Jorge
Last seen for girls in 2012 at #14,962 · #322 for boys in 2025, 1,069 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2000 · 3,496 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 139,476since 1910
Jorge over time
Rank among boys' names. Jorge has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #322 | 1,069 | |
| 2024 | — | #285 | 1,185 | |
| 2023 | — | #277 | 1,224 | |
| 2022 | — | #283 | 1,220 | |
| 2021 | — | #278 | 1,238 | |
| 2020 | — | #276 | 1,229 | |
| 2019 | — | #265 | 1,366 | |
| 2018 | — | #262 | 1,382 | |
| 2017 | — | #238 | 1,552 | |
| 2016 | — | #225 | 1,724 | |
| 2015 | — | #225 | 1,707 | |
| 2014 | — | #209 | 1,849 | |
| 2013 | — | #208 | 1,848 | |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #195 | 1,941 |
| 2011 | — | #188 | 2,043 | |
| 2010 | — | #169 | 2,296 | |
| 2009 | — | #155 | 2,514 | |
| 2008 | — | #138 | 2,962 | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #128 | 3,269 |
| 2006 | — | #120 | 3,518 | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #118 | 3,441 |
| 2004 | #11,624 | 8 | #118 | 3,440 |
| 2003 | #9,671 | 10 | #116 | 3,483 |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | #109 | 3,458 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | #110 | 3,447 |
| 2000 | #6,808 | 15 | #107 | 3,496 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | #107 | 3,311 |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | #107 | 3,463 |
| 1997 | #5,868 | 16 | #117 | 3,231 |
| 1996 | #5,280 | 18 | #113 | 3,463 |
| 1995 | #3,670 | 29 | #114 | 3,306 |
| 1994 | #3,536 | 31 | #112 | 3,294 |
| 1993 | #4,671 | 21 | #107 | 3,392 |
| 1992 | #3,773 | 28 | #109 | 3,304 |
| 1991 | #5,181 | 18 | #112 | 3,052 |
| 1990 | #4,003 | 25 | #116 | 2,913 |
| 1989 | #4,020 | 24 | #122 | 2,705 |
| 1988 | #4,172 | 21 | #122 | 2,475 |
| 1987 | #4,660 | 17 | #128 | 2,172 |
| 1986 | #3,757 | 22 | #127 | 2,185 |
| 1985 | #3,983 | 20 | #124 | 2,294 |
| 1984 | #3,990 | 19 | #144 | 1,867 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #139 | 1,910 |
| 1982 | #3,530 | 23 | #139 | 2,026 |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 | #128 | 2,109 |
| 1980 | #3,853 | 20 | #139 | 1,998 |
| 1979 | #2,931 | 29 | #134 | 2,017 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #153 | 1,634 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #154 | 1,580 |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | #152 | 1,654 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #157 | 1,541 |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | #168 | 1,427 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #178 | 1,319 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | #194 | 1,197 |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | #207 | 1,150 |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | #221 | 1,121 |
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | #232 | 982 |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | #237 | 904 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #245 | 826 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #265 | 759 |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #292 | 657 |
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | #313 | 609 |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #296 | 678 |
| 1962 | — | #311 | 630 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #339 | 539 |
| 1960 | — | #331 | 547 | |
| 1959 | — | #363 | 464 | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #378 | 422 |
| 1957 | — | #375 | 423 | |
| 1956 | — | #389 | 371 | |
| 1955 | — | #376 | 369 | |
| 1954 | — | #384 | 344 | |
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | #426 | 273 |
| 1952 | — | #437 | 256 | |
| 1951 | — | #451 | 223 | |
| 1950 | — | #492 | 187 | |
| 1949 | — | #490 | 183 | |
| 1948 | — | #540 | 151 | |
| 1947 | — | #545 | 152 | |
| 1946 | — | #581 | 121 | |
| 1945 | — | #527 | 128 | |
| 1944 | — | #626 | 96 | |
| 1943 | — | #721 | 80 | |
| 1942 | — | #867 | 57 | |
| 1941 | — | #828 | 59 | |
| 1940 | — | #751 | 67 | |
| 1939 | — | #867 | 50 | |
| 1938 | — | #852 | 53 | |
| 1937 | — | #942 | 44 | |
| 1936 | — | #989 | 40 | |
| 1935 | — | #940 | 45 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,024 | 40 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,028 | 39 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,126 | 36 | |
| 1931 | — | #831 | 57 | |
| 1930 | — | #928 | 52 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,010 | 45 | |
| 1928 | — | #872 | 58 | |
| 1927 | — | #884 | 59 | |
| 1926 | — | #992 | 48 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,425 | 27 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,287 | 32 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,322 | 30 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,545 | 24 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,648 | 22 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,543 | 24 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,449 | 25 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,096 | 8 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,732 | 9 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,730 | 9 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,829 | 8 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,457 | 8 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,273 | 7 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | #1,118 | 9 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jorge! It came in at #1,118, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1911–1912, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jorge is popular in 2007
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arizona#58 · 1 in 245
- Texas#58 · 1 in 258
- California#63 · 1 in 269
- Nevada#112 · 1 in 410
- Florida#113 · 1 in 516
Best ever in a state: #38 in Texas, 1996.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #58 | 185 | 1 in 245 |
| Texas | #58 | 739 | 1 in 258 |
| California | #63 | 971 | 1 in 269 |
| Nevada | #112 | 39 | 1 in 410 |
| Florida | #113 | 202 | 1 in 516 |
| Colorado | #116 | 69 | 1 in 435 |
| New Jersey | #121 | 77 | 1 in 608 |
| Illinois | #126 | 138 | 1 in 560 |
| Oregon | #137 | 39 | 1 in 524 |
| New Mexico | #139 | 23 | 1 in 499 |
| Georgia | #142 | 93 | 1 in 678 |
| Washington | #150 | 56 | 1 in 663 |
| Connecticut | #162 | 20 | 1 in 829 |
| Oklahoma | #168 | 32 | 1 in 681 |
| New York | #177 | 108 | 1 in 1,026 |
| South Carolina | #177 | 28 | 1 in 820 |
| North Carolina | #189 | 60 | 1 in 936 |
| Nebraska | #192 | 15 | 1 in 711 |
| Delaware | #198 | 5 | 1 in 820 |
| Arkansas | #206 | 17 | 1 in 932 |
| District of Columbia | #206 | 6 | 1 in 760 |
| Virginia | #211 | 37 | 1 in 1,198 |
| Idaho | #214 | 11 | 1 in 851 |
| Tennessee | #233 | 31 | 1 in 1,246 |
| Utah | #244 | 22 | 1 in 1,082 |
| Massachusetts | #248 | 21 | 1 in 1,563 |
| Indiana | #260 | 29 | 1 in 1,351 |
| Iowa | #265 | 13 | 1 in 1,277 |
| Minnesota | #266 | 21 | 1 in 1,447 |
| Wisconsin | #276 | 19 | 1 in 1,572 |
| Kansas | #301 | 12 | 1 in 1,433 |
| Michigan | #311 | 29 | 1 in 1,842 |
| Kentucky | #338 | 11 | 1 in 2,196 |
| Alabama | #385 | 12 | 1 in 2,089 |
| Ohio | #425 | 21 | 1 in 3,131 |
| Maryland | #434 | 11 | 1 in 2,737 |
| Louisiana | #452 | 11 | 1 in 2,356 |
| Pennsylvania | #499 | 17 | 1 in 3,804 |
| Missouri | #591 | 8 | 1 in 4,379 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jorge
- 37 spots since 2024 (#285 → #322)
- 46 spots since 2020 (#276 → #322)
- 97 spots since 2015 (#225 → #322)
- Biggest jump: 433 spots in 1926 (#1,425 → #992)
- Biggest drop: 295 spots in 1932 (#831 → #1,126)
- Debuted 1910
- Peaked 2000 at #107 (3,496 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 15 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 96 yrs · run 1935–2025
- Highest: 1 in 547 boys born in 1996 were named Jorge (0.18%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,598 boys born in 2025 (0.06%)
- Its best rank, #107 in 2000, was only 1 in 562 (0.18%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 23.7% of all boys named Jorge (33,028) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 83 | #1,118 (1910) | #2,336 |
| 1920s | 369 | #872 (1928) | #1,253 |
| 1930s | 456 | #831 (1931) | #953 |
| 1940s | 1,094 | #490 (1949) | #648 |
| 1950s | 3,332 | #363 (1959) | #407 |
| 1960s | 7,131 | #232 (1969) | #286 |
| 1970s | 14,640 | #134 (1979) | #172 |
| 1980s | 21,741 | #122 (1989) | #131 |
| 1990s | 32,729 | #107 (1998) | #111 |
| 2000s | 33,028 | #107 (2000) | #122 |
| 2010s | 17,708 | #169 (2010) | #218 |
| 2020s | 7,165 | #276 (2020) | #287 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jorge in 2007
Top girls' names in 2007
Top boys' names in 2007
More about 2007
girls
1,922,617 girls got a published name in 2007; 1 in 384,523 of them was named Jorge, which outranked 14.3% of the 20,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 2,948 names at #17,636; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,075,414 boys got a published name in 2007; 1 in 635 of them was named Jorge, which outranked 99.1% of the 14,394 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.