Jazel
- #11,932 for girls in 2025, 7 births
- Last seen for boys in 2022 at #12,330
- Given to girls 97.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2009 · 50 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 672since 1986
Jazel over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Jazel has never cracked the top 3,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #11,932 | 7 | — | |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | — | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | — | |
| 2022 | — | #12,330 | 5 | |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #12,146 | 5 |
| 2020 | #6,083 | 19 | — | |
| 2019 | #7,025 | 16 | — | |
| 2018 | #6,521 | 18 | — | |
| 2017 | #6,808 | 17 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,632 | 30 | — | |
| 2015 | #4,853 | 28 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,892 | 28 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,834 | 22 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,486 | 32 | — | |
| 2011 | #4,072 | 36 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,816 | 40 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,298 | 50 | — | |
| 2008 | #4,006 | 39 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #5,097 | 28 | — | |
| 2006 | #4,165 | 35 | — | |
| 2005 | #3,942 | 36 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #4,816 | 27 | — | |
| 2003 | #6,576 | 17 | — | |
| 2002 | #6,392 | 17 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #6,487 | 16 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | — | |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | — | |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | — | |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | — | |
| 1995 | #8,079 | 10 | — | |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | — | |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | — | |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1986
The first year at least five girls were named Jazel! It came in at #10,912, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1986–1988, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jazel is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Jazel in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Jazel
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 810 spots since 2024 (#11,122 → #11,932)
- 5,849 spots since 2020 (#6,083 → #11,932)
- 7,079 spots since 2015 (#4,853 → #11,932)
Rise & fade · girls
23 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1986
- Peaked 2009 at #3,298 (50 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 4 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 36,742
- Highest: 1 in 36,742 girls born in 2009 were named Jazel (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 229,610 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 41.5% of all girls named Jazel (279) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 11 | #10,847 (1989) | #10,880 |
| 1990s | 67 | #7,574 (1996) | #9,928 |
| 2000s | 279 | #3,298 (2009) | #5,210 |
| 2010s | 267 | #3,816 (2010) | #5,294 |
| 2020s | 48 | #6,083 (2020) | #10,749 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jazel ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: