Julianna
#398 for girls in 2025, 779 births · Last seen for boys in 2013 at #10,728
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 1,751 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 52,285since 1900
Julianna over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Julianna has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #398 | 779 | — | |
| 2024 | #352 | 880 | — | |
| 2023 | #330 | 934 | — | |
| 2022 | #325 | 993 | — | |
| 2021 | #301 | 1,059 | — | |
| 2020 | #270 | 1,145 | — | |
| 2019 | #268 | 1,237 | — | |
| 2018 | #236 | 1,365 | — | |
| 2017 | #196 | 1,606 | — | |
| 2016 | #200 | 1,606 | — | |
| 2015 | #190 | 1,714 | — | |
| 2014 | #185 | 1,773 | — | |
| 2013 | #191 | 1,699 | #10,728 | 6 |
| 2012 | #187 | 1,697 | — | |
| 2011 | #179 | 1,740 | — | |
| 2010 | #176 | 1,751 | — | |
| 2009 | #190 | 1,705 | — | |
| 2008 | #194 | 1,737 | — | |
| 2007 | #186 | 1,788 | — | |
| 2006 | #194 | 1,814 | — | |
| 2005 | #214 | 1,618 | — | |
| 2004 | #200 | 1,683 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #186 | 1,734 | — | |
| 2002 | #185 | 1,748 | — | |
| 2001 | #184 | 1,777 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #249 | 1,287 | — | |
| 1999 | #260 | 1,211 | — | |
| 1998 | #259 | 1,192 | — | |
| 1997 | #299 | 964 | — | |
| 1996 | #334 | 834 | — | |
| 1995 | #407 | 640 | — | |
| 1994 | #537 | 457 | — | |
| 1993 | #598 | 390 | — | |
| 1992 | #582 | 400 | — | |
| 1991 | #505 | 467 | — | |
| 1990 | #656 | 339 | — | |
| 1989 | #569 | 390 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #631 | 315 | — | |
| 1987 | #663 | 282 | — | |
| 1986 | #650 | 283 | — | |
| 1985 | #616 | 307 | — | |
| 1984 | #838 | 184 | — | |
| 1983 | #942 | 157 | — | |
| 1982 | #794 | 203 | — | |
| 1981 | #948 | 155 | — | |
| 1980 | #995 | 147 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,036 | 134 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,104 | 118 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,088 | 119 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,055 | 116 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,012 | 119 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,033 | 116 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,012 | 116 | — | |
| 1972 | #979 | 123 | — | |
| 1971 | #984 | 128 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,060 | 115 | — | |
| 1969 | #951 | 126 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,066 | 98 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,035 | 99 | — | |
| 1966 | #999 | 105 | — | |
| 1965 | #952 | 115 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,066 | 104 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,026 | 108 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,167 | 88 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,070 | 104 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,070 | 101 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,174 | 82 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,129 | 88 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,109 | 89 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,287 | 65 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,275 | 62 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,164 | 73 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,225 | 62 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,129 | 70 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,396 | 45 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,234 | 56 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,278 | 51 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,135 | 62 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,488 | 40 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,467 | 36 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,482 | 30 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,315 | 37 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,103 | 53 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,076 | 53 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,020 | 51 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,150 | 40 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,102 | 42 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,547 | 24 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,416 | 27 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,640 | 21 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,917 | 17 | — | |
| 1934 | #2,003 | 16 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,658 | 21 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,685 | 21 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,635 | 22 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,023 | 17 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,098 | 16 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,837 | 21 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,828 | 22 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,076 | 18 | — | |
| 1925 | #2,489 | 14 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,770 | 24 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,840 | 22 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,957 | 20 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,577 | 28 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,708 | 24 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,481 | 28 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,451 | 29 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,281 | 32 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,408 | 27 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,140 | 36 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,385 | 21 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,229 | 21 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,252 | 18 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,450 | 11 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,421 | 11 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,607 | 8 | — | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 | — | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | #1,659 | 6 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | #1,466 | 6 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1900
The first year at least five girls were named Julianna! It came in at #1,723, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1902–1903, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Julianna is popular in 2015
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Rhode Island#47 · 1 in 184
- Connecticut#74 · 1 in 317
- New Jersey#84 · 1 in 408
- New York#98 · 1 in 507
- Massachusetts#120 · 1 in 527
Best ever in a state: #47 in Rhode Island, 2015.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #47 | 16 | 1 in 184 |
| Connecticut | #74 | 38 | 1 in 317 |
| New Jersey | #84 | 91 | 1 in 408 |
| New York | #98 | 180 | 1 in 507 |
| Massachusetts | #120 | 48 | 1 in 527 |
| California | #134 | 302 | 1 in 680 |
| New Mexico | #136 | 13 | 1 in 504 |
| Pennsylvania | #145 | 82 | 1 in 644 |
| Delaware | #149 | 6 | 1 in 459 |
| Florida | #153 | 119 | 1 in 722 |
| New Hampshire | #164 | 7 | 1 in 538 |
| North Dakota | #181 | 6 | 1 in 540 |
| Alaska | #182 | 5 | 1 in 487 |
| Maine | #185 | 6 | 1 in 583 |
| Nevada | #187 | 15 | 1 in 730 |
| Texas | #187 | 182 | 1 in 932 |
| Hawaii | #188 | 6 | 1 in 568 |
| Arizona | #189 | 36 | 1 in 858 |
| Virginia | #198 | 42 | 1 in 892 |
| Wisconsin | #207 | 27 | 1 in 862 |
| Illinois | #210 | 61 | 1 in 960 |
| Maryland | #224 | 26 | 1 in 927 |
| Washington | #229 | 31 | 1 in 1,011 |
| Oregon | #239 | 17 | 1 in 896 |
| Ohio | #240 | 49 | 1 in 1,077 |
| Georgia | #258 | 43 | 1 in 1,132 |
| South Carolina | #273 | 16 | 1 in 1,148 |
| Indiana | #292 | 25 | 1 in 1,225 |
| Alabama | #293 | 16 | 1 in 1,230 |
| North Carolina | #304 | 33 | 1 in 1,376 |
| Kentucky | #313 | 14 | 1 in 1,326 |
| Michigan | #328 | 27 | 1 in 1,563 |
| Minnesota | #341 | 17 | 1 in 1,439 |
| Oklahoma | #355 | 12 | 1 in 1,403 |
| Idaho | #363 | 5 | 1 in 1,293 |
| Arkansas | #394 | 8 | 1 in 1,478 |
| Colorado | #409 | 13 | 1 in 1,800 |
| Louisiana | #410 | 12 | 1 in 1,774 |
| Nebraska | #411 | 5 | 1 in 1,603 |
| Tennessee | #437 | 16 | 1 in 1,947 |
| Iowa | #467 | 7 | 1 in 1,843 |
| Kansas | #615 | 5 | 1 in 2,605 |
| Utah | #714 | 5 | 1 in 3,562 |
| Missouri | #741 | 7 | 1 in 3,885 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Julianna
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 46 spots since 2024 (#352 → #398)
- 128 spots since 2020 (#270 → #398)
- 208 spots since 2015 (#190 → #398)
- Biggest jump: 222 spots in 1985 (#838 → #616)
- Biggest drop: 148 spots in 1983 (#794 → #942)
Rise & fade · girls
110 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1900
- Peaked 2010 at #176 (1,751 births)
- Births halved by 2025, 15 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 51 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 51 yrs · run 1980–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,008
- Highest: 1 in 1,008 girls born in 2014 were named Julianna (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,063 girls born in 2025 (0.05%)
- Its best rank, #176 in 2010, was only 1 in 1,015 (0.10%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 32.3% of all girls named Julianna (16,891) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 31 | #1,466 (1901) | #1,703 |
| 1910s | 234 | #1,140 (1915) | #1,350 |
| 1920s | 209 | #1,577 (1921) | #1,918 |
| 1930s | 228 | #1,102 (1939) | #1,663 |
| 1940s | 453 | #1,020 (1941) | #1,251 |
| 1950s | 692 | #1,109 (1957) | #1,212 |
| 1960s | 1,048 | #951 (1969) | #1,040 |
| 1970s | 1,204 | #979 (1972) | #1,036 |
| 1980s | 2,423 | #569 (1989) | #765 |
| 1990s | 6,894 | #259 (1998) | #444 |
| 2000s | 16,891 | #184 (2001) | #198 |
| 2010s | 16,188 | #176 (2010) | #201 |
| 2020s | 5,790 | #270 (2020) | #329 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Julianna in 2015
girls
#190
1,714 births · 1 in 1,041 girls
Top girls' names in 2015
More about 2015
girls
1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 1,041 of them was named Julianna, which outranked 99.0% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Julianna
Biggest movers since 2014
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.