Jett
- #3,975 for girls in 2025, 36 births
- #169 for boys in 2025, 2,167 births
- Given to boys 97.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2024 · 2,227 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 26,465since 1892
Jett over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Jett has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it. Not on the chart: 5 boys in 1892 (see the data table).
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,975 | 36 | #169 | 2,167 |
| 2024 | #3,892 | 38 | #161 | 2,227 |
| 2023 | #3,709 | 41 | #206 | 1,787 |
| 2022 | #3,827 | 39 | #211 | 1,776 |
| 2021 | #3,435 | 45 | #246 | 1,451 |
| 2020 | #4,648 | 28 | #278 | 1,213 |
| 2019 | #4,653 | 29 | #286 | 1,203 |
| 2018 | #4,562 | 30 | #304 | 1,134 |
| 2017 | #4,695 | 29 | #301 | 1,172 |
| 2016 | #4,423 | 32 | #314 | 1,117 |
| 2015 | #3,533 | 44 | #329 | 1,049 |
| 2014 | #4,768 | 29 | #332 | 1,023 |
| 2013 | #4,887 | 28 | #325 | 1,017 |
| 2012 | #4,957 | 28 | #345 | 891 |
| 2011 | #9,150 | 12 | #331 | 927 |
| 2010 | #7,880 | 15 | #352 | 872 |
| 2009 | #7,341 | 17 | #387 | 783 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | #534 | 499 |
| 2007 | #9,539 | 12 | #536 | 479 |
| 2006 | #6,125 | 21 | #536 | 471 |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | #506 | 486 |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | #603 | 354 |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | #620 | 334 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #603 | 335 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | #643 | 290 |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | #643 | 282 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #796 | 193 |
| 1998 | — | #1,068 | 123 | |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #1,182 | 101 |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | #1,278 | 86 |
| 1995 | — | #1,603 | 57 | |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | #1,977 | 42 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #1,699 | 51 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #2,834 | 24 |
| 1991 | — | #2,544 | 27 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,952 | 21 | |
| 1989 | — | #2,359 | 28 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,509 | 23 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,468 | 22 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,684 | 19 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,226 | 24 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,706 | 17 | |
| 1983 | — | #3,071 | 14 | |
| 1982 | — | #3,692 | 11 | |
| 1981 | — | #6,262 | 5 | |
| 1980 | — | #4,940 | 7 | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | #3,400 | 11 | |
| 1977 | — | #5,123 | 6 | |
| 1976 | — | #4,418 | 7 | |
| 1975 | — | #4,797 | 6 | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | #4,441 | 6 | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #2,854 | 9 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,414 | 12 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,117 | 15 | |
| 1961 | — | #2,900 | 9 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,315 | 13 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,033 | 16 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,026 | 16 | |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #1,634 | 24 |
| 1956 | — | #2,168 | 14 | |
| 1955 | — | #3,886 | 5 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,143 | 7 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | #3,690 | 5 | |
| 1948 | — | #3,668 | 5 | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | #3,480 | 5 | |
| 1938 | — | #3,175 | 6 | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | #4,151 | 5 | |
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | #3,177 | 7 | |
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | #2,915 | 6 | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #1,066 | 5 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1892
The first year at least five boys were named Jett! It came in at #1,066, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1892–1913, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jett is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- North Dakota#30 · 1 in 146
- Utah#53 · 1 in 246
- Nebraska#56 · 1 in 232
- Wyoming#72 · 1 in 182
- Idaho#76 · 1 in 298
Best ever in a state: #30 in North Dakota, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #30 | 23 | 1 in 146 |
| Utah | #53 | 80 | 1 in 246 |
| Nebraska | #56 | 38 | 1 in 232 |
| Wyoming | #72 | 6 | 1 in 182 |
| Idaho | #76 | 29 | 1 in 298 |
| Kansas | #82 | 40 | 1 in 351 |
| South Dakota | #94 | 13 | 1 in 296 |
| Montana | #96 | 12 | 1 in 314 |
| Louisiana | #97 | 50 | 1 in 383 |
| Iowa | #99 | 37 | 1 in 374 |
| Michigan | #105 | 89 | 1 in 452 |
| Oklahoma | #112 | 42 | 1 in 421 |
| Alabama | #116 | 45 | 1 in 478 |
| Missouri | #124 | 57 | 1 in 488 |
| Rhode Island | #125 | 9 | 1 in 347 |
| Oregon | #128 | 32 | 1 in 471 |
| Wisconsin | #130 | 47 | 1 in 499 |
| Minnesota | #132 | 49 | 1 in 500 |
| Arizona | #135 | 65 | 1 in 503 |
| Maine | #139 | 9 | 1 in 427 |
| Nevada | #140 | 22 | 1 in 513 |
| Delaware | #142 | 7 | 1 in 421 |
| Kentucky | #144 | 38 | 1 in 540 |
| Mississippi | #144 | 22 | 1 in 493 |
| Hawaii | #146 | 7 | 1 in 417 |
| Pennsylvania | #156 | 83 | 1 in 630 |
| New Mexico | #161 | 12 | 1 in 542 |
| Texas | #168 | 221 | 1 in 792 |
| Indiana | #169 | 50 | 1 in 633 |
| South Carolina | #178 | 31 | 1 in 684 |
| Arkansas | #181 | 20 | 1 in 629 |
| Florida | #183 | 121 | 1 in 790 |
| North Carolina | #184 | 68 | 1 in 757 |
| Ohio | #185 | 70 | 1 in 750 |
| Washington | #185 | 47 | 1 in 698 |
| Connecticut | #187 | 18 | 1 in 734 |
| New Hampshire | #188 | 7 | 1 in 643 |
| Georgia | #194 | 63 | 1 in 797 |
| Tennessee | #194 | 47 | 1 in 782 |
| Maryland | #196 | 30 | 1 in 763 |
| California | #197 | 187 | 1 in 938 |
| Colorado | #199 | 34 | 1 in 790 |
| Virginia | #222 | 40 | 1 in 931 |
| West Virginia | #227 | 8 | 1 in 770 |
| New Jersey | #272 | 33 | 1 in 1,205 |
| Illinois | #297 | 36 | 1 in 1,376 |
| Massachusetts | #318 | 17 | 1 in 1,589 |
| New York | #359 | 49 | 1 in 1,723 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jett
Momentum · boys
Rising
- 8 spots since 2024 (#161 → #169)
- 109 spots since 2020 (#278 → #169)
- Biggest jump: 272 spots in 1999
- Biggest drop: 30 spots in 2006
Rise & fade · boys
132 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1892
- Peaked 2024 at #161 (2,227 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 27 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1999–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 774
- Highest: 1 in 774 boys born in 2024 were named Jett (0.13%)
- Latest: 1 in 788 boys born in 2025 (0.13%)
Era · boys
The 2020s
- 40.1% of all boys named Jett (10,621) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,066 (1892) | #1,066 |
| 1900s | 0 | — | — |
| 1910s | 13 | #2,915 (1914) | #3,046 |
| 1920s | 5 | #4,151 (1928) | #4,151 |
| 1930s | 11 | #3,175 (1938) | #3,328 |
| 1940s | 15 | #3,459 (1940) | #3,606 |
| 1950s | 82 | #1,634 (1957) | #2,482 |
| 1960s | 64 | #2,117 (1962) | #2,693 |
| 1970s | 36 | #3,400 (1978) | #4,436 |
| 1980s | 170 | #2,226 (1985) | #3,292 |
| 1990s | 725 | #796 (1999) | #1,793 |
| 2000s | 4,313 | #387 (2009) | #561 |
| 2010s | 10,405 | #286 (2019) | #322 |
| 2020s | 10,621 | #161 (2024) | #212 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jett ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: