 | 73 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,342 | 89 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,488 | 74 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,672 | 59 | |
| 1996 | — | #3,202 | 22 | |
| 1995 | — | #8,868 | 5 | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jax! It came in at #8,868, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1995, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jax is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#145 · 1 in 427
- North Dakota#152 · 1 in 420
- Utah#158 · 1 in 578
- Iowa#191 · 1 in 659
- Nevada#213 · 1 in 807
Best ever in a state: #55 in Wyoming, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #145 | 9 | 1 in 427 |
| North Dakota | #152 | 8 | 1 in 420 |
| Utah | #158 | 34 | 1 in 578 |
| Iowa | #191 | 21 | 1 in 659 |
| Nevada | #213 | 14 | 1 in 807 |
| Idaho | #214 | 12 | 1 in 719 |
| Maine | #234 | 5 | 1 in 769 |
| Minnesota | #243 | 25 | 1 in 980 |
| Arizona | #266 | 30 | 1 in 1,091 |
| Louisiana | #266 | 19 | 1 in 1,007 |
| Nebraska | #266 | 9 | 1 in 980 |
| Virginia | #276 | 31 | 1 in 1,202 |
| Oregon | #281 | 15 | 1 in 1,004 |
| Missouri | #291 | 23 | 1 in 1,209 |
| Tennessee | #299 | 29 | 1 in 1,268 |
| California | #304 | 121 | 1 in 1,450 |
| Kentucky | #319 | 16 | 1 in 1,284 |
| Florida | #321 | 61 | 1 in 1,566 |
| Washington | #321 | 23 | 1 in 1,426 |
| Michigan | #330 | 27 | 1 in 1,489 |
| West Virginia | #330 | 5 | 1 in 1,232 |
| Pennsylvania | #342 | 32 | 1 in 1,633 |
| Maryland | #344 | 15 | 1 in 1,526 |
| Ohio | #349 | 32 | 1 in 1,642 |
| Indiana | #350 | 21 | 1 in 1,508 |
| New Mexico | #360 | 5 | 1 in 1,300 |
| New Jersey | #377 | 21 | 1 in 1,894 |
| Georgia | #393 | 29 | 1 in 1,732 |
| Wisconsin | #393 | 13 | 1 in 1,802 |
| Arkansas | #398 | 8 | 1 in 1,573 |
| Texas | #403 | 88 | 1 in 1,989 |
| Colorado | #420 | 14 | 1 in 1,918 |
| Oklahoma | #426 | 10 | 1 in 1,768 |
| Kansas | #428 | 8 | 1 in 1,756 |
| North Carolina | #431 | 25 | 1 in 2,059 |
| Alabama | #450 | 11 | 1 in 1,956 |
| South Carolina | #501 | 9 | 1 in 2,355 |
| Massachusetts | #507 | 9 | 1 in 3,002 |
| Mississippi | #522 | 5 | 1 in 2,167 |
| New York | #545 | 29 | 1 in 2,911 |
| Illinois | #568 | 16 | 1 in 3,097 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jax
- 96 spots since 2020 (#246 → #342)
- Biggest jump: 267 spots in 2009
- Biggest drop: 29 spots in 2025
- Debuted 1995
- Peaked 2014 at #208 (1,855 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 20 yrs · run 2007–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,028 boys born in 2015 were named Jax (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,777 boys born in 2025 (0.06%)
- Its best rank, #208 in 2014, was only 1 in 1,036 (0.10%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 61.0% of all boys named Jax (15,305) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 249 | #1,342 (1999) | #3,314 |
| 2000s | 2,163 | #426 (2009) | #1,068 |
| 2010s | 15,305 | #208 (2014) | #251 |
| 2020s | 7,368 | #243 (2021) | #284 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jax ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: