Juliana
- #256 for girls in 2025, 1,203 births
- Last seen for boys in 2012 at #10,770
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 2,128 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 67,748since 1881
Juliana over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Juliana has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #256 | 1,203 | — | |
| 2024 | #251 | 1,270 | — | |
| 2023 | #251 | 1,244 | — | |
| 2022 | #219 | 1,364 | — | |
| 2021 | #209 | 1,434 | — | |
| 2020 | #189 | 1,524 | — | |
| 2019 | #175 | 1,654 | — | |
| 2018 | #152 | 1,853 | — | |
| 2017 | #147 | 2,003 | — | |
| 2016 | #163 | 1,952 | — | |
| 2015 | #168 | 1,905 | — | |
| 2014 | #159 | 2,062 | — | |
| 2013 | #150 | 2,097 | — | |
| 2012 | #147 | 2,219 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #147 | 2,130 | — | |
| 2010 | #146 | 2,128 | — | |
| 2009 | #151 | 2,075 | — | |
| 2008 | #157 | 2,150 | — | |
| 2007 | #162 | 2,224 | — | |
| 2006 | #162 | 2,184 | — | |
| 2005 | #176 | 1,948 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #164 | 2,031 | — | |
| 2003 | #157 | 2,129 | — | |
| 2002 | #171 | 1,926 | — | |
| 2001 | #155 | 2,076 | — | |
| 2000 | #241 | 1,319 | — | |
| 1999 | #268 | 1,187 | — | |
| 1998 | #289 | 1,037 | — | |
| 1997 | #310 | 942 | — | |
| 1996 | #339 | 824 | — | |
| 1995 | #370 | 706 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #394 | 642 | — | |
| 1993 | #440 | 567 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #438 | 574 | — | |
| 1991 | #399 | 639 | — | |
| 1990 | #426 | 596 | — | |
| 1989 | #431 | 572 | — | |
| 1988 | #498 | 452 | — | |
| 1987 | #474 | 456 | — | |
| 1986 | #497 | 430 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #425 | 517 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #593 | 303 | — | |
| 1983 | #553 | 334 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #485 | 425 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #635 | 280 | — | |
| 1980 | #772 | 213 | — | |
| 1979 | #833 | 187 | — | |
| 1978 | #883 | 166 | — | |
| 1977 | #872 | 165 | — | |
| 1976 | #861 | 158 | — | |
| 1975 | #849 | 157 | — | |
| 1974 | #950 | 130 | — | |
| 1973 | #862 | 149 | — | |
| 1972 | #804 | 168 | — | |
| 1971 | #753 | 194 | — | |
| 1970 | #795 | 176 | — | |
| 1969 | #766 | 175 | — | |
| 1968 | #834 | 149 | — | |
| 1967 | #770 | 163 | — | |
| 1966 | #736 | 179 | — | |
| 1965 | #672 | 215 | — | |
| 1964 | #698 | 219 | — | |
| 1963 | #724 | 200 | — | |
| 1962 | #631 | 256 | — | |
| 1961 | #708 | 217 | — | |
| 1960 | #761 | 179 | — | |
| 1959 | #815 | 158 | — | |
| 1958 | #813 | 153 | — | |
| 1957 | #731 | 187 | — | |
| 1956 | #692 | 192 | — | |
| 1955 | #737 | 166 | — | |
| 1954 | #760 | 150 | — | |
| 1953 | #758 | 145 | — | |
| 1952 | #739 | 144 | — | |
| 1951 | #779 | 129 | — | |
| 1950 | #858 | 106 | — | |
| 1949 | #765 | 127 | — | |
| 1948 | #720 | 137 | — | |
| 1947 | #898 | 97 | — | |
| 1946 | #961 | 75 | — | |
| 1945 | #984 | 61 | — | |
| 1944 | #812 | 88 | — | |
| 1943 | #838 | 86 | — | |
| 1942 | #780 | 95 | — | |
| 1941 | #735 | 93 | — | |
| 1940 | #702 | 98 | — | |
| 1939 | #811 | 72 | — | |
| 1938 | #737 | 87 | — | |
| 1937 | #891 | 60 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,022 | 46 | — | |
| 1935 | #974 | 50 | — | |
| 1934 | #993 | 48 | — | |
| 1933 | #887 | 58 | — | |
| 1932 | #933 | 57 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,092 | 42 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,031 | 51 | — | |
| 1929 | #951 | 57 | — | |
| 1928 | #936 | 63 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,071 | 51 | — | |
| 1926 | #931 | 64 | — | |
| 1925 | #932 | 64 | — | |
| 1924 | #941 | 65 | — | |
| 1923 | #941 | 61 | — | |
| 1922 | #969 | 59 | — | |
| 1921 | #914 | 66 | — | |
| 1920 | #939 | 60 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,177 | 40 | — | |
| 1918 | #921 | 60 | — | |
| 1917 | #964 | 52 | — | |
| 1916 | #788 | 75 | — | |
| 1915 | #979 | 46 | — | |
| 1914 | #788 | 54 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,067 | 26 | — | |
| 1912 | #795 | 39 | — | |
| 1911 | #958 | 21 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,171 | 15 | — | |
| 1909 | #773 | 27 | — | |
| 1908 | #912 | 19 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,142 | 12 | — | |
| 1906 | #965 | 15 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,298 | 9 | — | |
| 1904 | #965 | 14 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,007 | 11 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,319 | 9 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,700 | 5 | — | |
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,123 | 9 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,175 | 7 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,017 | 9 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1890 | #940 | 9 | — | |
| 1889 | #757 | 12 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | #860 | 8 | — | |
| 1886 | #778 | 9 | — | |
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | — | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1881
The first year at least five girls were named Juliana! It came in at #830, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1885, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Juliana is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Rhode Island#103 · 1 in 307
- Alaska#134 · 1 in 331
- New Jersey#138 · 1 in 634
- Connecticut#144 · 1 in 548
- California#166 · 1 in 851
Best ever in a state: #21 in Rhode Island, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #103 | 8 | 1 in 307 |
| Alaska | #134 | 5 | 1 in 331 |
| New Jersey | #138 | 56 | 1 in 634 |
| Connecticut | #144 | 21 | 1 in 548 |
| California | #166 | 190 | 1 in 851 |
| Hawaii | #168 | 5 | 1 in 429 |
| Illinois | #191 | 53 | 1 in 836 |
| Texas | #200 | 168 | 1 in 956 |
| New York | #205 | 82 | 1 in 955 |
| Pennsylvania | #207 | 55 | 1 in 849 |
| New Mexico | #217 | 7 | 1 in 668 |
| Arizona | #219 | 31 | 1 in 910 |
| Florida | #223 | 83 | 1 in 1,045 |
| Massachusetts | #223 | 25 | 1 in 961 |
| Nevada | #235 | 11 | 1 in 836 |
| Virginia | #255 | 32 | 1 in 1,054 |
| Kansas | #256 | 12 | 1 in 984 |
| Maryland | #283 | 18 | 1 in 1,110 |
| Indiana | #305 | 23 | 1 in 1,213 |
| Michigan | #316 | 28 | 1 in 1,276 |
| Georgia | #323 | 33 | 1 in 1,370 |
| Ohio | #336 | 33 | 1 in 1,432 |
| Colorado | #354 | 17 | 1 in 1,372 |
| Washington | #356 | 20 | 1 in 1,443 |
| Louisiana | #369 | 12 | 1 in 1,364 |
| South Carolina | #373 | 13 | 1 in 1,407 |
| North Carolina | #381 | 28 | 1 in 1,660 |
| Alabama | #391 | 12 | 1 in 1,527 |
| Missouri | #418 | 14 | 1 in 1,736 |
| Minnesota | #422 | 12 | 1 in 1,790 |
| Tennessee | #432 | 18 | 1 in 1,782 |
| Oklahoma | #437 | 9 | 1 in 1,642 |
| Utah | #440 | 9 | 1 in 1,897 |
| Kentucky | #443 | 9 | 1 in 1,917 |
| Wisconsin | #484 | 10 | 1 in 2,026 |
| Iowa | #492 | 6 | 1 in 1,962 |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Juliana
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 67 spots since 2020 (#189 → #256)
- Biggest jump: 379 spots in 1889
- Biggest drop: 398 spots in 1910
Rise & fade · girls
129 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 2010 at #146 (2,128 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 119 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 119 yrs · run 1937–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 794
- Highest: 1 in 794 girls born in 2012 were named Juliana (0.13%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,336 girls born in 2025 (0.07%)
- Its best rank, #146 in 2010, was only 1 in 835 (0.12%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 29.6% of all girls named Juliana (20,062) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 45 | #757 (1889) | #901 |
| 1890s | 74 | #940 (1890) | #1,148 |
| 1900s | 131 | #773 (1909) | #1,118 |
| 1910s | 428 | #788 (1916) | #961 |
| 1920s | 610 | #914 (1921) | #953 |
| 1930s | 571 | #737 (1938) | #937 |
| 1940s | 957 | #702 (1940) | #820 |
| 1950s | 1,530 | #692 (1956) | #768 |
| 1960s | 1,952 | #631 (1962) | #730 |
| 1970s | 1,650 | #753 (1971) | #846 |
| 1980s | 3,982 | #425 (1985) | #536 |
| 1990s | 7,714 | #268 (1999) | #367 |
| 2000s | 20,062 | #151 (2009) | #170 |
| 2010s | 20,003 | #146 (2010) | #155 |
| 2020s | 8,039 | #189 (2020) | #229 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Juliana ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: