Jayleen
- #1,098 for girls in 2025, 218 births
- Last seen for boys in 2015 at #9,568
- Given to girls 98.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2013 · 793 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 13,048since 1954
Jayleen over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Jayleen has never cracked the top 300 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,098 | 218 | — | |
| 2024 | #978 | 265 | — | |
| 2023 | #790 | 356 | — | |
| 2022 | #611 | 488 | — | |
| 2021 | #565 | 541 | — | |
| 2020 | #549 | 543 | — | |
| 2019 | #561 | 546 | — | |
| 2018 | #506 | 613 | — | |
| 2017 | #470 | 662 | — | |
| 2016 | #445 | 722 | — | |
| 2015 | #425 | 750 | #9,568 | 7 |
| 2014 | #415 | 770 | — | |
| 2013 | #390 | 793 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #409 | 764 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #394 | 802 | — | |
| 2010 | #455 | 679 | #7,591 | 10 |
| 2009 | #553 | 552 | #5,102 | 18 |
| 2008 | #613 | 498 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #774 | 373 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #838 | 320 | #7,998 | 9 |
| 2005 | #958 | 257 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #948 | 254 | #5,492 | 14 |
| 2003 | #1,203 | 177 | #5,877 | 12 |
| 2002 | #1,318 | 148 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #1,253 | 157 | #6,013 | 11 |
| 2000 | #1,602 | 110 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #1,580 | 106 | #3,986 | 18 |
| 1998 | #1,657 | 97 | #6,843 | 8 |
| 1997 | #2,283 | 59 | #6,618 | 8 |
| 1996 | #2,630 | 47 | #7,136 | 7 |
| 1995 | #4,348 | 23 | #5,928 | 9 |
| 1994 | #3,234 | 35 | #7,770 | 6 |
| 1993 | #5,206 | 18 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,968 | 26 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,004 | 19 | — | |
| 1990 | #6,131 | 14 | — | |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | — | |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 | — | |
| 1987 | #6,335 | 11 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | — | |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | — | |
| 1984 | #4,737 | 15 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | — | |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 | — | |
| 1980 | #4,743 | 15 | — | |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | — | |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,892 | 8 | — | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | — | |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | — | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,879 | 12 | — | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | #5,148 | 6 | — | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1954
The first year at least five girls were named Jayleen! It came in at #5,148, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1955–1958, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jayleen is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- California#404 · 1 in 1,997
- Nevada#433 · 1 in 1,534
- Arizona#632 · 1 in 2,822
- Texas#663 · 1 in 3,490
- Illinois#1,240 · 1 in 7,388
Best ever in a state: #110 in California, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #404 | 81 | 1 in 1,997 |
| Nevada | #433 | 6 | 1 in 1,534 |
| Arizona | #632 | 10 | 1 in 2,822 |
| Texas | #663 | 46 | 1 in 3,490 |
| Illinois | #1,240 | 6 | 1 in 7,388 |
| Florida | #1,243 | 11 | 1 in 7,887 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,392 | 5 | 1 in 9,338 |
| New York | #1,830 | 6 | 1 in 13,055 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jayleen
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 549 spots since 2020 (#549 → #1,098)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 2004
- Biggest drop: 188 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · girls
59 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1954
- Peaked 2013 at #390 (793 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 10 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 21 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 21 yrs · run 2004–2024
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,193
- Highest: 1 in 2,193 girls born in 2011 were named Jayleen (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,373 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #390 in 2013, was only 1 in 2,213 (0.05%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 54.4% of all girls named Jayleen (7,101) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 21 | #4,031 (1959) | #5,044 |
| 1960s | 49 | #3,879 (1964) | #5,644 |
| 1970s | 61 | #5,543 (1971) | #7,530 |
| 1980s | 115 | #4,737 (1984) | #6,099 |
| 1990s | 444 | #1,580 (1999) | #3,604 |
| 2000s | 2,846 | #553 (2009) | #1,006 |
| 2010s | 7,101 | #390 (2013) | #447 |
| 2020s | 2,411 | #549 (2020) | #765 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jayleen ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: