Jaxon
- #11,932 for girls in 2025, 7 births
- #115 for boys in 2025, 3,073 births
- Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2018 · 7,774 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 15 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 113,651since 1972
Jaxon over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #11,932 | 7 | #115 | 3,073 |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | #96 | 3,630 |
| 2023 | #7,640 | 14 | #86 | 3,945 |
| 2022 | #8,542 | 12 | #67 | 4,854 |
| 2021 | #9,562 | 10 | #54 | 5,750 |
| 2020 | #7,212 | 15 | #48 | 6,169 |
| 2019 | #5,612 | 22 | #42 | 7,281 |
| 2018 | #5,152 | 25 | #39 | 7,774 |
| 2017 | #5,821 | 21 | #43 | 7,725 |
| 2016 | #6,186 | 20 | #41 | 8,145 |
| 2015 | #5,653 | 23 | #44 | 8,082 |
| 2014 | #5,797 | 22 | #46 | 7,729 |
| 2013 | #4,422 | 32 | #45 | 7,563 |
| 2012 | #5,710 | 23 | #66 | 6,316 |
| 2011 | #6,335 | 20 | #86 | 4,738 |
| 2010 | #6,641 | 19 | #99 | 3,843 |
| 2009 | #9,379 | 12 | #124 | 3,392 |
| 2008 | #6,799 | 19 | #153 | 2,558 |
| 2007 | #6,552 | 20 | #190 | 2,132 |
| 2006 | #7,868 | 15 | #212 | 1,786 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #230 | 1,488 |
| 2004 | #8,716 | 12 | #266 | 1,225 |
| 2003 | #12,408 | 7 | #284 | 1,098 |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | #311 | 920 |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #395 | 639 |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #477 | 493 |
| 1999 | — | #545 | 371 | |
| 1998 | — | #688 | 244 | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #859 | 164 |
| 1996 | — | #1,071 | 113 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,380 | 73 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,383 | 71 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,680 | 52 | |
| 1992 | — | #2,085 | 37 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,344 | 30 | |
| 1990 | — | #3,607 | 16 | |
| 1989 | — | #4,527 | 11 | |
| 1988 | — | #4,786 | 9 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,731 | 12 | |
| 1986 | — | #3,653 | 12 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,052 | 10 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,459 | 12 | |
| 1983 | — | #6,238 | 5 | |
| 1982 | — | #4,234 | 9 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,961 | 7 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,615 | 11 | |
| 1979 | — | #4,068 | 9 | |
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | #5,845 | 5 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | #5,464 | 5 | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | #5,101 | 5 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,986 | 5 | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1972
The first year at least five boys were named Jaxon! It came in at #4,986, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1972–1978, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaxon is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Mississippi#24 · 1 in 184
- West Virginia#48 · 1 in 205
- Rhode Island#52 · 1 in 184
- Hawaii#63 · 1 in 224
- South Dakota#64 · 1 in 226
Best ever in a state: #2 in Oklahoma, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #24 | 59 | 1 in 184 |
| West Virginia | #48 | 30 | 1 in 205 |
| Rhode Island | #52 | 17 | 1 in 184 |
| Hawaii | #63 | 13 | 1 in 224 |
| South Dakota | #64 | 17 | 1 in 226 |
| Kentucky | #70 | 66 | 1 in 311 |
| Tennessee | #84 | 101 | 1 in 364 |
| Idaho | #85 | 27 | 1 in 320 |
| Louisiana | #85 | 55 | 1 in 348 |
| Alabama | #87 | 58 | 1 in 371 |
| Connecticut | #90 | 39 | 1 in 339 |
| Delaware | #93 | 11 | 1 in 268 |
| Nevada | #98 | 31 | 1 in 364 |
| Iowa | #99 | 37 | 1 in 374 |
| Missouri | #103 | 65 | 1 in 428 |
| New York | #103 | 170 | 1 in 497 |
| North Carolina | #103 | 119 | 1 in 433 |
| Ohio | #103 | 125 | 1 in 420 |
| Pennsylvania | #103 | 122 | 1 in 428 |
| Arizona | #106 | 77 | 1 in 425 |
| North Dakota | #107 | 11 | 1 in 305 |
| Wisconsin | #107 | 56 | 1 in 418 |
| Florida | #108 | 207 | 1 in 462 |
| Oregon | #108 | 35 | 1 in 430 |
| Oklahoma | #109 | 43 | 1 in 411 |
| Alaska | #110 | 7 | 1 in 325 |
| Arkansas | #113 | 30 | 1 in 420 |
| Michigan | #114 | 86 | 1 in 467 |
| Georgia | #118 | 96 | 1 in 523 |
| Kansas | #119 | 32 | 1 in 439 |
| New Jersey | #120 | 79 | 1 in 503 |
| Washington | #121 | 65 | 1 in 505 |
| Maine | #126 | 10 | 1 in 384 |
| Montana | #127 | 10 | 1 in 376 |
| New Hampshire | #130 | 11 | 1 in 409 |
| South Carolina | #131 | 42 | 1 in 505 |
| Maryland | #134 | 44 | 1 in 520 |
| New Mexico | #134 | 14 | 1 in 464 |
| Texas | #134 | 292 | 1 in 599 |
| Nebraska | #136 | 19 | 1 in 464 |
| Indiana | #137 | 60 | 1 in 528 |
| California | #138 | 288 | 1 in 609 |
| Virginia | #142 | 63 | 1 in 591 |
| Illinois | #151 | 79 | 1 in 627 |
| Colorado | #158 | 45 | 1 in 597 |
| Massachusetts | #166 | 40 | 1 in 676 |
| Minnesota | #193 | 34 | 1 in 721 |
| Utah | #198 | 27 | 1 in 728 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaxon
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 67 spots since 2020 (#48 → #115)
- Biggest jump: 212 spots in 1997
- Biggest drop: 19 spots in 2023
Rise & fade · boys
46 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 2018 at #39 (7,774 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 15 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 15 yrs · run 2010–2024
- Top 1,000: 29 yrs · run 1997–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 233
- Highest: 1 in 233 boys born in 2016 were named Jaxon (0.43%)
- Latest: 1 in 556 boys born in 2025 (0.18%)
- Its best rank, #39 in 2018, was only 1 in 234 (0.43%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 60.9% of all boys named Jaxon (69,196) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 34 | #4,068 (1979) | #5,206 |
| 1980s | 98 | #3,459 (1984) | #4,326 |
| 1990s | 1,171 | #545 (1999) | #1,564 |
| 2000s | 15,731 | #124 (2009) | #264 |
| 2010s | 69,196 | #39 (2018) | #55 |
| 2020s | 27,421 | #48 (2020) | #78 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaxon ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: