Jaycee
- #1,150 for girls in 2025, 201 births
- #2,480 for boys in 2025, 54 births
- Given to girls 87.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2011 · 568 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,099since 1968
Jaycee over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,150 | 201 | #2,480 | 54 |
| 2024 | #878 | 307 | #2,393 | 58 |
| 2023 | #878 | 306 | #2,480 | 54 |
| 2022 | #1,011 | 258 | #2,191 | 66 |
| 2021 | #896 | 302 | #2,499 | 53 |
| 2020 | #964 | 264 | #2,024 | 70 |
| 2019 | #826 | 329 | #2,993 | 40 |
| 2018 | #856 | 316 | #2,893 | 41 |
| 2017 | #805 | 340 | #2,417 | 53 |
| 2016 | #713 | 399 | #2,066 | 68 |
| 2015 | #650 | 442 | #2,386 | 54 |
| 2014 | #619 | 463 | #2,582 | 47 |
| 2013 | #554 | 528 | #2,562 | 47 |
| 2012 | #547 | 543 | #3,625 | 29 |
| 2011 | #516 | 568 | #3,000 | 38 |
| 2010 | #521 | 572 | #3,531 | 30 |
| 2009 | #620 | 487 | #2,800 | 43 |
| 2008 | #647 | 477 | #3,103 | 37 |
| 2007 | #762 | 384 | #2,684 | 45 |
| 2006 | #773 | 356 | #3,306 | 32 |
| 2005 | #792 | 328 | #3,528 | 27 |
| 2004 | #898 | 270 | #2,953 | 34 |
| 2003 | #857 | 282 | #3,626 | 24 |
| 2002 | #818 | 284 | #2,685 | 35 |
| 2001 | #850 | 269 | #2,429 | 40 |
| 2000 | #852 | 258 | #2,993 | 29 |
| 1999 | #867 | 248 | #2,199 | 42 |
| 1998 | #991 | 203 | #3,708 | 19 |
| 1997 | #1,030 | 186 | #2,680 | 29 |
| 1996 | #1,155 | 157 | #2,679 | 28 |
| 1995 | #1,588 | 95 | #3,100 | 22 |
| 1994 | #1,557 | 99 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #1,565 | 99 | #3,661 | 17 |
| 1992 | #1,622 | 94 | #2,834 | 24 |
| 1991 | #1,677 | 88 | #3,462 | 17 |
| 1990 | #2,900 | 39 | #3,309 | 18 |
| 1989 | #3,330 | 31 | #2,902 | 21 |
| 1988 | #3,690 | 25 | #3,079 | 17 |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | #3,201 | 15 |
| 1986 | #4,724 | 16 | #3,882 | 11 |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 | #3,599 | 12 |
| 1984 | #4,318 | 17 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #4,286 | 17 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 | — | |
| 1980 | #4,978 | 14 | #4,495 | 8 |
| 1979 | #3,333 | 24 | — | |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #3,857 | 9 |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | — | |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #3,837 | 8 |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | #4,054 | 7 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | #4,048 | 5 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #4,038 | 5 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,988 | 5 | |
| 1958 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,552 | 6 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,143 | 7 | |
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | #2,608 | 9 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,370 | 6 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #3,113 | 6 | |
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1968
The first year at least five girls were named Jaycee! It came in at #7,016, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1968–1969, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jaycee is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #437 | 7 | 1 in 1,682 |
| Arkansas | #489 | 6 | 1 in 1,766 |
| Kentucky | #570 | 7 | 1 in 2,464 |
| Tennessee | #603 | 12 | 1 in 2,673 |
| Alabama | #633 | 7 | 1 in 2,617 |
| Louisiana | #677 | 6 | 1 in 2,728 |
| Oklahoma | #697 | 5 | 1 in 2,956 |
| Indiana | #815 | 7 | 1 in 3,987 |
| Michigan | #863 | 8 | 1 in 4,466 |
| Georgia | #915 | 10 | 1 in 4,521 |
| Florida | #959 | 16 | 1 in 5,423 |
| Ohio | #1,035 | 8 | 1 in 5,909 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,108 | 7 | 1 in 6,670 |
| Texas | #1,154 | 23 | 1 in 6,980 |
| Illinois | #1,240 | 6 | 1 in 7,388 |
| North Carolina | #1,437 | 5 | 1 in 9,297 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaycee
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 186 spots since 2020 (#964 → #1,150)
- Biggest jump: 133 spots in 2023
- Biggest drop: 272 spots in 2025
Rise & fade · girls
43 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1968
- Peaked 2011 at #516 (568 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 26 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 26 yrs · run 1998–2021
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,097
- Highest: 1 in 3,097 girls born in 2011 were named Jaycee (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,996 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 40.5% of all girls named Jaycee (4,500) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1988
- Mostly boys until 1987, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5 | #7,016 (1968) | #7,016 |
| 1970s | 89 | #3,333 (1979) | #6,659 |
| 1980s | 164 | #3,330 (1989) | #5,210 |
| 1990s | 1,308 | #867 (1999) | #1,495 |
| 2000s | 3,395 | #620 (2009) | #787 |
| 2010s | 4,500 | #516 (2011) | #661 |
| 2020s | 1,638 | #878 (2024) | #963 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaycee ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: