Jeremiah
- #10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births
- #88 for boys in 2025, 3,840 births
- Given to boys 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2011 · 7,630 births
- Debut · boys
- 37 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 33 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 225,674since 1880
Jeremiah over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | #88 | 3,840 |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | #93 | 3,735 |
| 2023 | — | #92 | 3,771 | |
| 2022 | #12,243 | 7 | #93 | 3,886 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #82 | 4,257 |
| 2020 | — | #74 | 4,602 | |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | #69 | 5,080 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | #64 | 5,632 |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | #63 | 5,887 |
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 | #58 | 6,629 |
| 2015 | #10,866 | 9 | #54 | 6,827 |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 | #56 | 6,899 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #58 | 6,993 |
| 2012 | #6,872 | 18 | #52 | 7,498 |
| 2011 | #7,436 | 16 | #49 | 7,630 |
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | #51 | 7,743 |
| 2009 | #7,679 | 16 | #65 | 7,235 |
| 2008 | #8,529 | 14 | #68 | 6,594 |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #67 | 6,630 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #71 | 6,544 |
| 2005 | #8,330 | 13 | #78 | 5,847 |
| 2004 | #3,898 | 36 | #77 | 5,381 |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | #90 | 4,855 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #86 | 4,720 |
| 2001 | #7,724 | 13 | #90 | 4,223 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #102 | 3,643 |
| 1999 | #8,223 | 11 | #108 | 3,304 |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | #114 | 3,223 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #128 | 2,930 |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | #164 | 2,103 |
| 1995 | #7,514 | 11 | #163 | 2,054 |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | #158 | 2,081 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #166 | 1,911 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #161 | 1,938 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #156 | 2,096 |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #154 | 2,008 |
| 1989 | — | #144 | 2,147 | |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | #136 | 2,190 |
| 1987 | #4,857 | 16 | #130 | 2,137 |
| 1986 | #4,964 | 15 | #118 | 2,381 |
| 1985 | #4,282 | 18 | #111 | 2,533 |
| 1984 | #3,726 | 21 | #102 | 2,776 |
| 1983 | #2,975 | 28 | #99 | 2,849 |
| 1982 | #3,093 | 28 | #89 | 3,329 |
| 1981 | #2,847 | 31 | #77 | 3,896 |
| 1980 | #2,866 | 31 | #76 | 4,093 |
| 1979 | #2,997 | 28 | #81 | 3,719 |
| 1978 | #3,098 | 25 | #81 | 3,445 |
| 1977 | #2,463 | 35 | #69 | 4,151 |
| 1976 | #4,614 | 13 | #93 | 2,872 |
| 1975 | #4,141 | 15 | #149 | 1,651 |
| 1974 | #5,011 | 11 | #178 | 1,294 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #256 | 765 |
| 1972 | — | #431 | 341 | |
| 1971 | — | #452 | 322 | |
| 1970 | — | #552 | 217 | |
| 1969 | — | #623 | 159 | |
| 1968 | — | #660 | 130 | |
| 1967 | — | #666 | 126 | |
| 1966 | — | #649 | 130 | |
| 1965 | — | #740 | 100 | |
| 1964 | — | #703 | 121 | |
| 1963 | — | #661 | 139 | |
| 1962 | — | #685 | 128 | |
| 1961 | — | #680 | 128 | |
| 1960 | — | #634 | 151 | |
| 1959 | — | #627 | 152 | |
| 1958 | — | #625 | 151 | |
| 1957 | — | #565 | 186 | |
| 1956 | — | #596 | 163 | |
| 1955 | — | #572 | 168 | |
| 1954 | — | #560 | 170 | |
| 1953 | — | #607 | 143 | |
| 1952 | — | #537 | 173 | |
| 1951 | — | #555 | 151 | |
| 1950 | — | #521 | 164 | |
| 1949 | — | #524 | 162 | |
| 1948 | — | #563 | 140 | |
| 1947 | — | #597 | 130 | |
| 1946 | — | #589 | 119 | |
| 1945 | — | #552 | 118 | |
| 1944 | — | #614 | 100 | |
| 1943 | — | #576 | 121 | |
| 1942 | — | #536 | 130 | |
| 1941 | — | #535 | 121 | |
| 1940 | — | #539 | 119 | |
| 1939 | — | #560 | 104 | |
| 1938 | — | #551 | 110 | |
| 1937 | — | #556 | 109 | |
| 1936 | — | #549 | 108 | |
| 1935 | — | #547 | 111 | |
| 1934 | — | #526 | 123 | |
| 1933 | — | #540 | 111 | |
| 1932 | — | #532 | 121 | |
| 1931 | — | #546 | 115 | |
| 1930 | — | #529 | 127 | |
| 1929 | — | #553 | 114 | |
| 1928 | — | #584 | 112 | |
| 1927 | — | #522 | 137 | |
| 1926 | — | #573 | 115 | |
| 1925 | — | #543 | 128 | |
| 1924 | — | #568 | 125 | |
| 1923 | — | #556 | 124 | |
| 1922 | — | #559 | 128 | |
| 1921 | — | #549 | 129 | |
| 1920 | — | #539 | 129 | |
| 1919 | — | #543 | 121 | |
| 1918 | — | #596 | 105 | |
| 1917 | — | #581 | 104 | |
| 1916 | — | #547 | 109 | |
| 1915 | — | #667 | 76 | |
| 1914 | — | #539 | 83 | |
| 1913 | — | #487 | 79 | |
| 1912 | — | #521 | 57 | |
| 1911 | — | #481 | 37 | |
| 1910 | — | #461 | 35 | |
| 1909 | — | #519 | 25 | |
| 1908 | — | #522 | 23 | |
| 1907 | — | #495 | 22 | |
| 1906 | — | #472 | 22 | |
| 1905 | — | #410 | 27 | |
| 1904 | — | #340 | 35 | |
| 1903 | — | #401 | 24 | |
| 1902 | — | #360 | 30 | |
| 1901 | — | #407 | 21 | |
| 1900 | — | #325 | 43 | |
| 1899 | — | #376 | 24 | |
| 1898 | — | #350 | 30 | |
| 1897 | — | #331 | 31 | |
| 1896 | — | #279 | 43 | |
| 1895 | — | #347 | 28 | |
| 1894 | — | #336 | 28 | |
| 1893 | — | #323 | 29 | |
| 1892 | — | #320 | 33 | |
| 1891 | — | #291 | 32 | |
| 1890 | — | #290 | 35 | |
| 1889 | — | #251 | 42 | |
| 1888 | — | #308 | 34 | |
| 1887 | — | #261 | 38 | |
| 1886 | — | #267 | 40 | |
| 1885 | — | #263 | 40 | |
| 1884 | — | #278 | 38 | |
| 1883 | — | #273 | 37 | |
| 1882 | — | #298 | 33 | |
| 1881 | — | #270 | 34 | |
| 1880 | — | #276 | 37 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jeremiah was already there! It came in at #276, and was given to 37 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1903, when fewer than 31 boys a year got the name.
Where Jeremiah is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Hawaii#28 · 1 in 133
- New Mexico#44 · 1 in 203
- Alaska#56 · 1 in 189
- Mississippi#59 · 1 in 293
- Florida#66 · 1 in 314
Best ever in a state: #10 in New Mexico, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #28 | 22 | 1 in 133 |
| New Mexico | #44 | 32 | 1 in 203 |
| Alaska | #56 | 12 | 1 in 189 |
| Mississippi | #59 | 37 | 1 in 293 |
| Florida | #66 | 304 | 1 in 314 |
| Delaware | #68 | 14 | 1 in 211 |
| Louisiana | #70 | 62 | 1 in 309 |
| Nevada | #70 | 42 | 1 in 269 |
| South Carolina | #70 | 70 | 1 in 303 |
| Texas | #70 | 548 | 1 in 319 |
| Georgia | #72 | 147 | 1 in 342 |
| North Carolina | #78 | 149 | 1 in 345 |
| Washington | #78 | 94 | 1 in 349 |
| Connecticut | #80 | 45 | 1 in 293 |
| California | #84 | 449 | 1 in 391 |
| Maryland | #86 | 62 | 1 in 369 |
| Virginia | #86 | 99 | 1 in 376 |
| New Jersey | #88 | 108 | 1 in 368 |
| Alabama | #89 | 57 | 1 in 378 |
| Oklahoma | #89 | 47 | 1 in 376 |
| Wyoming | #89 | 5 | 1 in 218 |
| Pennsylvania | #90 | 138 | 1 in 379 |
| New York | #93 | 189 | 1 in 447 |
| Arizona | #96 | 86 | 1 in 381 |
| Indiana | #96 | 78 | 1 in 406 |
| Ohio | #96 | 130 | 1 in 404 |
| District of Columbia | #97 | 9 | 1 in 281 |
| Rhode Island | #97 | 11 | 1 in 284 |
| Iowa | #99 | 37 | 1 in 374 |
| Michigan | #102 | 91 | 1 in 442 |
| Kentucky | #105 | 51 | 1 in 403 |
| South Dakota | #105 | 12 | 1 in 320 |
| Montana | #109 | 11 | 1 in 342 |
| Colorado | #110 | 63 | 1 in 426 |
| Tennessee | #113 | 82 | 1 in 448 |
| Massachusetts | #119 | 60 | 1 in 450 |
| North Dakota | #120 | 10 | 1 in 336 |
| Nebraska | #122 | 21 | 1 in 420 |
| Illinois | #124 | 92 | 1 in 539 |
| Missouri | #124 | 57 | 1 in 488 |
| West Virginia | #127 | 15 | 1 in 411 |
| Arkansas | #151 | 24 | 1 in 524 |
| Kansas | #160 | 24 | 1 in 585 |
| Oregon | #170 | 24 | 1 in 627 |
| Minnesota | #178 | 37 | 1 in 662 |
| New Hampshire | #188 | 7 | 1 in 643 |
| Wisconsin | #192 | 32 | 1 in 732 |
| Utah | #198 | 27 | 1 in 728 |
| Idaho | #214 | 12 | 1 in 719 |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jeremiah
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 5 spots since 2024 (#93 → #88)
- 14 spots since 2020 (#74 → #88)
- Biggest jump: 175 spots in 1973
- Biggest drop: 128 spots in 1915
Rise & fade · boys
131 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2011 at #49 (7,630 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 33 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 33 yrs · run 2001–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 248
- Highest: 1 in 248 boys born in 2010 were named Jeremiah (0.40%)
- Latest: 1 in 445 boys born in 2025 (0.22%)
- Its best rank, #49 in 2011, was only 1 in 249 (0.40%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 29.6% of all boys named Jeremiah (66,818) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 373 | #251 (1889) | #275 |
| 1890s | 313 | #279 (1896) | #324 |
| 1900s | 272 | #325 (1900) | #425 |
| 1910s | 806 | #461 (1910) | #542 |
| 1920s | 1,241 | #522 (1927) | #555 |
| 1930s | 1,139 | #526 (1934) | #544 |
| 1940s | 1,260 | #524 (1949) | #563 |
| 1950s | 1,621 | #521 (1950) | #577 |
| 1960s | 1,312 | #623 (1969) | #670 |
| 1970s | 18,777 | #69 (1977) | #234 |
| 1980s | 28,331 | #76 (1980) | #108 |
| 1990s | 23,648 | #108 (1999) | #147 |
| 2000s | 55,672 | #65 (2009) | #79 |
| 2010s | 66,818 | #49 (2011) | #57 |
| 2020s | 24,091 | #74 (2020) | #87 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jeremiah ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: