Jocelyn
#393 for girls in 2025, 788 births · Last seen for boys in 2016 at #10,744
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2007 · 5,293 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 12 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 113,061since 1900
Jocelyn over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #393 | 788 | — | |
| 2024 | #389 | 813 | — | |
| 2023 | #346 | 890 | — | |
| 2022 | #315 | 1,017 | — | |
| 2021 | #292 | 1,093 | — | |
| 2020 | #269 | 1,147 | — | |
| 2019 | #200 | 1,520 | — | |
| 2018 | #195 | 1,560 | — | |
| 2017 | #163 | 1,843 | — | |
| 2016 | #147 | 2,105 | #10,744 | 6 |
| 2015 | #133 | 2,453 | — | |
| 2014 | #115 | 2,764 | — | |
| 2013 | #99 | 3,152 | — | |
| 2012 | #93 | 3,232 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #71 | 3,731 | — | |
| 2010 | #65 | 3,997 | — | |
| 2009 | #71 | 4,118 | #7,692 | 10 |
| 2008 | #67 | 4,372 | #9,019 | 8 |
| 2007 | #50 | 5,293 | #7,094 | 11 |
| 2006 | #73 | 4,370 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #87 | 3,681 | #5,034 | 16 |
| 2004 | #85 | 3,743 | #5,007 | 16 |
| 2003 | #87 | 3,718 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #92 | 3,521 | #9,392 | 6 |
| 2001 | #123 | 2,827 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #122 | 2,746 | #6,316 | 10 |
| 1999 | #132 | 2,477 | #5,317 | 12 |
| 1998 | #128 | 2,583 | #5,159 | 12 |
| 1997 | #122 | 2,621 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #127 | 2,509 | #5,982 | 9 |
| 1995 | #148 | 2,193 | #4,508 | 13 |
| 1994 | #157 | 2,059 | #5,109 | 11 |
| 1993 | #162 | 1,926 | #3,042 | 22 |
| 1992 | #164 | 1,843 | #3,748 | 16 |
| 1991 | #215 | 1,355 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #217 | 1,318 | #5,823 | 8 |
| 1989 | #247 | 1,081 | #3,446 | 16 |
| 1988 | #238 | 1,104 | #3,350 | 15 |
| 1987 | #260 | 979 | #5,459 | 7 |
| 1986 | #292 | 851 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #287 | 869 | #4,052 | 10 |
| 1984 | #277 | 869 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #321 | 723 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #327 | 741 | #3,692 | 11 |
| 1981 | #299 | 809 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #317 | 761 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #324 | 721 | #3,168 | 13 |
| 1978 | #279 | 827 | #4,554 | 7 |
| 1977 | #267 | 938 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #455 | 424 | — | |
| 1975 | #468 | 400 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #461 | 389 | — | |
| 1973 | #493 | 356 | — | |
| 1972 | #501 | 351 | — | |
| 1971 | #485 | 396 | — | |
| 1970 | #484 | 413 | — | |
| 1969 | #492 | 390 | — | |
| 1968 | #529 | 324 | — | |
| 1967 | #593 | 260 | — | |
| 1966 | #550 | 297 | — | |
| 1965 | #557 | 292 | — | |
| 1964 | #624 | 262 | — | |
| 1963 | #617 | 267 | — | |
| 1962 | #691 | 222 | — | |
| 1961 | #703 | 223 | — | |
| 1960 | #673 | 228 | — | |
| 1959 | #641 | 241 | — | |
| 1958 | #559 | 306 | — | |
| 1957 | #507 | 353 | — | |
| 1956 | #458 | 404 | — | |
| 1955 | #463 | 383 | — | |
| 1954 | #508 | 304 | — | |
| 1953 | #497 | 308 | — | |
| 1952 | #534 | 255 | — | |
| 1951 | #493 | 276 | — | |
| 1950 | #738 | 136 | — | |
| 1949 | #895 | 97 | — | |
| 1948 | #977 | 79 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,047 | 72 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,006 | 70 | — | |
| 1945 | #889 | 72 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,140 | 47 | — | |
| 1943 | #907 | 73 | — | |
| 1942 | #993 | 62 | — | |
| 1941 | #948 | 60 | — | |
| 1940 | #957 | 56 | — | |
| 1939 | #805 | 73 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,079 | 44 | — | |
| 1937 | #992 | 50 | — | |
| 1936 | #795 | 72 | — | |
| 1935 | #965 | 51 | — | |
| 1934 | #774 | 75 | — | |
| 1933 | #845 | 63 | — | |
| 1932 | #891 | 62 | — | |
| 1931 | #728 | 85 | — | |
| 1930 | #880 | 67 | — | |
| 1929 | #779 | 80 | — | |
| 1928 | #924 | 64 | — | |
| 1927 | #955 | 63 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,133 | 45 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,101 | 48 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,188 | 44 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,129 | 46 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,409 | 33 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,666 | 25 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,698 | 23 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,887 | 20 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,431 | 27 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,533 | 24 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,526 | 11 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,265 | 10 | — | |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | — | |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 | — | |
| 1910 | #2,398 | 5 | — | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1900
The first year at least five girls were named Jocelyn! It came in at #1,723, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1911, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jocelyn is popular in 2010
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Nevada#25 · 1 in 185
- California#26 · 1 in 233
- Alaska#36 · 1 in 151
- Texas#42 · 1 in 291
- South Dakota#51 · 1 in 201
Best ever in a state: #10 in California, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | #25 | 59 | 1 in 185 |
| California | #26 | 906 | 1 in 233 |
| Alaska | #36 | 16 | 1 in 151 |
| Texas | #42 | 548 | 1 in 291 |
| South Dakota | #51 | 15 | 1 in 201 |
| Oregon | #52 | 52 | 1 in 290 |
| Illinois | #53 | 200 | 1 in 304 |
| Utah | #54 | 63 | 1 in 288 |
| New Mexico | #55 | 29 | 1 in 257 |
| West Virginia | #56 | 27 | 1 in 244 |
| Arizona | #59 | 101 | 1 in 313 |
| Wisconsin | #60 | 76 | 1 in 309 |
| Idaho | #65 | 22 | 1 in 290 |
| North Dakota | #65 | 12 | 1 in 225 |
| Delaware | #69 | 12 | 1 in 223 |
| Nebraska | #74 | 25 | 1 in 315 |
| Oklahoma | #75 | 45 | 1 in 376 |
| Pennsylvania | #76 | 145 | 1 in 365 |
| North Carolina | #77 | 115 | 1 in 391 |
| District of Columbia | #78 | 12 | 1 in 248 |
| Ohio | #82 | 131 | 1 in 395 |
| Washington | #84 | 76 | 1 in 399 |
| New Hampshire | #85 | 13 | 1 in 300 |
| Minnesota | #90 | 60 | 1 in 404 |
| Virginia | #90 | 87 | 1 in 410 |
| Indiana | #92 | 71 | 1 in 427 |
| Colorado | #94 | 52 | 1 in 439 |
| Georgia | #94 | 101 | 1 in 475 |
| Florida | #98 | 163 | 1 in 488 |
| Kansas | #99 | 33 | 1 in 405 |
| New Jersey | #99 | 80 | 1 in 465 |
| Connecticut | #100 | 28 | 1 in 436 |
| Maryland | #106 | 53 | 1 in 459 |
| New York | #108 | 164 | 1 in 567 |
| Iowa | #109 | 30 | 1 in 429 |
| Massachusetts | #114 | 49 | 1 in 522 |
| South Carolina | #114 | 35 | 1 in 505 |
| Arkansas | #119 | 24 | 1 in 473 |
| Maine | #121 | 9 | 1 in 428 |
| Tennessee | #130 | 52 | 1 in 564 |
| Montana | #131 | 7 | 1 in 412 |
| Missouri | #135 | 44 | 1 in 622 |
| Kentucky | #138 | 32 | 1 in 574 |
| Michigan | #146 | 61 | 1 in 682 |
| Mississippi | #205 | 14 | 1 in 785 |
| Louisiana | #263 | 18 | 1 in 1,093 |
| Alabama | #272 | 17 | 1 in 1,113 |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jocelyn
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 4 spots since 2024 (#389 → #393)
- 124 spots since 2020 (#269 → #393)
- 260 spots since 2015 (#133 → #393)
- Biggest jump: 274 spots in 1939 (#1,079 → #805)
- Biggest drop: 233 spots in 1944 (#907 → #1,140)
Rise & fade · girls
107 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1900
- Peaked 2007 at #50 (5,293 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 12 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 12 yrs · run 2002–2013
- Top 1,000: 95 yrs · run 1948–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 363
- Highest: 1 in 363 girls born in 2007 were named Jocelyn (0.28%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,040 girls born in 2025 (0.05%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 34.0% of all girls named Jocelyn (38,389) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | #1,723 (1900) | #1,723 |
| 1910s | 142 | #1,431 (1917) | #2,051 |
| 1920s | 472 | #779 (1929) | #1,201 |
| 1930s | 642 | #728 (1931) | #875 |
| 1940s | 688 | #889 (1945) | #976 |
| 1950s | 2,966 | #458 (1956) | #540 |
| 1960s | 2,765 | #492 (1969) | #603 |
| 1970s | 5,215 | #267 (1977) | #422 |
| 1980s | 8,787 | #238 (1988) | #287 |
| 1990s | 20,884 | #122 (1997) | #157 |
| 2000s | 38,389 | #50 (2007) | #86 |
| 2010s | 26,357 | #65 (2010) | #128 |
| 2020s | 5,748 | #269 (2020) | #334 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jocelyn in 2010
girls
#65
3,997 births · 1 in 445 girls
Top girls' names in 2010
More about 2010
girls
1,777,595 girls got a published name in 2010; 1 in 445 of them was named Jocelyn, which outranked 99.7% of the 19,841 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jocelyn
Biggest movers since 2009
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.