Joanna

#306 for girls in 2025, 997 births · Last seen for boys in 2014 at #12,108
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1984 · 3,332 births
Debut · girls
26 births
In top 100 · girls
2 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
111,761
since 1880

Joanna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202017peak #88, 1984girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#306997—
2024#329945—
2023#339918—
2022#3211,002—
2021#2901,101—
2020#2561,176—
2019#2541,281—
2018#2131,454—
2017#2341,352—
2016#2471,274—
2015#3051,065—
2014#3241,022#12,1085
2013#342945—
2012#323974—
2011#323976—
2010#3051,066—
2009#3011,106#12,4915
2008#2831,194—
2007#2521,392—
2006#2561,289—
2005#2841,167—
2004#2511,280#8,1438
2003#2511,303#9,5816
2002#2391,335—
2001#2061,555#10,5565
2000#2381,349—
1999#2371,327#7,8747
1998#2401,281—
1997#2081,409—
1996#2091,405—
1995#1851,597#6,4078
1994#1831,624#6,9687
1993#1771,638#5,00211
1992#1671,825#4,11414
1991#1521,951#4,76011
1990#1382,230#4,67311
1989#1422,116#3,44616
1988#1312,206#3,35015
1987#1332,056#2,64120
1986#1262,227#2,60120
1985#992,772#2,29323
1984#883,332#2,36421
1983#1392,120#4,9077
1982#1611,834#3,10814
1981#1541,828#3,85810
1980#1631,725#4,4958
1979#1931,388#3,81010
1978#1901,349#4,5547
1977#1731,565—
1976#1521,718#4,4187
1975#1581,699#4,7976
1974#1551,772#4,1907
1973#1661,664—
1972#1981,423—
1971#2221,372—
1970#2361,331#4,7245
1969#2441,217#4,4045
1968#2611,036—
1967#292859#3,2317
1966#284890—
1965#293910—
1964#315877—
1963#313888—
1962#324834—
1961#321865—
1960#329820—
1959#348755—
1958#358665—
1957#375582—
1956#413482—
1955#414455—
1954#400471—
1953#430411—
1952#423407—
1951#388445—
1950#362478—
1949#366463—
1948#342515—
1947#356509—
1946#332498—
1945#333426—
1944#317453—
1943#307514—
1942#308502—
1941#321417—
1940#314412—
1939#313390—
1938#304427—
1937#297438—
1936#324361—
1935#293424—
1934#281480—
1933#327367—
1932#345337—
1931#350331—
1930#351359—
1929#401273—
1928#397285—
1927#449239—
1926#406281—
1925#452236—
1924#483208—
1923#491199—
1922#513185—
1921#566160—
1920#553167—
1919#532165—
1918#510180—
1917#507170—
1916#499168—
1915#513147—
1914#64281—
1913#52594—
1912#56373—
1911#54859—
1910#59349—
1909#55248—
1908#49354—
1907#66632—
1906#55540—
1905#53641—
1904#54537—
1903#47845—
1902#64826—
1901#54731—
1900#56737—
1899#46140—
1898#47542—
1897#41450—
1896#47837—
1895#54729—
1894#41844—
1893#43936—
1892#40942—
1891#41336—
1890#44633—
1889#47527—
1888#40337—
1887#37832—
1886#36035—
1885#32140—
1884#40924—
1883#30633—
1882#47515—
1881#36021—
1880#30926—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Joanna was already there! It came in at #309, and was given to 26 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1881–1882, when fewer than 22 girls a year got the name.

Where Joanna is popular in 2017

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedNHWashington: #219 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 941 girlsWAIdaho: #211 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 702 girlsIDMontana: #116 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 343 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #214 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 611 girlsNDMinnesota: #226 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 920 girlsMNIllinois: #203 for girls · 58 births · 1 in 958 girlsILWisconsin: #336 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,411 girlsWIMichigan: #220 for girls · 44 births · 1 in 938 girlsMINew York: #275 for girls · 68 births · 1 in 1,294 girlsNYMassachusetts: #303 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,326 girlsMARhode Island: #135 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 405 girlsRIOregon: #285 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,115 girlsORNevada: #354 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,355 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedSDIowa: #251 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 958 girlsIAIndiana: #209 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 885 girlsINOhio: #216 for girls · 55 births · 1 in 941 girlsOHPennsylvania: #236 for girls · 52 births · 1 in 983 girlsPANew Jersey: #284 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 1,284 girlsNJConnecticut: #456 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,962 girlsCTCalifornia: #190 for girls · 195 births · 1 in 1,004 girlsCAUtah: #411 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,705 girlsUTColorado: #314 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,331 girlsCONebraska: #186 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 655 girlsNEMissouri: #286 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 1,181 girlsMOKentucky: #189 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 777 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedWVVirginia: #185 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 838 girlsVAMaryland: #193 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 776 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedDEArizona: #316 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,307 girlsAZNew Mexico: #288 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 968 girlsNMKansas: #208 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 800 girlsKSArkansas: #425 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,605 girlsARTennessee: #274 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 1,133 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #208 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 945 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #274 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,110 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #176 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 716 girlsOKLouisiana: #532 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,209 girlsLAMississippi: #247 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 910 girlsMSAlabama: #168 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 710 girlsALGeorgia: #187 for girls · 57 births · 1 in 827 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Joanna, so not publishedHITexas: #229 for girls · 140 births · 1 in 1,142 girlsTXFlorida: #295 for girls · 62 births · 1 in 1,386 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Montana#116 · 1 in 343
  2. Rhode Island#135 · 1 in 405
  3. Alabama#168 · 1 in 710
  4. Oklahoma#176 · 1 in 716
  5. Virginia#185 · 1 in 838

Best ever in a state: #57 in New Mexico, 1984.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Montana#11681 in 343
Rhode Island#13571 in 405
Alabama#168271 in 710
Oklahoma#176221 in 716
Virginia#185431 in 838
Nebraska#186121 in 655
Georgia#187571 in 827
Kentucky#189231 in 777
California#1901951 in 1,004
Maryland#193301 in 776
Illinois#203581 in 958
Kansas#208151 in 800
North Carolina#208481 in 945
Indiana#209341 in 885
Idaho#21191 in 702
North Dakota#21451 in 611
Ohio#216551 in 941
Washington#219331 in 941
Michigan#220441 in 938
Minnesota#226261 in 920
Texas#2291401 in 1,142
Pennsylvania#236521 in 983
Mississippi#247121 in 910
Iowa#251131 in 958
South Carolina#274161 in 1,110
Tennessee#274271 in 1,133
New York#275681 in 1,294
New Jersey#284281 in 1,284
Oregon#285131 in 1,115
Missouri#286221 in 1,181
New Mexico#28861 in 968
Florida#295621 in 1,386
Massachusetts#303191 in 1,326
Colorado#314171 in 1,331
Arizona#316231 in 1,307
Wisconsin#336161 in 1,411
Nevada#35481 in 1,355
Utah#411101 in 1,705
Arkansas#42571 in 1,605
Connecticut#45661 in 1,962
Louisiana#53291 in 2,209
Alaska———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Maine———
New Hampshire———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Joanna
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 23 spots since 2024 (#329 → #306)
  • 50 spots since 2020 (#256 → #306)
  • 1 spot since 2015 (#305 → #306)
  • Biggest jump: 173 spots in 1908 (#666 → #493)
  • Biggest drop: 129 spots in 1895 (#418 → #547)
Rise & fade · girls
104 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1984 at #88 (3,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1993, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 2 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 2 yrs · run 1984–1985
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 505
  • Highest: 1 in 505 girls born in 1984 were named Joanna (0.20%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,612 girls born in 2025 (0.06%)
Era · girls
The 1980s
  • 19.9% of all girls named Joanna (22,216) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s290#306 (1883)#380
1890s389#409 (1892)#450
1900s391#478 (1903)#559
1910s1,186#499 (1916)#543
1920s2,233#397 (1928)#471
1930s3,914#281 (1934)#319
1940s4,709#307 (1943)#330
1950s5,151#348 (1959)#391
1960s9,196#244 (1969)#298
1970s15,281#152 (1976)#184
1980s22,216#88 (1984)#134
1990s16,287#138 (1990)#190
2000s12,970#206 (2001)#256
2010s11,409#213 (2018)#287
2020s6,139#256 (2020)#307

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Joanna in 2017

girls
#234
1,352 births · 1 in 1,277 girls

Top girls' names in 2017

  1. #1Emma19,873
  2. #2Olivia18,778
  3. #3Ava16,017
  4. #4Isabella15,263
  5. #5Sophia14,947
  6. #6Mia13,521
  7. #7Charlotte12,969
  8. #8Amelia11,870
  9. #9Evelyn10,748
  10. #10Abigail10,645
  11. #234Joanna1,352
More about 2017

girls

1,726,461 girls got a published name in 2017; 1 in 1,277 of them was named Joanna, which outranked 98.7% of the 18,448 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Joanna
  1. #231Dakota1,362
  2. #232Hayden1,359
  3. #233Ayla1,358
  4. #234Joanna1,352
  5. #234Angela1,352
  6. #236Rosalie1,351
  7. #237Jayla1,350
  8. #238Noelle1,347

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2016
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,443Ensley#2,412 → #969
  2. ↑ 1,020Oaklynn#1,908 → #888
  3. ↑ 842Dream#1,667 → #825
  4. ↑ 749Oaklyn#1,425 → #676
  5. ↑ 717Melania#1,649 → #932
Fallers
  1. ↓ 263Julianne#919 → #1,182
  2. ↓ 243Milania#947 → #1,190
  3. ↓ 240Wendy#858 → #1,098
  4. ↓ 238Montserrat#808 → #1,046
  5. ↓ 224Nathaly#930 → #1,154

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2017 →