Julia
#131 for girls in 2025, 2,172 births · Last seen for boys in 2020 at #10,605
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 783 births
- Debut · girls
- 783 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 100 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 476,250since 1880
Julia over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #131 | 2,172 | — | |
| 2024 | #116 | 2,372 | — | |
| 2023 | #121 | 2,299 | — | |
| 2022 | #111 | 2,545 | — | |
| 2021 | #114 | 2,433 | — | |
| 2020 | #108 | 2,508 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #99 | 2,787 | — | |
| 2018 | #93 | 3,010 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #93 | 3,125 | — | |
| 2016 | #88 | 3,344 | #8,146 | 9 |
| 2015 | #89 | 3,375 | — | |
| 2014 | #86 | 3,605 | — | |
| 2013 | #75 | 3,754 | — | |
| 2012 | #65 | 3,882 | — | |
| 2011 | #58 | 4,350 | #8,079 | 9 |
| 2010 | #55 | 4,677 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #50 | 4,996 | — | |
| 2008 | #41 | 5,620 | #8,324 | 9 |
| 2007 | #34 | 6,133 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #31 | 6,884 | #6,904 | 11 |
| 2005 | #31 | 7,089 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #32 | 7,149 | #3,534 | 26 |
| 2003 | #33 | 7,437 | #4,426 | 18 |
| 2002 | #33 | 7,965 | #4,919 | 15 |
| 2001 | #27 | 8,838 | #6,013 | 11 |
| 2000 | #29 | 8,769 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #30 | 8,753 | #6,042 | 10 |
| 1998 | #32 | 8,328 | #4,413 | 15 |
| 1997 | #37 | 7,341 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #48 | 6,314 | #5,982 | 9 |
| 1995 | #62 | 5,411 | #3,854 | 16 |
| 1994 | #72 | 4,844 | #4,537 | 13 |
| 1993 | #72 | 4,663 | #3,661 | 17 |
| 1992 | #70 | 5,021 | #3,220 | 20 |
| 1991 | #67 | 5,365 | #3,224 | 19 |
| 1990 | #83 | 3,914 | #2,373 | 29 |
| 1989 | #96 | 3,370 | #1,452 | 57 |
| 1988 | #88 | 3,359 | #2,197 | 28 |
| 1987 | #86 | 3,331 | #2,725 | 19 |
| 1986 | #88 | 3,109 | #2,096 | 27 |
| 1985 | #85 | 3,206 | #1,866 | 31 |
| 1984 | #87 | 3,359 | #2,437 | 20 |
| 1983 | #85 | 3,381 | #2,408 | 20 |
| 1982 | #84 | 3,502 | #2,269 | 22 |
| 1981 | #88 | 3,668 | #2,138 | 24 |
| 1980 | #98 | 3,069 | #2,213 | 23 |
| 1979 | #122 | 2,568 | #3,569 | 11 |
| 1978 | #112 | 2,593 | #2,799 | 15 |
| 1977 | #143 | 2,060 | #3,037 | 13 |
| 1976 | #141 | 1,914 | #2,417 | 18 |
| 1975 | #137 | 2,001 | #2,902 | 13 |
| 1974 | #136 | 2,068 | #3,318 | 10 |
| 1973 | #136 | 2,089 | #4,505 | 6 |
| 1972 | #131 | 2,334 | #4,441 | 6 |
| 1971 | #130 | 2,609 | #2,813 | 12 |
| 1970 | #121 | 3,178 | #2,058 | 19 |
| 1969 | #100 | 3,712 | #2,415 | 13 |
| 1968 | #113 | 2,990 | #1,731 | 21 |
| 1967 | #123 | 2,775 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1966 | #117 | 3,046 | #2,465 | 11 |
| 1965 | #123 | 3,102 | #2,270 | 13 |
| 1964 | #117 | 3,541 | #2,114 | 15 |
| 1963 | #122 | 3,569 | #1,902 | 18 |
| 1962 | #120 | 3,752 | #2,186 | 14 |
| 1961 | #116 | 3,902 | #2,322 | 13 |
| 1960 | #122 | 3,790 | #2,685 | 10 |
| 1959 | #116 | 3,940 | #1,974 | 17 |
| 1958 | #119 | 3,835 | #2,506 | 11 |
| 1957 | #122 | 3,689 | #2,190 | 14 |
| 1956 | #131 | 3,319 | #2,497 | 11 |
| 1955 | #131 | 3,287 | #1,845 | 18 |
| 1954 | #127 | 3,157 | #2,743 | 9 |
| 1953 | #124 | 2,974 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #131 | 2,781 | #2,875 | 8 |
| 1951 | #127 | 2,748 | #1,972 | 15 |
| 1950 | #119 | 2,727 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1949 | #112 | 2,922 | #2,453 | 10 |
| 1948 | #118 | 2,775 | #2,788 | 8 |
| 1947 | #116 | 2,953 | #2,169 | 13 |
| 1946 | #114 | 2,797 | #3,173 | 6 |
| 1945 | #115 | 2,328 | #1,772 | 15 |
| 1944 | #102 | 2,685 | #2,467 | 9 |
| 1943 | #95 | 2,972 | #1,986 | 14 |
| 1942 | #95 | 2,906 | #1,730 | 17 |
| 1941 | #88 | 2,844 | #1,821 | 15 |
| 1940 | #91 | 2,709 | #1,573 | 19 |
| 1939 | #91 | 2,635 | #1,390 | 23 |
| 1938 | #107 | 2,479 | #1,397 | 23 |
| 1937 | #112 | 2,284 | #1,372 | 24 |
| 1936 | #105 | 2,278 | #1,540 | 19 |
| 1935 | #102 | 2,341 | #1,757 | 16 |
| 1934 | #105 | 2,357 | #1,608 | 19 |
| 1933 | #97 | 2,403 | #2,093 | 12 |
| 1932 | #92 | 2,657 | #1,465 | 23 |
| 1931 | #91 | 2,624 | #1,643 | 19 |
| 1930 | #90 | 2,880 | #1,889 | 16 |
| 1929 | #88 | 2,950 | #1,237 | 32 |
| 1928 | #80 | 3,206 | #1,647 | 21 |
| 1927 | #76 | 3,586 | #2,034 | 16 |
| 1926 | #75 | 3,688 | #1,466 | 25 |
| 1925 | #65 | 4,047 | #1,745 | 20 |
| 1924 | #62 | 4,289 | #1,532 | 25 |
| 1923 | #62 | 4,323 | #1,589 | 23 |
| 1922 | #60 | 4,616 | #3,532 | 7 |
| 1921 | #58 | 4,737 | #2,152 | 15 |
| 1920 | #55 | 4,889 | #1,592 | 23 |
| 1919 | #48 | 4,950 | #1,531 | 23 |
| 1918 | #48 | 5,268 | #1,648 | 21 |
| 1917 | #47 | 5,078 | #1,437 | 24 |
| 1916 | #46 | 5,066 | #2,389 | 11 |
| 1915 | #44 | 4,831 | #2,310 | 11 |
| 1914 | #42 | 3,814 | #1,772 | 13 |
| 1913 | #42 | 3,195 | #1,497 | 13 |
| 1912 | #44 | 2,825 | #1,353 | 13 |
| 1911 | #44 | 2,158 | #1,117 | 10 |
| 1910 | #49 | 2,074 | #1,314 | 7 |
| 1909 | #45 | 1,931 | #1,440 | 5 |
| 1908 | #50 | 1,749 | #877 | 10 |
| 1907 | #49 | 1,680 | — | |
| 1906 | #48 | 1,603 | — | |
| 1905 | #47 | 1,642 | — | |
| 1904 | #49 | 1,426 | — | |
| 1903 | #48 | 1,447 | — | |
| 1902 | #46 | 1,501 | #862 | 8 |
| 1901 | #46 | 1,362 | #487 | 16 |
| 1900 | #46 | 1,766 | #1,162 | 6 |
| 1899 | #47 | 1,297 | — | |
| 1898 | #45 | 1,462 | #885 | 7 |
| 1897 | #45 | 1,380 | #1,057 | 5 |
| 1896 | #44 | 1,407 | — | |
| 1895 | #45 | 1,380 | — | |
| 1894 | #45 | 1,320 | #1,074 | 5 |
| 1893 | #40 | 1,367 | #615 | 11 |
| 1892 | #41 | 1,360 | — | |
| 1891 | #43 | 1,200 | #841 | 6 |
| 1890 | #40 | 1,275 | — | |
| 1889 | #40 | 1,201 | — | |
| 1888 | #38 | 1,292 | #917 | 6 |
| 1887 | #39 | 1,043 | #819 | 6 |
| 1886 | #36 | 1,061 | #758 | 7 |
| 1885 | #32 | 1,062 | #765 | 7 |
| 1884 | #37 | 935 | #764 | 7 |
| 1883 | #34 | 875 | — | |
| 1882 | #35 | 811 | #943 | 5 |
| 1881 | #30 | 737 | — | |
| 1880 | #26 | 783 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Julia was already there! It came in at #26, and was given to 783 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 1,100 girls a year got the name.
Where Julia is popular in 1920
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Mexico#14 · 1 in 88
- Connecticut#24 · 1 in 101
- Arizona#26 · 1 in 134
- South Carolina#28 · 1 in 132
- New Jersey#31 · 1 in 142
Best ever in a state: #2 in Connecticut, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #14 | 43 | 1 in 88 |
| Connecticut | #24 | 137 | 1 in 101 |
| Arizona | #26 | 28 | 1 in 134 |
| South Carolina | #28 | 188 | 1 in 132 |
| New Jersey | #31 | 222 | 1 in 142 |
| Pennsylvania | #33 | 653 | 1 in 149 |
| New Hampshire | #39 | 23 | 1 in 156 |
| Rhode Island | #40 | 33 | 1 in 170 |
| Georgia | #42 | 218 | 1 in 171 |
| Texas | #42 | 253 | 1 in 225 |
| New York | #44 | 496 | 1 in 199 |
| North Carolina | #44 | 199 | 1 in 188 |
| Hawaii | #45 | 17 | 1 in 175 |
| Massachusetts | #49 | 169 | 1 in 214 |
| Ohio | #54 | 246 | 1 in 225 |
| Indiana | #57 | 113 | 1 in 234 |
| Delaware | #58 | 9 | 1 in 221 |
| Mississippi | #59 | 93 | 1 in 230 |
| Virginia | #59 | 127 | 1 in 226 |
| Florida | #60 | 50 | 1 in 211 |
| Alabama | #61 | 140 | 1 in 220 |
| California | #61 | 106 | 1 in 265 |
| Vermont | #63 | 13 | 1 in 200 |
| Maryland | #67 | 55 | 1 in 271 |
| District of Columbia | #68 | 13 | 1 in 254 |
| Michigan | #68 | 144 | 1 in 262 |
| Illinois | #69 | 222 | 1 in 267 |
| Arkansas | #71 | 75 | 1 in 277 |
| Wyoming | #71 | 7 | 1 in 228 |
| Louisiana | #78 | 84 | 1 in 270 |
| West Virginia | #82 | 60 | 1 in 308 |
| Colorado | #84 | 27 | 1 in 330 |
| Kansas | #86 | 50 | 1 in 331 |
| Kentucky | #89 | 78 | 1 in 371 |
| Wisconsin | #95 | 67 | 1 in 364 |
| Missouri | #96 | 78 | 1 in 393 |
| Maine | #97 | 19 | 1 in 356 |
| North Dakota | #97 | 22 | 1 in 342 |
| South Dakota | #97 | 19 | 1 in 357 |
| Montana | #98 | 13 | 1 in 388 |
| Minnesota | #100 | 53 | 1 in 432 |
| Tennessee | #101 | 69 | 1 in 404 |
| Utah | #106 | 14 | 1 in 364 |
| Oklahoma | #112 | 56 | 1 in 455 |
| Idaho | #113 | 10 | 1 in 435 |
| Washington | #114 | 21 | 1 in 500 |
| Oregon | #126 | 10 | 1 in 597 |
| Iowa | #142 | 31 | 1 in 718 |
| Nebraska | #155 | 15 | 1 in 844 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Julia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 15 spots since 2024 (#116 → #131)
- 23 spots since 2020 (#108 → #131)
- 42 spots since 2015 (#89 → #131)
- Biggest jump: 31 spots in 1978 (#143 → #112)
- Biggest drop: 21 spots in 1970 (#100 → #121)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #26 (783 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 100 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 100 yrs · run 1880–1933
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 116
- Highest: 1 in 116 girls born in 1880 were named Julia (0.86%)
- Latest: 1 in 740 girls born in 2025 (0.14%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 14.9% of all girls named Julia (70,880) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #26 (1880) → #143 (1977) → #27 (2001)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 9,800 | #26 (1880) | #35 |
| 1890s | 13,448 | #40 (1893) | #44 |
| 1900s | 16,107 | #45 (1909) | #47 |
| 1910s | 39,259 | #42 (1914) | #45 |
| 1920s | 40,331 | #55 (1920) | #68 |
| 1930s | 24,938 | #90 (1930) | #99 |
| 1940s | 27,891 | #88 (1941) | #105 |
| 1950s | 32,457 | #116 (1959) | #125 |
| 1960s | 34,179 | #100 (1969) | #117 |
| 1970s | 23,414 | #112 (1978) | #131 |
| 1980s | 33,354 | #84 (1982) | #89 |
| 1990s | 59,954 | #30 (1999) | #57 |
| 2000s | 70,880 | #27 (2001) | #34 |
| 2010s | 35,909 | #55 (2010) | #80 |
| 2020s | 14,329 | #108 (2020) | #117 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Julia in 1920
girls
#55
4,889 births · 1 in 245 girls
boys
#1,592
23 births · 1 in 46,276 boys
Top girls' names in 1920
Top boys' names in 1920
More about 1920
girls
1,198,289 girls got a published name in 1920; 1 in 245 of them was named Julia, which outranked 99.0% of the 5,767 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Julia
Biggest movers since 1919
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,064,356 boys got a published name in 1920; 1 in 46,276 of them was named Julia, which outranked 68.1% of the 4,989 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Julia
- #1,543Volney24
- #1,543Willy24
- #1,543Zeno24
- #1,592Julia23
- #1,592Alpha23
- #1,592Alwin23
- #1,592Amon23
- #1,642Abbott22
- #1,642Alfons22
- #1,642Apolonio22
Tied with 49 names at #1,592; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Biggest movers since 1919
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.