Jaycie
- #2,036 for girls in 2025, 93 births
- Last seen for boys in 2010 at #12,231
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1996 · 200 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,042since 1972
Jaycie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Jaycie has never cracked the top 900 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,036 | 93 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,248 | 83 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,466 | 72 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,720 | 63 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,460 | 72 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,341 | 75 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,538 | 69 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,238 | 82 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,889 | 107 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,785 | 116 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,964 | 102 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,757 | 118 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,725 | 120 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,719 | 120 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,469 | 152 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,357 | 172 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #1,492 | 153 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,421 | 167 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,445 | 163 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,428 | 158 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,319 | 167 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,470 | 137 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,328 | 154 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,510 | 125 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,411 | 134 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,571 | 113 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,358 | 130 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,443 | 118 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,148 | 162 | — | |
| 1996 | #962 | 200 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,486 | 51 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,935 | 40 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,052 | 38 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,267 | 34 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,301 | 33 | — | |
| 1990 | #5,286 | 17 | — | |
| 1989 | #6,160 | 13 | — | |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | — | |
| 1987 | #4,857 | 16 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,188 | 14 | — | |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | — | |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | — | |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | — | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,254 | 13 | — | |
| 1980 | #6,319 | 10 | — | |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | — | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1972
The first year at least five girls were named Jaycie! It came in at #8,292, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1972–1978, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jaycie is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Missouri#811 · 1 in 4,050
- Texas#1,532 · 1 in 10,703
- Florida#2,151 · 1 in 17,352
- California#2,487 · 1 in 23,103
Best ever in a state: #127 in Hawaii, 2004.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri | #811 | 6 | 1 in 4,050 |
| Texas | #1,532 | 15 | 1 in 10,703 |
| Florida | #2,151 | 5 | 1 in 17,352 |
| California | #2,487 | 7 | 1 in 23,103 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaycie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 305 spots since 2020 (#2,341 → #2,036)
- 72 spots since 2015 (#1,964 → #2,036)
- Biggest jump: 1,524 spots in 1996
- Biggest drop: 186 spots in 1997
Rise & fade · girls
24 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 1996 at #962 (200 births)
- Births halved by 2018, 22 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 1 yr
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 1 yr · 1996
Share of babies · girls
1 in 8,765
- Highest: 1 in 8,765 girls born in 1996 were named Jaycie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 17,282 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 36.4% of all girls named Jaycie (1,471) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 21 | #8,292 (1972) | #9,060 |
| 1980s | 111 | #4,857 (1987) | #6,551 |
| 1990s | 823 | #962 (1996) | #2,524 |
| 2000s | 1,471 | #1,319 (2005) | #1,440 |
| 2010s | 1,158 | #1,357 (2010) | #1,844 |
| 2020s | 458 | #2,036 (2025) | #2,379 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaycie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: