Jessiah
- #11,932 for girls in 2025, 7 births
- #1,808 for boys in 2025, 88 births
- Given to boys 86.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2020 · 144 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,285since 1978
Jessiah over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #11,932 | 7 | #1,808 | 88 |
| 2024 | #9,556 | 10 | #1,641 | 103 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #1,727 | 96 |
| 2022 | #8,542 | 12 | #1,414 | 130 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #1,307 | 143 |
| 2020 | #5,850 | 20 | #1,271 | 144 |
| 2019 | #6,698 | 17 | #1,479 | 116 |
| 2018 | #7,409 | 15 | #1,317 | 138 |
| 2017 | #6,808 | 17 | #1,348 | 132 |
| 2016 | #4,990 | 27 | #1,641 | 97 |
| 2015 | #4,981 | 27 | #1,444 | 117 |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 | #1,536 | 104 |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | #1,588 | 97 |
| 2012 | #8,632 | 13 | #1,863 | 78 |
| 2011 | #8,614 | 13 | #2,232 | 58 |
| 2010 | #7,513 | 16 | #2,118 | 63 |
| 2009 | #9,379 | 12 | #1,774 | 85 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | #2,237 | 59 |
| 2007 | #6,323 | 21 | #2,139 | 63 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #2,932 | 38 |
| 2005 | #8,330 | 13 | #2,297 | 51 |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | #2,599 | 41 |
| 2003 | #9,048 | 11 | #2,674 | 37 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #2,943 | 31 |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #4,121 | 19 |
| 2000 | #9,874 | 9 | #3,764 | 21 |
| 1999 | — | #4,341 | 16 | |
| 1998 | — | #4,650 | 14 | |
| 1997 | — | #4,451 | 14 | |
| 1996 | — | #5,187 | 11 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | #4,537 | 13 | |
| 1993 | — | #4,227 | 14 | |
| 1992 | — | #5,660 | 9 | |
| 1991 | — | #7,271 | 6 | |
| 1990 | — | #8,117 | 5 | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | #5,561 | 6 | |
| 1983 | — | #3,884 | 10 | |
| 1982 | — | #6,385 | 5 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,961 | 7 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | #5,059 | 6 | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1978
The first year at least five boys were named Jessiah! It came in at #5,059, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1979–1980, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jessiah is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Jersey#1,022 · 1 in 7,953
- Florida#1,256 · 1 in 10,615
- Illinois#1,280 · 1 in 9,910
- Texas#1,347 · 1 in 12,504
- California#1,829 · 1 in 21,934
Best ever in a state: #528 in Alabama, 2018.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #1,022 | 5 | 1 in 7,953 |
| Florida | #1,256 | 9 | 1 in 10,615 |
| Illinois | #1,280 | 5 | 1 in 9,910 |
| Texas | #1,347 | 14 | 1 in 12,504 |
| California | #1,829 | 8 | 1 in 21,934 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jessiah
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 537 spots since 2020 (#1,271 → #1,808)
Rise & fade · boys
42 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1978
- Peaked 2020 at #1,271 (144 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 11,987
- Highest: 1 in 11,987 boys born in 2020 were named Jessiah (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,410 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 43.8% of all boys named Jessiah (1,000) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6 | #5,059 (1978) | #5,059 |
| 1980s | 28 | #3,884 (1983) | #5,198 |
| 1990s | 102 | #4,227 (1993) | #5,382 |
| 2000s | 445 | #1,774 (2009) | #2,748 |
| 2010s | 1,000 | #1,317 (2018) | #1,657 |
| 2020s | 704 | #1,271 (2020) | #1,528 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jessiah ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: