Jere

Last seen for girls in 2004 at #16,099 · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #12,330
Given to boys 78.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1941 · 137 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
4,278
since 1881

Jere over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201952peak #1,413, 1947peak #498, 1941girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022—#12,3305
2021——
2020—#12,0225
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016—#10,7446
2015——
2014——
2013—#9,6557
2012——
2011——
2010—#12,2315
2009——
2008—#9,8717
2007—#12,3675
2006—#12,0555
2005—#8,2998
2004#16,0995#11,3565
2003—#8,6437
2002—#7,6438
2001—#6,01311
2000—#10,3495
1999——
1998#11,1387#5,15912
1997#12,0706#7,2817
1996—#4,61313
1995#13,3865#6,9927
1994#11,7786#5,45210
1993—#4,69712
1992—#6,6707
1991#11,5096#4,23113
1990#8,5019#6,4157
1989#7,44910#4,27112
1988#11,7985#3,20316
1987#7,3539#4,23910
1986#6,61210#3,00516
1985#8,3187#3,07015
1984#4,16618#2,70617
1983#2,65933#2,67617
1982#1,70366#2,34121
1981#9,1106#2,56918
1980#7,4188#2,61718
1979#10,2105#2,56818
1978#8,5626#2,92914
1977—#2,66516
1976#6,6118#2,70915
1975#7,9846#2,20520
1974#5,7769#1,65929
1973—#1,92822
1972—#1,60329
1971#4,81011#1,66828
1970#7,0706#1,26043
1969#4,41811#1,25240
1968#4,00012#1,14743
1967#3,84512#94858
1966#2,83919#1,21638
1965#4,4949#1,08147
1964#3,87912#98060
1963#4,01911#89969
1962#4,01111#97361
1961#2,47424#84283
1960#2,82019#95163
1959#4,03110#85479
1958#2,20926#87774
1957#2,21825#88972
1956#1,69339#78589
1955#1,53744#728100
1954#2,07626#78883
1953#2,17323#80579
1952#1,93427#72993
1951#2,18221#672108
1950#1,95524#664110
1949#2,01323#75483
1948#1,82027#72286
1947#1,41343#624120
1946#1,77126#66395
1945#1,74323#78262
1944#1,60926#614100
1943#1,70325#594113
1942#1,91720#598110
1941#1,44629#498137
1940#1,47727#560112
1939#1,47426#59495
1938#1,80519#527122
1937#1,99916#60991
1936#1,69120#69073
1935#2,30513#566104
1934#2,18714#61194
1933#1,65821#68575
1932#1,95717#65786
1931#2,9729#80061
1930#2,30614#87357
1929#2,43713#92353
1928#3,1649#99248
1927#4,2866#1,24834
1926#3,2699#2,07415
1925—#1,53424
1924—#1,62823
1923#4,3766#1,64422
1922—#1,43427
1921—#1,98017
1920—#2,05216
1919#4,2516#1,62421
1918—#2,07315
1917—#2,42311
1916—#2,38911
1915—#2,18412
1914—#2,2719
1913——
1912—#2,2696
1911—#1,5376
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892—#8617
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881—#8665
1880——
First appearance
1881

The first year at least five boys were named Jere! It came in at #866, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1881–1891, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Jere is popular in 1952

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedNHWashington: #340 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 5,985 boysWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedMINew York: #597 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 20,598 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #289 for boys · 20 births · 1 in 5,891 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #808 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 28,064 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedARTennessee: #345 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,924 boysTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Jere, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Pennsylvania#289 · 1 in 5,891
  2. Washington#340 · 1 in 5,985
  3. Tennessee#345 · 1 in 4,924
  4. New York#597 · 1 in 20,598
  5. California#808 · 1 in 28,064

Best ever in a state: #172 in Maine, 1942.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Pennsylvania#289201 in 5,891
Washington#34051 in 5,985
Tennessee#34581 in 4,924
New York#59781 in 20,598
California#80851 in 28,064
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Jere
Momentum · boys
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 2022
  • Biggest jump: 268 spots in 1967 (#1,216 → #948)
  • Biggest drop: 199 spots in 1968 (#948 → #1,147)
Rise & fade · boys
60 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1881
  • Peaked 1941 at #498 (137 births)
  • Births halved by 1945, 4 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 40 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 40 yrs · run 1928–1964
Share of babies · boys
1 in 8,966
  • Highest: 1 in 8,966 boys born in 1941 were named Jere (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 349,202 boys born in 2022 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1940s
  • 23.8% of all boys named Jere (1,018) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2005
  • Mostly girls until 2004, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s5#866 (1881)#866
1890s7#861 (1892)#861
1900s0——
1910s91#1,537 (1911)#2,096
1920s279#923 (1929)#1,551
1930s858#527 (1938)#661
1940s1,018#498 (1941)#641
1950s887#664 (1950)#779
1960s562#842 (1961)#1,029
1970s234#1,260 (1970)#2,119
1980s160#2,341 (1982)#3,070
1990s88#4,231 (1991)#5,723
2000s61#6,013 (2001)#9,622
2010s18#9,655 (2013)#10,877
2020s10#12,022 (2020)#12,176

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Jere in 1952

girls
#1,934
27 births · 1 in 68,679 girls
boys
#729
93 births · 1 in 20,899 boys

Top girls' names in 1952

  1. #1Linda67,082
  2. #2Mary65,629
  3. #3Patricia53,101
  4. #4Deborah49,811
  5. #5Susan41,348
  6. #6Barbara39,864
  7. #7Nancy31,739
  8. #8Karen28,956
  9. #9Debra26,832
  10. #10Sandra26,097
  11. #1,934Jere27

Top boys' names in 1952

  1. #1James87,065
  2. #2Robert86,588
  3. #3John83,140
  4. #4Michael79,037
  5. #5David71,752
  6. #6William63,039
  7. #7Richard58,350
  8. #8Thomas48,647
  9. #9Charles38,866
  10. #10Gary38,754
  11. #729Jere93
More about 1952

girls

1,854,335 girls got a published name in 1952; 1 in 68,679 of them was named Jere, which outranked 69.7% of the 6,389 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jere
  1. #1,892Vina28
  2. #1,892Vivienne28
  3. #1,892Wilhelmenia28
  4. #1,934Jere27
  5. #1,934Adelia27
  6. #1,934Arletha27
  7. #1,934Arnette27
  8. #1,978Adriane26
  9. #1,978Alethia26
  10. #1,978Audry26

Tied with 43 names at #1,934; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1951
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,501Pandora#3,284 → #783
  2. ↑ 368Lise#1,314 → #946
  3. ↑ 353Vanessa#656 → #303
  4. ↑ 334Dorinda#1,170 → #836
  5. ↑ 332Mitzi#928 → #596
Fallers
  1. ↓ 380Rhona#988 → #1,368
  2. ↓ 342Sharleen#765 → #1,107
  3. ↓ 270Enid#908 → #1,178
  4. ↓ 237Allyn#988 → #1,225
  5. ↓ 230Sheron#908 → #1,138

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,943,633 boys got a published name in 1952; 1 in 20,899 of them was named Jere, which outranked 82.9% of the 4,257 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jere
  1. #726Deborah94
  2. #726Humberto94
  3. #726Lawerence94
  4. #729Jere93
  5. #729Graham93
  6. #729King93
  7. #729Rod93
  8. #733Artis92
  9. #733Huey92
  10. #733Kimberly92

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1951
Risers
  1. ↑ 753Darren#1,598 → #845
  2. ↑ 372Robby#1,242 → #870
  3. ↑ 355Cris#1,218 → #863
  4. ↑ 301Ethan#1,295 → #994
  5. ↑ 280Adan#1,150 → #870
Fallers
  1. ↓ 477Ottis#984 → #1,461
  2. ↓ 408Wayland#915 → #1,323
  3. ↓ 330Mcarthur#806 → #1,136
  4. ↓ 305Arvin#963 → #1,268
  5. ↓ 285Levon#881 → #1,166

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1952 →