Jazmin
- #710 for girls in 2025, 395 births
- Last seen for boys in 2011 at #10,808
- Given to girls 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2006 · 2,240 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 44,421since 1962
Jazmin over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Jazmin has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #710 | 395 | — | |
| 2024 | #653 | 450 | — | |
| 2023 | #645 | 453 | — | |
| 2022 | #693 | 424 | — | |
| 2021 | #710 | 405 | — | |
| 2020 | #638 | 454 | — | |
| 2019 | #591 | 514 | — | |
| 2018 | #603 | 502 | — | |
| 2017 | #526 | 592 | — | |
| 2016 | #453 | 708 | — | |
| 2015 | #433 | 731 | — | |
| 2014 | #398 | 820 | — | |
| 2013 | #384 | 808 | — | |
| 2012 | #355 | 895 | — | |
| 2011 | #302 | 1,054 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #250 | 1,286 | — | |
| 2009 | #209 | 1,544 | — | |
| 2008 | #207 | 1,638 | — | |
| 2007 | #185 | 1,833 | — | |
| 2006 | #155 | 2,240 | — | |
| 2005 | #186 | 1,865 | — | |
| 2004 | #185 | 1,857 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #196 | 1,676 | #7,245 | 9 |
| 2002 | #209 | 1,574 | — | |
| 2001 | #205 | 1,582 | — | |
| 2000 | #227 | 1,391 | #10,349 | 5 |
| 1999 | #220 | 1,435 | #7,874 | 7 |
| 1998 | #208 | 1,479 | #6,314 | 9 |
| 1997 | #205 | 1,429 | #6,618 | 8 |
| 1996 | #216 | 1,343 | #5,187 | 11 |
| 1995 | #194 | 1,518 | #5,928 | 9 |
| 1994 | #190 | 1,544 | #3,215 | 21 |
| 1993 | #202 | 1,457 | #3,501 | 18 |
| 1992 | #255 | 1,098 | #4,872 | 11 |
| 1991 | #251 | 1,109 | #3,325 | 18 |
| 1990 | #302 | 910 | #3,779 | 15 |
| 1989 | #368 | 695 | #3,809 | 14 |
| 1988 | #421 | 557 | #4,786 | 9 |
| 1987 | #465 | 469 | #3,521 | 13 |
| 1986 | #587 | 328 | #4,853 | 8 |
| 1985 | #689 | 259 | #3,805 | 11 |
| 1984 | #914 | 163 | — | |
| 1983 | #918 | 162 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #1,053 | 137 | — | |
| 1981 | #987 | 148 | #6,262 | 5 |
| 1980 | #1,136 | 120 | #5,525 | 6 |
| 1979 | #1,482 | 80 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,765 | 58 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,832 | 55 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,334 | 35 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,411 | 33 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,999 | 42 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,689 | 26 | — | |
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | — | |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1962
The first year at least five girls were named Jazmin! It came in at #5,293, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1963–1965, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jazmin is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Mexico#296 · 1 in 935
- California#413 · 1 in 2,022
- Connecticut#459 · 1 in 1,917
- Maryland#511 · 1 in 1,999
- Washington#541 · 1 in 2,405
Best ever in a state: #65 in Arizona, 2006.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #296 | 5 | 1 in 935 |
| California | #413 | 80 | 1 in 2,022 |
| Connecticut | #459 | 6 | 1 in 1,917 |
| Maryland | #511 | 10 | 1 in 1,999 |
| Washington | #541 | 12 | 1 in 2,405 |
| Arizona | #546 | 12 | 1 in 2,352 |
| Texas | #546 | 58 | 1 in 2,768 |
| Oregon | #548 | 6 | 1 in 2,175 |
| New York | #567 | 29 | 1 in 2,701 |
| Florida | #598 | 29 | 1 in 2,992 |
| Illinois | #667 | 14 | 1 in 3,166 |
| Massachusetts | #682 | 7 | 1 in 3,433 |
| Virginia | #704 | 10 | 1 in 3,374 |
| Indiana | #721 | 8 | 1 in 3,489 |
| North Carolina | #729 | 13 | 1 in 3,576 |
| Kentucky | #744 | 5 | 1 in 3,450 |
| New Jersey | #774 | 9 | 1 in 3,944 |
| Louisiana | #776 | 5 | 1 in 3,274 |
| Tennessee | #813 | 8 | 1 in 4,009 |
| Minnesota | #835 | 5 | 1 in 4,296 |
| Georgia | #984 | 9 | 1 in 5,023 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,108 | 7 | 1 in 6,670 |
| Ohio | #1,271 | 6 | 1 in 7,878 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jazmin
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 72 spots since 2020 (#638 → #710)
- Biggest jump: 225 spots in 1985
- Biggest drop: 77 spots in 2018
Rise & fade · girls
44 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1962
- Peaked 2006 at #155 (2,240 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 44 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 44 yrs · run 1983–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 849
- Highest: 1 in 849 girls born in 2006 were named Jazmin (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,069 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 38.7% of all girls named Jazmin (17,200) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18 | #5,293 (1962) | #6,039 |
| 1970s | 352 | #1,482 (1979) | #3,297 |
| 1980s | 3,038 | #368 (1989) | #754 |
| 1990s | 13,322 | #190 (1994) | #224 |
| 2000s | 17,200 | #155 (2006) | #196 |
| 2010s | 7,910 | #250 (2010) | #430 |
| 2020s | 2,581 | #638 (2020) | #675 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jazmin ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: