Judah
- #3,645 for girls in 2025, 41 births
- #178 for boys in 2025, 2,050 births
- Given to boys 97.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2023 · 2,101 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 35,578since 1912
Judah over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Judah has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,645 | 41 | #178 | 2,050 |
| 2024 | #3,758 | 40 | #178 | 2,092 |
| 2023 | #3,833 | 39 | #176 | 2,101 |
| 2022 | #3,220 | 50 | #180 | 2,098 |
| 2021 | #3,435 | 45 | #182 | 2,133 |
| 2020 | #3,091 | 51 | #184 | 2,109 |
| 2019 | #3,388 | 46 | #189 | 2,073 |
| 2018 | #4,144 | 34 | #201 | 2,022 |
| 2017 | #3,627 | 42 | #205 | 1,932 |
| 2016 | #4,734 | 29 | #231 | 1,681 |
| 2015 | #4,584 | 30 | #233 | 1,652 |
| 2014 | #4,269 | 34 | #239 | 1,550 |
| 2013 | #4,645 | 30 | #263 | 1,350 |
| 2012 | #5,398 | 25 | #271 | 1,307 |
| 2011 | #4,681 | 30 | #286 | 1,229 |
| 2010 | #4,860 | 29 | #295 | 1,111 |
| 2009 | #5,226 | 27 | #323 | 992 |
| 2008 | #6,559 | 20 | #392 | 771 |
| 2007 | #5,895 | 23 | #421 | 692 |
| 2006 | #5,709 | 23 | #488 | 530 |
| 2005 | #5,999 | 20 | #511 | 481 |
| 2004 | #6,489 | 18 | #558 | 411 |
| 2003 | #6,299 | 18 | #651 | 306 |
| 2002 | #7,444 | 14 | #649 | 295 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | #728 | 239 |
| 2000 | #6,808 | 15 | #809 | 199 |
| 1999 | #9,479 | 9 | #903 | 166 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #989 | 139 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #1,000 | 128 |
| 1996 | #8,812 | 9 | #1,226 | 91 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #1,123 | 104 |
| 1994 | — | #1,281 | 83 | |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | #1,358 | 71 |
| 1992 | — | #1,417 | 65 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,452 | 61 | |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #1,353 | 68 |
| 1989 | — | #1,492 | 55 | |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #1,215 | 70 |
| 1987 | — | #1,439 | 50 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,457 | 47 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,524 | 43 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,365 | 48 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,253 | 54 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,539 | 40 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,188 | 60 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,593 | 37 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,532 | 38 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,214 | 54 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,187 | 55 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,572 | 34 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,455 | 37 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,269 | 44 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,817 | 24 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,771 | 25 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,823 | 24 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,509 | 14 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,682 | 11 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,200 | 14 | |
| 1967 | — | #2,611 | 10 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,963 | 16 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,617 | 10 | |
| 1964 | — | #2,854 | 9 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,673 | 10 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,640 | 6 | |
| 1961 | — | #2,538 | 11 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,685 | 10 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,037 | 8 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,642 | 10 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,552 | 6 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,798 | 9 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,207 | 13 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,531 | 10 | |
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | #2,770 | 8 | |
| 1949 | — | #3,019 | 7 | |
| 1948 | — | #3,668 | 5 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,096 | 7 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | #2,574 | 8 | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | #3,518 | 5 | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #2,393 | 10 | |
| 1933 | — | #3,268 | 6 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,849 | 8 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,651 | 9 | |
| 1930 | — | #3,592 | 6 | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | #2,843 | 9 | |
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | #2,473 | 12 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,331 | 13 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,872 | 6 | |
| 1921 | — | #4,322 | 5 | |
| 1920 | — | #3,208 | 8 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,736 | 6 | |
| 1918 | — | #4,179 | 5 | |
| 1917 | — | #3,217 | 7 | |
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1912
The first year at least five boys were named Judah! It came in at #2,544, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1912–1916, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Judah is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #79 | 11 | 1 in 265 |
| Oklahoma | #86 | 48 | 1 in 368 |
| Tennessee | #87 | 96 | 1 in 383 |
| Virginia | #109 | 77 | 1 in 484 |
| Alaska | #110 | 7 | 1 in 325 |
| Alabama | #120 | 44 | 1 in 489 |
| New Mexico | #121 | 16 | 1 in 406 |
| Arkansas | #126 | 28 | 1 in 450 |
| South Dakota | #127 | 10 | 1 in 384 |
| North Carolina | #129 | 96 | 1 in 536 |
| Colorado | #133 | 53 | 1 in 507 |
| Missouri | #141 | 50 | 1 in 556 |
| Ohio | #141 | 97 | 1 in 542 |
| Oregon | #143 | 28 | 1 in 538 |
| Pennsylvania | #146 | 88 | 1 in 594 |
| Minnesota | #149 | 43 | 1 in 570 |
| Kansas | #151 | 25 | 1 in 562 |
| South Carolina | #157 | 37 | 1 in 573 |
| Indiana | #158 | 52 | 1 in 609 |
| Georgia | #162 | 76 | 1 in 661 |
| Washington | #162 | 52 | 1 in 631 |
| Florida | #166 | 130 | 1 in 735 |
| Nebraska | #167 | 17 | 1 in 519 |
| Maryland | #168 | 36 | 1 in 636 |
| Michigan | #169 | 59 | 1 in 681 |
| Wisconsin | #169 | 37 | 1 in 633 |
| Iowa | #175 | 24 | 1 in 576 |
| Texas | #179 | 207 | 1 in 846 |
| Kentucky | #180 | 31 | 1 in 662 |
| Arizona | #183 | 47 | 1 in 696 |
| North Dakota | #191 | 6 | 1 in 559 |
| Montana | #201 | 6 | 1 in 627 |
| Delaware | #203 | 5 | 1 in 589 |
| Connecticut | #219 | 15 | 1 in 880 |
| New Hampshire | #230 | 5 | 1 in 901 |
| Louisiana | #231 | 22 | 1 in 870 |
| New York | #237 | 83 | 1 in 1,017 |
| Mississippi | #239 | 13 | 1 in 834 |
| Illinois | #243 | 48 | 1 in 1,032 |
| West Virginia | #254 | 7 | 1 in 880 |
| New Jersey | #263 | 35 | 1 in 1,136 |
| California | #280 | 132 | 1 in 1,329 |
| Idaho | #302 | 8 | 1 in 1,079 |
| Nevada | #323 | 9 | 1 in 1,255 |
| Massachusetts | #378 | 13 | 1 in 2,079 |
| Utah | #409 | 11 | 1 in 1,788 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Judah
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- Held #178 since 2024
- 6 spots since 2020 (#184 → #178)
- Biggest jump: 226 spots in 1997
- Biggest drop: 2 spots in 2003
Rise & fade · boys
111 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1912
- Peaked 2023 at #176 (2,101 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 29 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 29 yrs · run 1997–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 814
- Highest: 1 in 814 boys born in 2023 were named Judah (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 833 boys born in 2025 (0.12%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 44.7% of all boys named Judah (15,907) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 23 | #2,544 (1912) | #3,419 |
| 1920s | 59 | #2,331 (1923) | #3,251 |
| 1930s | 44 | #2,393 (1934) | #3,045 |
| 1940s | 32 | #2,574 (1945) | #3,163 |
| 1950s | 78 | #2,207 (1954) | #2,893 |
| 1960s | 107 | #1,963 (1966) | #2,646 |
| 1970s | 349 | #1,187 (1977) | #1,615 |
| 1980s | 504 | #1,188 (1981) | #1,407 |
| 1990s | 976 | #903 (1999) | #1,210 |
| 2000s | 4,916 | #323 (2009) | #553 |
| 2010s | 15,907 | #189 (2019) | #241 |
| 2020s | 12,583 | #176 (2023) | #180 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Judah ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: