Jeanne
#4,546 for girls in 2025, 30 births · Last seen for boys in 1976 at #5,587
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1946 · 4,045 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 19 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 163,249since 1880
Jeanne over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,546 | 30 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,294 | 33 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,763 | 40 | — | |
| 2022 | #4,472 | 31 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,678 | 41 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,676 | 40 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,611 | 42 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,346 | 47 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,996 | 37 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,083 | 36 | — | |
| 2015 | #3,767 | 40 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,178 | 35 | — | |
| 2013 | #4,156 | 35 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,711 | 42 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,843 | 39 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,816 | 40 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,561 | 45 | — | |
| 2008 | #3,478 | 47 | — | |
| 2007 | #3,786 | 42 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,368 | 48 | — | |
| 2005 | #3,009 | 53 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,481 | 68 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,673 | 59 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,263 | 72 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,635 | 57 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,122 | 76 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,258 | 66 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,675 | 95 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,530 | 105 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,571 | 100 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,522 | 102 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,465 | 108 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,495 | 106 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,357 | 122 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,039 | 176 | — | |
| 1990 | #962 | 195 | — | |
| 1989 | #893 | 206 | — | |
| 1988 | #851 | 211 | — | |
| 1987 | #802 | 218 | — | |
| 1986 | #749 | 232 | — | |
| 1985 | #643 | 289 | — | |
| 1984 | #598 | 300 | — | |
| 1983 | #559 | 325 | — | |
| 1982 | #494 | 412 | — | |
| 1981 | #486 | 431 | — | |
| 1980 | #493 | 419 | — | |
| 1979 | #466 | 432 | — | |
| 1978 | #415 | 488 | — | |
| 1977 | #381 | 554 | — | |
| 1976 | #371 | 557 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #323 | 702 | — | |
| 1974 | #289 | 825 | — | |
| 1973 | #288 | 845 | — | |
| 1972 | #274 | 945 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #235 | 1,270 | — | |
| 1970 | #204 | 1,582 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #219 | 1,378 | — | |
| 1968 | #211 | 1,424 | — | |
| 1967 | #198 | 1,608 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1966 | #177 | 1,866 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1965 | #166 | 2,147 | — | |
| 1964 | #156 | 2,467 | #2,409 | 12 |
| 1963 | #145 | 2,801 | #4,048 | 5 |
| 1962 | #142 | 3,013 | #2,364 | 12 |
| 1961 | #138 | 3,331 | #3,097 | 8 |
| 1960 | #129 | 3,505 | #3,665 | 6 |
| 1959 | #129 | 3,516 | #3,290 | 7 |
| 1958 | #123 | 3,609 | #3,944 | 5 |
| 1957 | #117 | 3,950 | #3,024 | 8 |
| 1956 | #112 | 3,910 | #2,497 | 11 |
| 1955 | #115 | 3,732 | — | |
| 1954 | #112 | 3,770 | #3,176 | 7 |
| 1953 | #97 | 3,853 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #98 | 3,827 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1951 | #98 | 3,768 | #2,662 | 9 |
| 1950 | #95 | 3,736 | #3,681 | 5 |
| 1949 | #92 | 3,865 | #2,225 | 12 |
| 1948 | #95 | 3,789 | #2,788 | 8 |
| 1947 | #86 | 4,364 | #3,096 | 7 |
| 1946 | #83 | 4,045 | #2,919 | 7 |
| 1945 | #98 | 2,861 | #2,574 | 8 |
| 1944 | #108 | 2,495 | #2,309 | 10 |
| 1943 | #113 | 2,423 | #2,563 | 9 |
| 1942 | #119 | 2,288 | — | |
| 1941 | #125 | 2,060 | #2,083 | 12 |
| 1940 | #129 | 1,927 | #1,983 | 13 |
| 1939 | #147 | 1,551 | #2,609 | 8 |
| 1938 | #148 | 1,552 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #149 | 1,496 | — | |
| 1936 | #141 | 1,534 | #2,854 | 7 |
| 1935 | #133 | 1,662 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #131 | 1,763 | #2,266 | 11 |
| 1933 | #125 | 1,824 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #112 | 2,131 | #3,092 | 7 |
| 1931 | #98 | 2,525 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #92 | 2,720 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #92 | 2,818 | #2,317 | 12 |
| 1928 | #90 | 2,879 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #85 | 3,158 | #2,912 | 9 |
| 1926 | #88 | 3,063 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #89 | 3,225 | #3,155 | 8 |
| 1924 | #90 | 3,150 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #90 | 3,040 | #3,822 | 6 |
| 1922 | #97 | 2,917 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #109 | 2,590 | #2,804 | 10 |
| 1920 | #114 | 2,279 | — | |
| 1919 | #130 | 1,817 | — | |
| 1918 | #126 | 1,846 | — | |
| 1917 | #166 | 1,212 | — | |
| 1916 | #176 | 1,050 | — | |
| 1915 | #198 | 828 | — | |
| 1914 | #208 | 611 | — | |
| 1913 | #227 | 449 | — | |
| 1912 | #241 | 347 | — | |
| 1911 | #241 | 266 | — | |
| 1910 | #257 | 220 | — | |
| 1909 | #249 | 202 | — | |
| 1908 | #284 | 154 | — | |
| 1907 | #280 | 156 | — | |
| 1906 | #308 | 119 | — | |
| 1905 | #304 | 122 | — | |
| 1904 | #308 | 109 | — | |
| 1903 | #335 | 87 | — | |
| 1902 | #366 | 77 | — | |
| 1901 | #374 | 63 | — | |
| 1900 | #381 | 76 | — | |
| 1899 | #351 | 72 | — | |
| 1898 | #405 | 58 | — | |
| 1897 | #356 | 67 | — | |
| 1896 | #409 | 49 | — | |
| 1895 | #393 | 51 | — | |
| 1894 | #422 | 43 | — | |
| 1893 | #399 | 45 | — | |
| 1892 | #510 | 28 | — | |
| 1891 | #404 | 37 | — | |
| 1890 | #475 | 30 | — | |
| 1889 | #516 | 24 | — | |
| 1888 | #572 | 19 | — | |
| 1887 | #537 | 17 | — | |
| 1886 | #459 | 22 | — | |
| 1885 | #608 | 13 | — | |
| 1884 | #479 | 18 | — | |
| 1883 | #561 | 12 | — | |
| 1882 | #530 | 12 | — | |
| 1881 | #503 | 11 | — | |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jeanne was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 13 girls a year got the name.
Where Jeanne is popular in 1932
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#33 · 1 in 146
- Massachusetts#45 · 1 in 142
- New Hampshire#50 · 1 in 161
- Rhode Island#51 · 1 in 154
- Connecticut#53 · 1 in 186
Best ever in a state: #23 in District of Columbia, 1927.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #33 | 26 | 1 in 146 |
| Massachusetts | #45 | 210 | 1 in 142 |
| New Hampshire | #50 | 19 | 1 in 161 |
| Rhode Island | #51 | 29 | 1 in 154 |
| Connecticut | #53 | 54 | 1 in 186 |
| Minnesota | #56 | 83 | 1 in 233 |
| New York | #62 | 314 | 1 in 281 |
| New Jersey | #66 | 94 | 1 in 283 |
| Washington | #67 | 31 | 1 in 284 |
| Vermont | #69 | 11 | 1 in 217 |
| California | #71 | 107 | 1 in 320 |
| Maine | #72 | 25 | 1 in 257 |
| Wisconsin | #73 | 76 | 1 in 303 |
| Oregon | #79 | 15 | 1 in 330 |
| Delaware | #83 | 5 | 1 in 295 |
| Illinois | #86 | 130 | 1 in 389 |
| Wyoming | #86 | 5 | 1 in 278 |
| Ohio | #88 | 112 | 1 in 408 |
| Michigan | #90 | 87 | 1 in 422 |
| Pennsylvania | #92 | 186 | 1 in 399 |
| South Dakota | #98 | 14 | 1 in 383 |
| Iowa | #99 | 37 | 1 in 480 |
| Indiana | #100 | 46 | 1 in 495 |
| Utah | #107 | 10 | 1 in 431 |
| Maryland | #113 | 22 | 1 in 552 |
| Arizona | #119 | 9 | 1 in 418 |
| Missouri | #119 | 52 | 1 in 532 |
| North Dakota | #119 | 12 | 1 in 478 |
| Nebraska | #120 | 18 | 1 in 566 |
| Montana | #126 | 7 | 1 in 486 |
| Idaho | #129 | 6 | 1 in 536 |
| Kansas | #146 | 18 | 1 in 733 |
| Colorado | #149 | 12 | 1 in 656 |
| Louisiana | #186 | 27 | 1 in 777 |
| Florida | #188 | 14 | 1 in 876 |
| Oklahoma | #191 | 23 | 1 in 955 |
| Virginia | #203 | 19 | 1 in 1,291 |
| West Virginia | #203 | 15 | 1 in 1,170 |
| Arkansas | #206 | 19 | 1 in 987 |
| Kentucky | #268 | 14 | 1 in 1,952 |
| North Carolina | #268 | 19 | 1 in 1,931 |
| Texas | #271 | 41 | 1 in 1,372 |
| Alabama | #287 | 15 | 1 in 1,993 |
| Georgia | #297 | 13 | 1 in 2,364 |
| Mississippi | #314 | 10 | 1 in 2,202 |
| South Carolina | #333 | 7 | 1 in 2,979 |
| Tennessee | #350 | 8 | 1 in 3,393 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jeanne
- 252 spots since 2024 (#4,294 → #4,546)
- 870 spots since 2020 (#3,676 → #4,546)
- 779 spots since 2015 (#3,767 → #4,546)
- Biggest jump: 149 spots in 1886 (#608 → #459)
- Biggest drop: 129 spots in 1885 (#479 → #608)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1946 at #83 (4,045 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 20 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 19 yrs · run 1922–1931
- Top 1,000: 111 yrs · run 1880–1990
- Highest: 1 in 377 girls born in 1925 were named Jeanne (0.26%)
- Latest: 1 in 53,576 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #83 in 1946, was only 1 in 388 (0.26%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 23.1% of all girls named Jeanne (37,671) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 160 | #459 (1886) | #526 |
| 1890s | 480 | #351 (1899) | #412 |
| 1900s | 1,165 | #249 (1909) | #319 |
| 1910s | 8,646 | #126 (1918) | #197 |
| 1920s | 29,119 | #85 (1927) | #94 |
| 1930s | 18,758 | #92 (1930) | #128 |
| 1940s | 30,117 | #83 (1946) | #105 |
| 1950s | 37,671 | #95 (1950) | #110 |
| 1960s | 23,540 | #129 (1960) | #168 |
| 1970s | 8,200 | #204 (1970) | #325 |
| 1980s | 3,043 | #486 (1981) | #657 |
| 1990s | 1,175 | #962 (1990) | #1,487 |
| 2000s | 567 | #2,122 (2000) | #2,938 |
| 2010s | 393 | #3,346 (2018) | #3,851 |
| 2020s | 215 | #3,676 (2020) | #4,072 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jeanne in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 501 of them was named Jeanne, which outranked 97.8% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 149,165 of them was named Jeanne, which outranked 27.8% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,849Worthy8
- #2,849Zigmund8
- #2,849Zoltan8
- #3,092Jeanne7
- #3,092Abbie7
- #3,092Abie7
- #3,092Addie7
- #3,361Able6
- #3,361Acencion6
- #3,361Achille6
Tied with 268 names at #3,092; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.