Jorge
Last seen for girls in 2012 at #14,962 · #322 for boys in 2025, 1,069 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2000 · 3,496 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 139,476since 1910
Jorge over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Jorge has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #322 | 1,069 | |
| 2024 | — | #285 | 1,185 | |
| 2023 | — | #277 | 1,224 | |
| 2022 | — | #283 | 1,220 | |
| 2021 | — | #278 | 1,238 | |
| 2020 | — | #276 | 1,229 | |
| 2019 | — | #265 | 1,366 | |
| 2018 | — | #262 | 1,382 | |
| 2017 | — | #238 | 1,552 | |
| 2016 | — | #225 | 1,724 | |
| 2015 | — | #225 | 1,707 | |
| 2014 | — | #209 | 1,849 | |
| 2013 | — | #208 | 1,848 | |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #195 | 1,941 |
| 2011 | — | #188 | 2,043 | |
| 2010 | — | #169 | 2,296 | |
| 2009 | — | #155 | 2,514 | |
| 2008 | — | #138 | 2,962 | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #128 | 3,269 |
| 2006 | — | #120 | 3,518 | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | #118 | 3,441 |
| 2004 | #11,624 | 8 | #118 | 3,440 |
| 2003 | #9,671 | 10 | #116 | 3,483 |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | #109 | 3,458 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | #110 | 3,447 |
| 2000 | #6,808 | 15 | #107 | 3,496 |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | #107 | 3,311 |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | #107 | 3,463 |
| 1997 | #5,868 | 16 | #117 | 3,231 |
| 1996 | #5,280 | 18 | #113 | 3,463 |
| 1995 | #3,670 | 29 | #114 | 3,306 |
| 1994 | #3,536 | 31 | #112 | 3,294 |
| 1993 | #4,671 | 21 | #107 | 3,392 |
| 1992 | #3,773 | 28 | #109 | 3,304 |
| 1991 | #5,181 | 18 | #112 | 3,052 |
| 1990 | #4,003 | 25 | #116 | 2,913 |
| 1989 | #4,020 | 24 | #122 | 2,705 |
| 1988 | #4,172 | 21 | #122 | 2,475 |
| 1987 | #4,660 | 17 | #128 | 2,172 |
| 1986 | #3,757 | 22 | #127 | 2,185 |
| 1985 | #3,983 | 20 | #124 | 2,294 |
| 1984 | #3,990 | 19 | #144 | 1,867 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #139 | 1,910 |
| 1982 | #3,530 | 23 | #139 | 2,026 |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 | #128 | 2,109 |
| 1980 | #3,853 | 20 | #139 | 1,998 |
| 1979 | #2,931 | 29 | #134 | 2,017 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #153 | 1,634 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #154 | 1,580 |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | #152 | 1,654 |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #157 | 1,541 |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | #168 | 1,427 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #178 | 1,319 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | #194 | 1,197 |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | #207 | 1,150 |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | #221 | 1,121 |
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | #232 | 982 |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | #237 | 904 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #245 | 826 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #265 | 759 |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #292 | 657 |
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | #313 | 609 |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #296 | 678 |
| 1962 | — | #311 | 630 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #339 | 539 |
| 1960 | — | #331 | 547 | |
| 1959 | — | #363 | 464 | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #378 | 422 |
| 1957 | — | #375 | 423 | |
| 1956 | — | #389 | 371 | |
| 1955 | — | #376 | 369 | |
| 1954 | — | #384 | 344 | |
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | #426 | 273 |
| 1952 | — | #437 | 256 | |
| 1951 | — | #451 | 223 | |
| 1950 | — | #492 | 187 | |
| 1949 | — | #490 | 183 | |
| 1948 | — | #540 | 151 | |
| 1947 | — | #545 | 152 | |
| 1946 | — | #581 | 121 | |
| 1945 | — | #527 | 128 | |
| 1944 | — | #626 | 96 | |
| 1943 | — | #721 | 80 | |
| 1942 | — | #867 | 57 | |
| 1941 | — | #828 | 59 | |
| 1940 | — | #751 | 67 | |
| 1939 | — | #867 | 50 | |
| 1938 | — | #852 | 53 | |
| 1937 | — | #942 | 44 | |
| 1936 | — | #989 | 40 | |
| 1935 | — | #940 | 45 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,024 | 40 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,028 | 39 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,126 | 36 | |
| 1931 | — | #831 | 57 | |
| 1930 | — | #928 | 52 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,010 | 45 | |
| 1928 | — | #872 | 58 | |
| 1927 | — | #884 | 59 | |
| 1926 | — | #992 | 48 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,425 | 27 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,287 | 32 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,322 | 30 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,545 | 24 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,648 | 22 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,543 | 24 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,449 | 25 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,096 | 8 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,732 | 9 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,730 | 9 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,829 | 8 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,457 | 8 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,273 | 7 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | #1,118 | 9 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1910
The first year at least five boys were named Jorge! It came in at #1,118, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1911–1912, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jorge is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Texas#66 · 1 in 301
- California#80 · 1 in 344
- Nevada#81 · 1 in 293
- Arizona#85 · 1 in 338
- New Mexico#94 · 1 in 342
Best ever in a state: #38 in Texas, 1996.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #66 | 619 | 1 in 301 |
| California | #80 | 704 | 1 in 344 |
| Nevada | #81 | 49 | 1 in 293 |
| Arizona | #85 | 118 | 1 in 338 |
| New Mexico | #94 | 31 | 1 in 342 |
| Florida | #132 | 162 | 1 in 588 |
| Kansas | #161 | 27 | 1 in 620 |
| Illinois | #165 | 91 | 1 in 797 |
| Washington | #172 | 51 | 1 in 725 |
| Oregon | #173 | 30 | 1 in 644 |
| Rhode Island | #197 | 5 | 1 in 845 |
| South Carolina | #203 | 22 | 1 in 986 |
| Oklahoma | #206 | 26 | 1 in 825 |
| New Jersey | #208 | 38 | 1 in 1,174 |
| North Carolina | #208 | 54 | 1 in 997 |
| Connecticut | #220 | 13 | 1 in 1,176 |
| Colorado | #221 | 31 | 1 in 927 |
| Georgia | #223 | 52 | 1 in 1,135 |
| New York | #237 | 83 | 1 in 1,298 |
| Indiana | #247 | 29 | 1 in 1,289 |
| Utah | #251 | 22 | 1 in 1,045 |
| Maryland | #279 | 19 | 1 in 1,513 |
| Virginia | #290 | 26 | 1 in 1,621 |
| Massachusetts | #296 | 18 | 1 in 1,725 |
| Minnesota | #301 | 19 | 1 in 1,537 |
| Nebraska | #304 | 8 | 1 in 1,297 |
| Tennessee | #309 | 21 | 1 in 1,730 |
| Wisconsin | #336 | 15 | 1 in 1,913 |
| Idaho | #348 | 6 | 1 in 1,461 |
| Iowa | #349 | 9 | 1 in 1,758 |
| Mississippi | #367 | 8 | 1 in 1,863 |
| Pennsylvania | #413 | 21 | 1 in 2,958 |
| Arkansas | #420 | 7 | 1 in 2,146 |
| Michigan | #440 | 18 | 1 in 2,742 |
| Missouri | #478 | 11 | 1 in 3,042 |
| Louisiana | #512 | 9 | 1 in 2,782 |
| Kentucky | #533 | 6 | 1 in 3,905 |
| Ohio | #588 | 14 | 1 in 4,475 |
| Alabama | #595 | 6 | 1 in 4,027 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jorge
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 37 spots since 2024 (#285 → #322)
- 46 spots since 2020 (#276 → #322)
- 97 spots since 2015 (#225 → #322)
- Biggest jump: 433 spots in 1926 (#1,425 → #992)
- Biggest drop: 295 spots in 1932 (#831 → #1,126)
Rise & fade · boys
90 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1910
- Peaked 2000 at #107 (3,496 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 15 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 96 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 96 yrs · run 1935–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 547
- Highest: 1 in 547 boys born in 1996 were named Jorge (0.18%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,598 boys born in 2025 (0.06%)
- Its best rank, #107 in 2000, was only 1 in 562 (0.18%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 23.7% of all boys named Jorge (33,028) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 83 | #1,118 (1910) | #2,336 |
| 1920s | 369 | #872 (1928) | #1,253 |
| 1930s | 456 | #831 (1931) | #953 |
| 1940s | 1,094 | #490 (1949) | #648 |
| 1950s | 3,332 | #363 (1959) | #407 |
| 1960s | 7,131 | #232 (1969) | #286 |
| 1970s | 14,640 | #134 (1979) | #172 |
| 1980s | 21,741 | #122 (1989) | #131 |
| 1990s | 32,729 | #107 (1998) | #111 |
| 2000s | 33,028 | #107 (2000) | #122 |
| 2010s | 17,708 | #169 (2010) | #218 |
| 2020s | 7,165 | #276 (2020) | #287 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jorge in 2009
boys
#155
2,514 births · 1 in 789 boys
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 789 of them was named Jorge, which outranked 98.9% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Jorge
Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.