Juelz
Last seen for girls in 2022 at #13,592 · #1,585 for boys in 2025, 107 births
Given to boys 96.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2017 · 301 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,113since 2002
Juelz over time
Rank among boys' names. Juelz has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,585 | 107 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,397 | 134 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,328 | 143 | |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | #1,209 | 164 |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | #991 | 221 |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | #831 | 276 |
| 2019 | #7,025 | 16 | #961 | 222 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | #921 | 232 |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | #777 | 301 |
| 2016 | #8,393 | 13 | #1,018 | 198 |
| 2015 | #8,931 | 12 | #993 | 207 |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | #1,070 | 181 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #907 | 229 |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | #893 | 234 |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | #1,159 | 154 |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | #1,047 | 184 |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | #966 | 207 |
| 2008 | #13,832 | 7 | #1,024 | 187 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #1,098 | 166 |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | #1,008 | 182 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #1,442 | 102 |
| 2004 | — | #2,489 | 44 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,993 | 32 | |
| 2002 | — | #9,392 | 6 | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Juelz! It came in at #9,392, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2002, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Juelz is popular in 2007
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Connecticut#392 · 1 in 2,765
- Louisiana#527 · 1 in 2,879
- South Carolina#533 · 1 in 3,280
- North Carolina#576 · 1 in 4,322
- Virginia#636 · 1 in 4,923
Best ever in a state: #213 in District of Columbia, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | #392 | 6 | 1 in 2,765 |
| Louisiana | #527 | 9 | 1 in 2,879 |
| South Carolina | #533 | 7 | 1 in 3,280 |
| North Carolina | #576 | 13 | 1 in 4,322 |
| Virginia | #636 | 9 | 1 in 4,923 |
| Ohio | #645 | 12 | 1 in 5,480 |
| Pennsylvania | #742 | 9 | 1 in 7,184 |
| New Jersey | #756 | 7 | 1 in 6,692 |
| Florida | #760 | 16 | 1 in 6,511 |
| New York | #833 | 15 | 1 in 7,385 |
| Illinois | #936 | 9 | 1 in 8,584 |
| Georgia | #1,254 | 5 | 1 in 12,618 |
| Texas | #1,517 | 9 | 1 in 21,150 |
| California | #1,843 | 8 | 1 in 32,684 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Juelz
- 188 spots since 2024 (#1,397 → #1,585)
- 754 spots since 2020 (#831 → #1,585)
- 592 spots since 2015 (#993 → #1,585)
- Biggest jump: 266 spots in 2012 (#1,159 → #893)
- Biggest drop: 218 spots in 2022 (#991 → #1,209)
- Debuted 2002
- Peaked 2017 at #777 (301 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2021
- Highest: 1 in 6,149 boys born in 2017 were named Juelz (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 15,963 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 52.1% of all boys named Juelz (2,142) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 926 | #966 (2009) | #2,552 |
| 2010s | 2,142 | #777 (2017) | #975 |
| 2020s | 1,045 | #831 (2020) | #1,224 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Juelz in 2007
Top girls' names in 2007
Top boys' names in 2007
More about 2007
girls
1,922,617 girls got a published name in 2007; 1 in 384,523 of them was named Juelz, which outranked 14.3% of the 20,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 2,948 names at #17,636; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,075,414 boys got a published name in 2007; 1 in 12,502 of them was named Juelz, which outranked 92.4% of the 14,394 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).