Jaymes
- Last seen for girls in 2024 at #8,443
- #5,861 for boys in 2025, 15 births
- Given to boys 94.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1986 · 144 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,430since 1950
Jaymes over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #5,861 | 15 | |
| 2024 | #8,443 | 12 | #4,571 | 22 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #4,886 | 20 |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #4,570 | 22 |
| 2021 | #12,206 | 7 | #4,628 | 21 |
| 2020 | #10,250 | 9 | #3,918 | 26 |
| 2019 | #8,138 | 13 | #3,496 | 32 |
| 2018 | #9,806 | 10 | #3,373 | 33 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #3,006 | 39 |
| 2016 | #7,602 | 15 | #2,838 | 42 |
| 2015 | — | #2,809 | 42 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #2,461 | 51 |
| 2013 | — | #2,804 | 41 | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #2,448 | 51 |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | #2,699 | 44 |
| 2010 | — | #2,069 | 65 | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | #2,585 | 48 |
| 2008 | #13,832 | 7 | #2,405 | 53 |
| 2007 | — | #2,164 | 62 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,698 | 43 | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #2,206 | 54 |
| 2004 | — | #2,238 | 51 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #2,349 | 45 |
| 2002 | — | #2,470 | 40 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #2,742 | 34 |
| 2000 | — | #2,379 | 40 | |
| 1999 | — | #2,398 | 37 | |
| 1998 | — | #2,199 | 41 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,908 | 48 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,842 | 49 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,577 | 59 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,608 | 57 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,472 | 63 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,452 | 63 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,017 | 112 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,188 | 84 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,184 | 81 | |
| 1988 | — | #950 | 103 | |
| 1987 | — | #836 | 124 | |
| 1986 | — | #754 | 144 | |
| 1985 | — | #845 | 113 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,270 | 13 | |
| 1983 | — | #4,141 | 9 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,972 | 15 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,509 | 8 | |
| 1980 | — | #2,831 | 16 | |
| 1979 | — | #5,355 | 6 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,614 | 10 | |
| 1977 | — | #4,164 | 8 | |
| 1976 | — | #4,935 | 6 | |
| 1975 | — | #3,659 | 9 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,837 | 8 | |
| 1973 | — | #3,445 | 9 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,441 | 6 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,973 | 11 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,509 | 14 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,595 | 7 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | #3,948 | 5 | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #2,854 | 9 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | #2,364 | 12 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,652 | 6 | |
| 1960 | — | #3,077 | 8 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | #2,631 | 10 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1950
The first year at least five boys were named Jaymes! It came in at #3,681, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1950–1956, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaymes is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Jaymes in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Jaymes
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 1,943 spots since 2020 (#3,918 → #5,861)
- Biggest jump: 2,425 spots in 1985
- Biggest drop: 234 spots in 1989
Rise & fade · boys
36 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1950
- Peaked 1986 at #754 (144 births)
- Births halved by 1992, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 4 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 4 yrs · run 1985–1988
Share of babies · boys
1 in 12,788
- Highest: 1 in 12,788 boys born in 1986 were named Jaymes (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 113,872 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1980s
- 25.8% of all boys named Jaymes (626) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 15 | #2,631 (1957) | #3,156 |
| 1960s | 53 | #2,364 (1962) | #3,293 |
| 1970s | 87 | #2,509 (1970) | #3,893 |
| 1980s | 626 | #754 (1986) | #2,229 |
| 1990s | 613 | #1,017 (1991) | #1,666 |
| 2000s | 470 | #2,164 (2007) | #2,424 |
| 2010s | 440 | #2,069 (2010) | #2,800 |
| 2020s | 126 | #3,918 (2020) | #4,739 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaymes ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: