Judy

#1,872 for girls in 2025, 105 births · Last seen for boys in 1988 at #6,426
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1946 · 20,477 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
30 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
382,979
since 1880

Judy over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202018peak #11, 1946girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,872105—
2024#1,648125—
2023#1,614129—
2022#1,710122—
2021#1,680123—
2020#1,578133—
2019#1,483148—
2018#1,512144—
2017#1,614134—
2016#1,534147—
2015#1,437160—
2014#1,510146—
2013#1,457153—
2012#1,719120—
2011#2,05894—
2010#1,703123—
2009#1,889111—
2008#1,824118—
2007#1,570144—
2006#1,664127—
2005#1,451146—
2004#1,278167—
2003#1,308158—
2002#1,228163—
2001#1,253157—
2000#1,088190—
1999#1,035196—
1998#991203—
1997#927214—
1996#843236—
1995#772261—
1994#830243—
1993#764269—
1992#655341—
1991#711297—
1990#576402—
1989#594363—
1988#536408#6,4266
1987#511411#6,0896
1986#504415—
1985#462460#5,1477
1984#413514#5,5616
1983#414521#3,88410
1982#374614#6,3855
1981#381603—
1980#408549#6,2505
1979#405535—
1978#381553—
1977#348632#5,8455
1976#349614—
1975#306749#4,3097
1974#276927—
1973#2461,032#3,01311
1972#2211,261#2,99111
1971#1961,523#3,3709
1970#1771,828#2,39915
1969#1622,002#2,68211
1968#1422,269#2,57611
1967#1212,797#2,35212
1966#973,510#1,89117
1965#864,243#2,47611
1964#745,529#1,85019
1963#706,137#1,90218
1962#637,061#1,71322
1961#587,922#1,87619
1960#488,855#1,61925
1959#419,884#1,58825
1958#3610,838#1,89618
1957#3810,542#1,41131
1956#3510,197#1,67622
1955#3210,376#1,48327
1954#2911,632#1,55924
1953#2712,735#1,45527
1952#2613,632#1,74919
1951#2614,017#1,21836
1950#2514,207#1,43426
1949#2015,979#1,20535
1948#1617,706#1,02347
1947#1421,037#1,21336
1946#1120,477#1,06042
1945#1317,001#91649
1944#1217,119#83257
1943#1317,383#92352
1942#1515,667#86757
1941#1613,968#77065
1940#1611,382#98243
1939#288,081#1,07036
1938#414,992#1,55919
1937#902,741#2,19711
1936#1181,987#2,8547
1935#1431,474—
1934#184960—
1933#228727#3,6425
1932#259588#3,7765
1931#321395—
1930#341366—
1929#385302#3,9595
1928#432245—
1927#399295—
1926#368337—
1925#389312—
1924#419276—
1923#448231—
1922#459223—
1921#482205—
1920#483201—
1919#524169—
1918#594143—
1917#582136—
1916#626117—
1915#72484—
1914#70168—
1913#72152—
1912#69752—
1911#70438—
1910#79429—
1909#70632—
1908#1,04415—
1907#1,09213—
1906#1,04313—
1905#1,05713—
1904#96514—
1903#1,07611—
1902#81818—
1901#1,00711—
1900#1,10612—
1899#93512—
1898#1,00912—
1897#93112—
1896#1,5835—
1895#98611—
1894#1,0619—
1893#90111—
1892#1,2786—
1891#89310—
1890#1,0997—
1889#1,1476—
1888——
1887——
1886#7789—
1885#9216—
1884#1,0245—
1883——
1882#9085—
1881#8305—
1880#8365—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Judy was already there! It came in at #836, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1884, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Judy is popular in 2018

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedNHWashington: #1,071 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,082 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,120 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 6,691 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedWIMichigan: #1,233 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,049 girlsMINew York: #872 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 4,816 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,124 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 7,579 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedARTennessee: #1,098 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,235 girlsTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Judy, so not publishedHITexas: #1,373 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 9,348 girlsTXFlorida: #1,345 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 9,454 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New York#872 · 1 in 4,816
  2. Washington#1,071 · 1 in 6,082
  3. Tennessee#1,098 · 1 in 6,235
  4. Illinois#1,120 · 1 in 6,691
  5. California#1,124 · 1 in 7,579

Best ever in a state: #2 in Nevada, 1942.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New York#872181 in 4,816
Washington#1,07151 in 6,082
Tennessee#1,09851 in 6,235
Illinois#1,12081 in 6,691
California#1,124251 in 7,579
Michigan#1,23351 in 8,049
Florida#1,34591 in 9,454
Texas#1,373171 in 9,348
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Judy
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 224 spots since 2024 (#1,648 → #1,872)
  • 294 spots since 2020 (#1,578 → #1,872)
  • 435 spots since 2015 (#1,437 → #1,872)
  • Biggest jump: 652 spots in 1897 (#1,583 → #931)
  • Biggest drop: 597 spots in 1896 (#986 → #1,583)
Rise & fade · girls
66 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1946 at #11 (20,477 births)
  • Births halved by 1956, 10 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 30 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1937–1966
  • Top 1,000: 102 yrs · run 1909–1998
Share of babies · girls
1 in 77
  • Highest: 1 in 77 girls born in 1946 were named Judy (1.3%)
  • Latest: 1 in 15,307 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 43.8% of all girls named Judy (167,719) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s41#778 (1886)#921
1890s95#893 (1891)#1,068
1900s152#706 (1909)#991
1910s888#524 (1919)#667
1920s2,627#368 (1926)#426
1930s22,311#28 (1939)#175
1940s167,719#11 (1946)#15
1950s118,060#25 (1950)#32
1960s50,325#48 (1960)#92
1970s9,654#177 (1970)#291
1980s4,858#374 (1982)#460
1990s2,662#576 (1990)#810
2000s1,481#1,088 (2000)#1,455
2010s1,369#1,437 (2015)#1,603
2020s737#1,578 (2020)#1,684

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Judy in 2018

girls
#1,512
144 births · 1 in 11,813 girls

Top girls' names in 2018

  1. #1Emma18,824
  2. #2Olivia18,061
  3. #3Ava15,034
  4. #4Isabella14,575
  5. #5Sophia14,013
  6. #6Charlotte13,038
  7. #7Mia12,742
  8. #8Amelia12,405
  9. #9Harper10,646
  10. #10Evelyn10,433
  11. #1,512Judy144
More about 2018

girls

1,701,074 girls got a published name in 2018; 1 in 11,813 of them was named Judy, which outranked 91.7% of the 18,152 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Judy
  1. #1,506Mayra145
  2. #1,506Memphis145
  3. #1,506Rosalynn145
  4. #1,512Judy144
  5. #1,512Annistyn144
  6. #1,512Beatriz144
  7. #1,512Bentley144
  8. #1,520Ailyn143
  9. #1,520Anayah143
  10. #1,520Cielo143

Tied with 7 names at #1,512; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2017
Risers
  1. ↑ 680Meghan#1,387 → #707
  2. ↑ 567Dior#1,360 → #793
  3. ↑ 367Palmer#1,042 → #675
  4. ↑ 361Adalee#1,217 → #856
  5. ↑ 346Oaklynn#888 → #542
Fallers
  1. ↓ 334Audrina#847 → #1,181
  2. ↓ 234Courtney#952 → #1,186
  3. ↓ 232Marjorie#938 → #1,170
  4. ↓ 228Anabelle#969 → #1,197
  5. ↓ 225Angelique#799 → #1,024

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2018 →