Jaylynn
- #2,051 for girls in 2025, 92 births
- #6,446 for boys in 2025, 13 births
- Given to girls 94.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2009 · 635 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,348since 1963
Jaylynn over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,051 | 92 | #6,446 | 13 |
| 2024 | #1,997 | 98 | #7,257 | 11 |
| 2023 | #1,903 | 104 | #6,220 | 14 |
| 2022 | #1,548 | 138 | #8,990 | 8 |
| 2021 | #1,506 | 140 | #5,562 | 16 |
| 2020 | #1,334 | 165 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #1,218 | 192 | #7,643 | 10 |
| 2018 | #1,032 | 250 | #5,320 | 17 |
| 2017 | #1,033 | 250 | #4,935 | 19 |
| 2016 | #854 | 330 | #8,146 | 9 |
| 2015 | #722 | 394 | #4,711 | 20 |
| 2014 | #673 | 423 | #5,252 | 17 |
| 2013 | #622 | 449 | #5,923 | 14 |
| 2012 | #594 | 489 | #5,256 | 17 |
| 2011 | #548 | 532 | #3,885 | 26 |
| 2010 | #496 | 603 | #3,708 | 28 |
| 2009 | #484 | 635 | #3,332 | 33 |
| 2008 | #513 | 600 | #3,286 | 34 |
| 2007 | #544 | 570 | #3,687 | 28 |
| 2006 | #639 | 451 | #3,227 | 33 |
| 2005 | #673 | 413 | #4,062 | 22 |
| 2004 | #761 | 342 | #3,456 | 27 |
| 2003 | #788 | 313 | #3,186 | 29 |
| 2002 | #864 | 265 | #3,909 | 21 |
| 2001 | #993 | 216 | #3,512 | 24 |
| 2000 | #1,142 | 178 | #3,423 | 24 |
| 1999 | #1,258 | 147 | #5,317 | 12 |
| 1998 | #1,526 | 110 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #1,864 | 79 | #5,288 | 11 |
| 1996 | #2,177 | 62 | #5,535 | 10 |
| 1995 | #2,788 | 43 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #2,988 | 39 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #2,938 | 40 | — | |
| 1992 | #5,051 | 19 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 | — | |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | — | |
| 1989 | #5,286 | 16 | — | |
| 1988 | #5,895 | 13 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #4,660 | 17 | — | |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | — | |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | — | |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | — | |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 | — | |
| 1981 | #8,128 | 7 | — | |
| 1980 | #6,789 | 9 | — | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | — | |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | — | |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | — | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | — | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1963
The first year at least five girls were named Jaylynn! It came in at #6,592, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1963–1966, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jaylynn is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Ohio#1,134 · 1 in 6,753
- Georgia#1,533 · 1 in 9,042
- California#1,651 · 1 in 12,440
- Texas#2,038 · 1 in 16,054
Best ever in a state: #132 in Rhode Island, 2009.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | #1,134 | 7 | 1 in 6,753 |
| Georgia | #1,533 | 5 | 1 in 9,042 |
| California | #1,651 | 13 | 1 in 12,440 |
| Texas | #2,038 | 10 | 1 in 16,054 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaylynn
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 717 spots since 2020 (#1,334 → #2,051)
- Biggest jump: 149 spots in 2001
- Biggest drop: 179 spots in 2017
Rise & fade · girls
46 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 2009 at #484 (635 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 16 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 16 yrs · run 2001–2016
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,893
- Highest: 1 in 2,893 girls born in 2009 were named Jaylynn (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 17,470 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 42.6% of all girls named Jaylynn (3,983) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16 | #6,042 (1967) | #6,702 |
| 1970s | 24 | #6,258 (1974) | #8,551 |
| 1980s | 109 | #4,660 (1987) | #6,484 |
| 1990s | 567 | #1,258 (1999) | #3,329 |
| 2000s | 3,983 | #484 (2009) | #740 |
| 2010s | 3,912 | #496 (2010) | #779 |
| 2020s | 737 | #1,334 (2020) | #1,723 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaylynn ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: