Jayson
Last seen for girls in 2018 at #15,682 · #700 for boys in 2025, 384 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1979 · 713 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 35,931since 1922
Jayson over time
Rank among boys' names. Jayson has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #700 | 384 | |
| 2024 | — | #624 | 454 | |
| 2023 | — | #591 | 485 | |
| 2022 | — | #545 | 543 | |
| 2021 | — | #564 | 502 | |
| 2020 | — | #529 | 540 | |
| 2019 | — | #512 | 558 | |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #470 | 620 |
| 2017 | — | #471 | 634 | |
| 2016 | — | #483 | 636 | |
| 2015 | — | #407 | 763 | |
| 2014 | — | #392 | 795 | |
| 2013 | — | #373 | 817 | |
| 2012 | — | #374 | 810 | |
| 2011 | — | #350 | 855 | |
| 2010 | — | #334 | 936 | |
| 2009 | — | #345 | 910 | |
| 2008 | — | #341 | 962 | |
| 2007 | — | #353 | 897 | |
| 2006 | — | #351 | 864 | |
| 2005 | — | #330 | 923 | |
| 2004 | — | #319 | 963 | |
| 2003 | — | #328 | 894 | |
| 2002 | — | #330 | 833 | |
| 2001 | — | #352 | 759 | |
| 2000 | — | #370 | 709 | |
| 1999 | — | #363 | 719 | |
| 1998 | — | #360 | 725 | |
| 1997 | — | #414 | 559 | |
| 1996 | — | #454 | 484 | |
| 1995 | — | #485 | 446 | |
| 1994 | — | #492 | 418 | |
| 1993 | — | #525 | 377 | |
| 1992 | — | #493 | 411 | |
| 1991 | — | #496 | 395 | |
| 1990 | — | #497 | 385 | |
| 1989 | — | #473 | 402 | |
| 1988 | — | #451 | 399 | |
| 1987 | — | #425 | 425 | |
| 1986 | — | #394 | 462 | |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | #357 | 517 |
| 1984 | — | #369 | 477 | |
| 1983 | — | #354 | 502 | |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #328 | 583 |
| 1981 | — | #337 | 550 | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | #315 | 608 |
| 1979 | — | #283 | 713 | |
| 1978 | — | #302 | 598 | |
| 1977 | — | #299 | 648 | |
| 1976 | — | #298 | 610 | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #306 | 615 |
| 1974 | — | #298 | 625 | |
| 1973 | — | #305 | 573 | |
| 1972 | — | #366 | 461 | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #388 | 431 |
| 1970 | — | #402 | 403 | |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #492 | 246 |
| 1968 | — | #649 | 135 | |
| 1967 | — | #696 | 114 | |
| 1966 | — | #730 | 102 | |
| 1965 | — | #777 | 90 | |
| 1964 | — | #989 | 58 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,027 | 54 | |
| 1962 | — | #984 | 60 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,196 | 44 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,115 | 49 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,034 | 55 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,104 | 48 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,151 | 45 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,218 | 39 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,682 | 21 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,668 | 21 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,508 | 25 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,939 | 16 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,643 | 21 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,879 | 16 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,820 | 17 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,218 | 12 | |
| 1947 | — | #2,251 | 12 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,919 | 7 | |
| 1945 | — | #3,338 | 5 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,633 | 8 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,964 | 7 | |
| 1942 | — | #3,560 | 5 | |
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,130 | 6 | |
| 1939 | — | #3,480 | 5 | |
| 1938 | — | #3,175 | 6 | |
| 1937 | — | #3,518 | 5 | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | #4,307 | 5 | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jayson! It came in at #4,307, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1922–1937, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jayson is popular in 1987
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#152 · 1 in 749
- Idaho#159 · 1 in 937
- Washington#197 · 1 in 1,510
- Utah#205 · 1 in 1,441
- Iowa#241 · 1 in 2,529
Best ever in a state: #73 in Rhode Island, 1977.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #152 | 9 | 1 in 749 |
| Idaho | #159 | 7 | 1 in 937 |
| Washington | #197 | 21 | 1 in 1,510 |
| Utah | #205 | 11 | 1 in 1,441 |
| Iowa | #241 | 7 | 1 in 2,529 |
| Massachusetts | #246 | 15 | 1 in 2,720 |
| Oregon | #259 | 8 | 1 in 2,218 |
| Arizona | #262 | 15 | 1 in 1,892 |
| New Jersey | #268 | 21 | 1 in 2,377 |
| Michigan | #323 | 18 | 1 in 3,591 |
| Oklahoma | #323 | 7 | 1 in 2,969 |
| Minnesota | #337 | 6 | 1 in 5,082 |
| Indiana | #369 | 8 | 1 in 4,616 |
| New York | #376 | 34 | 1 in 3,695 |
| Ohio | #376 | 15 | 1 in 5,085 |
| California | #425 | 55 | 1 in 4,341 |
| Pennsylvania | #427 | 12 | 1 in 6,466 |
| Colorado | #431 | 5 | 1 in 4,913 |
| Florida | #451 | 17 | 1 in 4,678 |
| Texas | #451 | 35 | 1 in 4,098 |
| Virginia | #455 | 7 | 1 in 5,632 |
| Illinois | #470 | 17 | 1 in 4,806 |
| Missouri | #482 | 5 | 1 in 7,148 |
| North Carolina | #534 | 6 | 1 in 6,919 |
| Georgia | #679 | 5 | 1 in 9,111 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jayson
- 76 spots since 2024 (#624 → #700)
- 171 spots since 2020 (#529 → #700)
- 293 spots since 2015 (#407 → #700)
- Biggest jump: 212 spots in 1962 (#1,196 → #984)
- Biggest drop: 76 spots in 2016 (#407 → #483)
- Debuted 1922
- Peaked 1979 at #283 (713 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 63 yrs · run 1964–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,050 boys born in 2010 were named Jayson (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,448 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #283 in 1979, was only 1 in 2,414 (0.04%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 24.3% of all boys named Jayson (8,714) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 5 | #4,307 (1922) | #4,307 |
| 1930s | 16 | #3,175 (1938) | #3,391 |
| 1940s | 84 | #1,820 (1949) | #2,834 |
| 1950s | 307 | #1,034 (1959) | #1,483 |
| 1960s | 952 | #492 (1969) | #866 |
| 1970s | 5,677 | #283 (1979) | #325 |
| 1980s | 4,925 | #315 (1980) | #380 |
| 1990s | 4,919 | #360 (1998) | #458 |
| 2000s | 8,714 | #319 (2004) | #342 |
| 2010s | 7,424 | #334 (2010) | #417 |
| 2020s | 2,908 | #529 (2020) | #592 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jayson in 1987
Top boys' names in 1987
More about 1987
boys
1,866,984 boys got a published name in 1987; 1 in 4,393 of them was named Jayson, which outranked 94.8% of the 8,152 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.