Jolene
#666 for girls in 2025, 423 births · Last seen for boys in 1975 at #5,464
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1974 · 1,053 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 36,224since 1918
Jolene over time
Rank among girls' names. Jolene has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #666 | 423 | — | |
| 2024 | #603 | 497 | — | |
| 2023 | #544 | 555 | — | |
| 2022 | #486 | 645 | — | |
| 2021 | #455 | 687 | — | |
| 2020 | #475 | 647 | — | |
| 2019 | #450 | 693 | — | |
| 2018 | #455 | 692 | — | |
| 2017 | #460 | 691 | — | |
| 2016 | #571 | 544 | — | |
| 2015 | #734 | 384 | — | |
| 2014 | #722 | 388 | — | |
| 2013 | #918 | 277 | — | |
| 2012 | #887 | 298 | — | |
| 2011 | #915 | 284 | — | |
| 2010 | #969 | 263 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,068 | 239 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,130 | 228 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,269 | 194 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,188 | 204 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,189 | 193 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,043 | 222 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,160 | 186 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,144 | 181 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,200 | 170 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,291 | 149 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,371 | 129 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,236 | 147 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,155 | 160 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,176 | 154 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,113 | 159 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,105 | 162 | — | |
| 1993 | #918 | 208 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,046 | 176 | — | |
| 1991 | #850 | 235 | — | |
| 1990 | #793 | 254 | — | |
| 1989 | #721 | 274 | — | |
| 1988 | #556 | 389 | — | |
| 1987 | #563 | 355 | — | |
| 1986 | #553 | 368 | — | |
| 1985 | #471 | 447 | — | |
| 1984 | #395 | 545 | — | |
| 1983 | #342 | 673 | — | |
| 1982 | #316 | 768 | — | |
| 1981 | #315 | 756 | — | |
| 1980 | #337 | 718 | — | |
| 1979 | #387 | 567 | — | |
| 1978 | #342 | 632 | — | |
| 1977 | #320 | 739 | — | |
| 1976 | #301 | 766 | — | |
| 1975 | #248 | 998 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #245 | 1,053 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #561 | 293 | — | |
| 1972 | #599 | 266 | — | |
| 1971 | #557 | 321 | — | |
| 1970 | #512 | 383 | — | |
| 1969 | #512 | 364 | — | |
| 1968 | #496 | 381 | — | |
| 1967 | #481 | 388 | — | |
| 1966 | #447 | 436 | — | |
| 1965 | #447 | 451 | — | |
| 1964 | #445 | 479 | — | |
| 1963 | #419 | 533 | — | |
| 1962 | #393 | 585 | — | |
| 1961 | #378 | 650 | — | |
| 1960 | #427 | 522 | — | |
| 1959 | #395 | 573 | — | |
| 1958 | #364 | 628 | — | |
| 1957 | #368 | 609 | — | |
| 1956 | #408 | 492 | — | |
| 1955 | #382 | 531 | — | |
| 1954 | #389 | 491 | — | |
| 1953 | #443 | 376 | — | |
| 1952 | #441 | 378 | — | |
| 1951 | #424 | 390 | — | |
| 1950 | #429 | 352 | — | |
| 1949 | #454 | 310 | — | |
| 1948 | #475 | 284 | — | |
| 1947 | #472 | 302 | — | |
| 1946 | #492 | 250 | — | |
| 1945 | #526 | 194 | — | |
| 1944 | #504 | 204 | — | |
| 1943 | #563 | 180 | — | |
| 1942 | #499 | 223 | — | |
| 1941 | #478 | 214 | — | |
| 1940 | #507 | 186 | — | |
| 1939 | #492 | 184 | — | |
| 1938 | #537 | 160 | — | |
| 1937 | #575 | 137 | — | |
| 1936 | #728 | 83 | — | |
| 1935 | #693 | 93 | — | |
| 1934 | #717 | 86 | — | |
| 1933 | #709 | 84 | — | |
| 1932 | #816 | 70 | — | |
| 1931 | #953 | 53 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,052 | 49 | — | |
| 1929 | #941 | 58 | — | |
| 1928 | #994 | 56 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,669 | 25 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,541 | 28 | — | |
| 1925 | #2,378 | 15 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,409 | 15 | — | |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | — | |
| 1922 | #4,011 | 7 | — | |
| 1921 | #4,023 | 7 | — | |
| 1920 | #3,340 | 9 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | — | |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jolene! It came in at #3,869, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1918–1923, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.
Where Jolene is popular in 2011
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nevada#541 · 1 in 2,101
- Wisconsin#544 · 1 in 2,604
- Kentucky#544 · 1 in 2,626
- Indiana#557 · 1 in 2,759
- Maryland#668 · 1 in 3,426
Best ever in a state: #41 in North Dakota, 1974.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | #541 | 5 | 1 in 2,101 |
| Kentucky | #544 | 7 | 1 in 2,626 |
| Wisconsin | #544 | 9 | 1 in 2,604 |
| Indiana | #557 | 11 | 1 in 2,759 |
| Maryland | #668 | 7 | 1 in 3,426 |
| Pennsylvania | #698 | 13 | 1 in 4,062 |
| Oklahoma | #725 | 5 | 1 in 3,274 |
| Minnesota | #734 | 6 | 1 in 3,985 |
| Missouri | #735 | 7 | 1 in 3,863 |
| California | #752 | 47 | 1 in 4,418 |
| Florida | #755 | 19 | 1 in 4,185 |
| Virginia | #769 | 9 | 1 in 4,006 |
| Massachusetts | #815 | 5 | 1 in 5,108 |
| Washington | #837 | 7 | 1 in 4,316 |
| Arizona | #840 | 7 | 1 in 4,359 |
| Colorado | #870 | 5 | 1 in 4,479 |
| Illinois | #928 | 11 | 1 in 5,406 |
| Texas | #936 | 28 | 1 in 5,567 |
| New York | #1,069 | 14 | 1 in 6,626 |
| North Carolina | #1,150 | 6 | 1 in 7,359 |
| Ohio | #1,207 | 6 | 1 in 8,600 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jolene
- 63 spots since 2024 (#603 → #666)
- 191 spots since 2020 (#475 → #666)
- 68 spots since 2015 (#734 → #666)
- Biggest jump: 675 spots in 1928 (#1,669 → #994)
- Biggest drop: 196 spots in 1992 (#850 → #1,046)
- Debuted 1918
- Peaked 1974 at #245 (1,053 births)
- Births halved by 1985, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 80 yrs · run 1931–1991
- Highest: 1 in 1,394 girls born in 1974 were named Jolene (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,800 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 16.6% of all girls named Jolene (6,018) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 14 | #3,817 (1919) | #3,843 |
| 1920s | 226 | #941 (1929) | #2,568 |
| 1930s | 999 | #492 (1939) | #727 |
| 1940s | 2,347 | #454 (1949) | #497 |
| 1950s | 4,820 | #364 (1958) | #404 |
| 1960s | 4,789 | #378 (1961) | #445 |
| 1970s | 6,018 | #245 (1974) | #407 |
| 1980s | 5,293 | #315 (1981) | #457 |
| 1990s | 1,784 | #793 (1990) | #1,076 |
| 2000s | 1,966 | #1,043 (2004) | #1,168 |
| 2010s | 4,514 | #450 (2019) | #708 |
| 2020s | 3,454 | #455 (2021) | #538 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jolene in 2011
Top girls' names in 2011
More about 2011
girls
1,759,066 girls got a published name in 2011; 1 in 6,194 of them was named Jolene, which outranked 95.3% of the 19,590 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).