Joaquin
Last seen for girls in 2008 at #17,504 · #355 for boys in 2025, 925 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2008 · 1,245 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 35,601since 1886
Joaquin over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Joaquin has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #355 | 925 | |
| 2024 | — | #340 | 1,011 | |
| 2023 | — | #335 | 999 | |
| 2022 | — | #329 | 1,029 | |
| 2021 | — | #309 | 1,083 | |
| 2020 | — | #306 | 1,083 | |
| 2019 | — | #332 | 1,006 | |
| 2018 | — | #347 | 954 | |
| 2017 | — | #364 | 906 | |
| 2016 | — | #346 | 1,003 | |
| 2015 | — | #321 | 1,082 | |
| 2014 | — | #327 | 1,045 | |
| 2013 | — | #340 | 953 | |
| 2012 | — | #326 | 970 | |
| 2011 | — | #328 | 950 | |
| 2010 | — | #309 | 1,030 | |
| 2009 | — | #295 | 1,117 | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #275 | 1,245 |
| 2007 | — | #290 | 1,180 | |
| 2006 | — | #285 | 1,225 | |
| 2005 | — | #350 | 847 | |
| 2004 | — | #385 | 711 | |
| 2003 | — | #451 | 559 | |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #495 | 467 |
| 2001 | — | #501 | 454 | |
| 2000 | — | #563 | 367 | |
| 1999 | — | #540 | 377 | |
| 1998 | — | #555 | 354 | |
| 1997 | — | #584 | 312 | |
| 1996 | — | #589 | 305 | |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #581 | 311 |
| 1994 | — | #602 | 298 | |
| 1993 | — | #593 | 299 | |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | #627 | 270 |
| 1991 | — | #639 | 256 | |
| 1990 | — | #599 | 280 | |
| 1989 | — | #605 | 263 | |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #626 | 228 |
| 1987 | — | #586 | 239 | |
| 1986 | — | #597 | 222 | |
| 1985 | — | #550 | 255 | |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #550 | 247 |
| 1983 | — | #550 | 232 | |
| 1982 | — | #546 | 248 | |
| 1981 | — | #578 | 219 | |
| 1980 | — | #520 | 270 | |
| 1979 | — | #529 | 258 | |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #569 | 217 |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #587 | 206 |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #508 | 248 |
| 1975 | — | #506 | 250 | |
| 1974 | — | #562 | 204 | |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #534 | 217 |
| 1972 | — | #580 | 188 | |
| 1971 | — | #620 | 179 | |
| 1970 | — | #635 | 163 | |
| 1969 | — | #676 | 135 | |
| 1968 | — | #707 | 114 | |
| 1967 | — | #680 | 120 | |
| 1966 | — | #730 | 102 | |
| 1965 | — | #705 | 111 | |
| 1964 | — | #711 | 118 | |
| 1963 | — | #740 | 109 | |
| 1962 | — | #793 | 92 | |
| 1961 | — | #803 | 90 | |
| 1960 | — | #788 | 94 | |
| 1959 | — | #801 | 91 | |
| 1958 | — | #761 | 95 | |
| 1957 | — | #818 | 85 | |
| 1956 | — | #796 | 87 | |
| 1955 | — | #933 | 64 | |
| 1954 | — | #908 | 66 | |
| 1953 | — | #932 | 59 | |
| 1952 | — | #763 | 85 | |
| 1951 | — | #820 | 74 | |
| 1950 | — | #819 | 69 | |
| 1949 | — | #849 | 65 | |
| 1948 | — | #910 | 57 | |
| 1947 | — | #956 | 55 | |
| 1946 | — | #967 | 48 | |
| 1945 | — | #817 | 58 | |
| 1944 | — | #878 | 52 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,053 | 41 | |
| 1942 | — | #947 | 49 | |
| 1941 | — | #876 | 52 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,050 | 38 | |
| 1939 | — | #818 | 55 | |
| 1938 | — | #912 | 48 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,000 | 40 | |
| 1936 | — | #906 | 46 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,040 | 38 | |
| 1934 | — | #888 | 50 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,013 | 40 | |
| 1932 | — | #924 | 49 | |
| 1931 | — | #887 | 52 | |
| 1930 | — | #744 | 73 | |
| 1929 | — | #869 | 58 | |
| 1928 | — | #786 | 68 | |
| 1927 | — | #822 | 66 | |
| 1926 | — | #894 | 56 | |
| 1925 | — | #890 | 57 | |
| 1924 | — | #960 | 53 | |
| 1923 | — | #905 | 57 | |
| 1922 | — | #801 | 70 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,045 | 45 | |
| 1920 | — | #896 | 59 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,024 | 44 | |
| 1918 | — | #894 | 55 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,078 | 38 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,043 | 38 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,141 | 32 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,073 | 28 | |
| 1913 | — | #969 | 26 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,353 | 13 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,537 | 6 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,118 | 9 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | #877 | 10 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,345 | 5 | |
| 1906 | — | #1,253 | 5 | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | #1,205 | 5 | |
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | #1,057 | 5 | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #845 | 6 | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1886
The first year at least five boys were named Joaquin! It came in at #845, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1887–1907, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Joaquin is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Mexico#67 · 1 in 236
- District of Columbia#159 · 1 in 531
- California#161 · 1 in 725
- Texas#165 · 1 in 714
- Arizona#222 · 1 in 929
Best ever in a state: #63 in New Mexico, 2006.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #67 | 45 | 1 in 236 |
| District of Columbia | #159 | 8 | 1 in 531 |
| California | #161 | 334 | 1 in 725 |
| Texas | #165 | 261 | 1 in 714 |
| Arizona | #222 | 43 | 1 in 929 |
| Colorado | #251 | 27 | 1 in 1,065 |
| Illinois | #284 | 45 | 1 in 1,612 |
| Florida | #295 | 55 | 1 in 1,733 |
| Virginia | #322 | 22 | 1 in 1,916 |
| Maryland | #350 | 15 | 1 in 1,917 |
| Minnesota | #351 | 15 | 1 in 1,947 |
| Washington | #361 | 20 | 1 in 1,848 |
| Kansas | #371 | 9 | 1 in 1,860 |
| Oregon | #376 | 10 | 1 in 1,932 |
| Nevada | #378 | 7 | 1 in 2,051 |
| Nebraska | #406 | 5 | 1 in 2,075 |
| New Jersey | #408 | 17 | 1 in 2,624 |
| Utah | #429 | 10 | 1 in 2,299 |
| New York | #430 | 38 | 1 in 2,835 |
| Massachusetts | #436 | 10 | 1 in 3,106 |
| Iowa | #442 | 6 | 1 in 2,637 |
| Wisconsin | #442 | 10 | 1 in 2,870 |
| Indiana | #486 | 12 | 1 in 3,116 |
| Oklahoma | #531 | 7 | 1 in 3,065 |
| Georgia | #603 | 15 | 1 in 3,935 |
| South Carolina | #659 | 5 | 1 in 4,340 |
| North Carolina | #667 | 11 | 1 in 4,894 |
| Tennessee | #752 | 6 | 1 in 6,054 |
| Michigan | #763 | 8 | 1 in 6,169 |
| Ohio | #862 | 8 | 1 in 7,832 |
| Pennsylvania | #907 | 7 | 1 in 8,875 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Joaquin
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 15 spots since 2024 (#340 → #355)
- 49 spots since 2020 (#306 → #355)
- 34 spots since 2015 (#321 → #355)
- Biggest jump: 468 spots in 1908 (#1,345 → #877)
- Biggest drop: 232 spots in 1940 (#818 → #1,050)
Rise & fade · boys
122 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1886
- Peaked 2008 at #275 (1,245 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 105 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 105 yrs · run 1944–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,594
- Highest: 1 in 1,594 boys born in 2020 were named Joaquin (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,847 boys born in 2025 (0.05%)
- Its best rank, #275 in 2008, was only 1 in 1,639 (0.06%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 27.8% of all boys named Joaquin (9,899) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | #845 (1886) | #845 |
| 1890s | 5 | #1,057 (1897) | #1,057 |
| 1900s | 30 | #877 (1908) | #1,162 |
| 1910s | 289 | #894 (1918) | #1,123 |
| 1920s | 589 | #786 (1928) | #887 |
| 1930s | 491 | #744 (1930) | #913 |
| 1940s | 515 | #817 (1945) | #930 |
| 1950s | 775 | #761 (1958) | #835 |
| 1960s | 1,085 | #676 (1969) | #733 |
| 1970s | 2,130 | #506 (1975) | #563 |
| 1980s | 2,423 | #520 (1980) | #571 |
| 1990s | 3,062 | #540 (1999) | #591 |
| 2000s | 8,172 | #275 (2008) | #389 |
| 2010s | 9,899 | #309 (2010) | #334 |
| 2020s | 6,130 | #306 (2020) | #329 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Joaquin in 2009
boys
#295
1,117 births · 1 in 1,776 boys
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 1,776 of them was named Joaquin, which outranked 98.0% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Joaquin
Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.