Julie
- #872 for girls in 2025, 308 births
- Last seen for boys in 2004 at #8,927
- Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1971 · 15,322 births
- Debut · girls
- 22 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 41 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 511,253since 1880
Julie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #872 | 308 | — | |
| 2024 | #762 | 369 | — | |
| 2023 | #704 | 403 | — | |
| 2022 | #715 | 409 | — | |
| 2021 | #655 | 456 | — | |
| 2020 | #614 | 475 | — | |
| 2019 | #628 | 477 | — | |
| 2018 | #592 | 517 | — | |
| 2017 | #518 | 604 | — | |
| 2016 | #481 | 650 | — | |
| 2015 | #454 | 698 | — | |
| 2014 | #411 | 782 | — | |
| 2013 | #402 | 763 | — | |
| 2012 | #384 | 819 | — | |
| 2011 | #395 | 799 | — | |
| 2010 | #387 | 823 | — | |
| 2009 | #353 | 920 | — | |
| 2008 | #335 | 994 | — | |
| 2007 | #304 | 1,120 | — | |
| 2006 | #298 | 1,112 | — | |
| 2005 | #283 | 1,181 | — | |
| 2004 | #261 | 1,239 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #242 | 1,352 | — | |
| 2002 | #218 | 1,469 | — | |
| 2001 | #225 | 1,414 | — | |
| 2000 | #190 | 1,677 | #10,349 | 5 |
| 1999 | #178 | 1,758 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #168 | 1,807 | — | |
| 1997 | #163 | 1,865 | — | |
| 1996 | #150 | 2,139 | #5,982 | 9 |
| 1995 | #141 | 2,276 | — | |
| 1994 | #129 | 2,456 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #119 | 2,735 | #5,002 | 11 |
| 1992 | #106 | 3,170 | #4,327 | 13 |
| 1991 | #98 | 3,571 | #6,519 | 7 |
| 1990 | #93 | 3,657 | #3,779 | 15 |
| 1989 | #78 | 3,942 | #2,784 | 22 |
| 1988 | #71 | 4,462 | #2,305 | 26 |
| 1987 | #65 | 4,737 | #2,272 | 25 |
| 1986 | #58 | 5,016 | #2,684 | 19 |
| 1985 | #55 | 5,761 | #2,019 | 28 |
| 1984 | #52 | 5,942 | #1,885 | 29 |
| 1983 | #46 | 6,653 | #2,140 | 24 |
| 1982 | #41 | 7,696 | #2,341 | 21 |
| 1981 | #37 | 8,567 | #1,695 | 34 |
| 1980 | #32 | 8,906 | #1,475 | 42 |
| 1979 | #29 | 9,254 | #1,407 | 44 |
| 1978 | #26 | 9,794 | #1,508 | 38 |
| 1977 | #22 | 10,204 | #1,252 | 50 |
| 1976 | #21 | 10,839 | #1,677 | 31 |
| 1975 | #18 | 11,141 | #1,146 | 54 |
| 1974 | #14 | 11,360 | #1,091 | 57 |
| 1973 | #12 | 12,785 | #1,201 | 47 |
| 1972 | #12 | 14,062 | #1,069 | 57 |
| 1971 | #10 | 15,322 | #1,165 | 49 |
| 1970 | #11 | 17,158 | #1,192 | 48 |
| 1969 | #12 | 17,739 | #1,050 | 54 |
| 1968 | #16 | 15,750 | #1,282 | 35 |
| 1967 | #16 | 15,547 | #1,165 | 41 |
| 1966 | #13 | 16,331 | #1,100 | 45 |
| 1965 | #14 | 16,987 | #1,094 | 46 |
| 1964 | #17 | 17,283 | #1,189 | 42 |
| 1963 | #22 | 16,304 | #1,485 | 28 |
| 1962 | #22 | 17,090 | #1,454 | 29 |
| 1961 | #23 | 17,040 | #1,303 | 37 |
| 1960 | #28 | 16,079 | #1,400 | 32 |
| 1959 | #26 | 16,211 | #1,522 | 27 |
| 1958 | #23 | 18,215 | #1,345 | 33 |
| 1957 | #28 | 13,631 | #1,487 | 28 |
| 1956 | #48 | 8,574 | #1,765 | 20 |
| 1955 | #67 | 6,788 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #70 | 6,275 | #2,743 | 9 |
| 1953 | #74 | 5,668 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #85 | 4,497 | #2,680 | 9 |
| 1951 | #99 | 3,686 | #3,714 | 5 |
| 1950 | #111 | 3,144 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1949 | #113 | 2,848 | #2,453 | 10 |
| 1948 | #117 | 2,794 | #2,608 | 9 |
| 1947 | #124 | 2,735 | — | |
| 1946 | #128 | 2,169 | — | |
| 1945 | #155 | 1,511 | — | |
| 1944 | #162 | 1,480 | — | |
| 1943 | #156 | 1,624 | — | |
| 1942 | #157 | 1,566 | #2,712 | 8 |
| 1941 | #168 | 1,268 | #2,083 | 12 |
| 1940 | #180 | 1,040 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #232 | 710 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #257 | 600 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #286 | 461 | — | |
| 1936 | #284 | 452 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #335 | 355 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #342 | 346 | — | |
| 1933 | #381 | 287 | #3,004 | 7 |
| 1932 | #401 | 266 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #420 | 237 | #3,390 | 6 |
| 1930 | #422 | 247 | #3,022 | 8 |
| 1929 | #449 | 217 | — | |
| 1928 | #478 | 204 | — | |
| 1927 | #494 | 199 | — | |
| 1926 | #480 | 207 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #466 | 218 | — | |
| 1924 | #503 | 197 | #3,260 | 8 |
| 1923 | #472 | 212 | — | |
| 1922 | #497 | 195 | — | |
| 1921 | #496 | 199 | — | |
| 1920 | #483 | 201 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #500 | 182 | #2,877 | 9 |
| 1918 | #469 | 202 | — | |
| 1917 | #494 | 177 | #2,956 | 8 |
| 1916 | #464 | 188 | — | |
| 1915 | #467 | 173 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #421 | 161 | #2,101 | 10 |
| 1913 | #457 | 119 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | #521 | 86 | #2,045 | 7 |
| 1911 | #483 | 73 | — | |
| 1910 | #472 | 72 | — | |
| 1909 | #500 | 56 | — | |
| 1908 | #448 | 65 | — | |
| 1907 | #486 | 54 | — | |
| 1906 | #499 | 48 | — | |
| 1905 | #447 | 57 | — | |
| 1904 | #463 | 50 | — | |
| 1903 | #514 | 39 | — | |
| 1902 | #467 | 44 | — | |
| 1901 | #530 | 33 | — | |
| 1900 | #516 | 43 | — | |
| 1899 | #507 | 34 | — | |
| 1898 | #527 | 35 | — | |
| 1897 | #449 | 43 | — | |
| 1896 | #514 | 33 | — | |
| 1895 | #547 | 29 | — | |
| 1894 | #475 | 35 | — | |
| 1893 | #464 | 33 | — | |
| 1892 | #453 | 36 | — | |
| 1891 | #457 | 31 | — | |
| 1890 | #483 | 29 | — | |
| 1889 | #405 | 36 | — | |
| 1888 | #486 | 26 | — | |
| 1887 | #512 | 19 | — | |
| 1886 | #451 | 23 | — | |
| 1885 | #484 | 19 | — | |
| 1884 | #358 | 31 | — | |
| 1883 | #375 | 24 | — | |
| 1882 | #377 | 22 | — | |
| 1881 | #346 | 22 | — | |
| 1880 | #342 | 22 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Julie was already there! It came in at #342, and was given to 22 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1885–1888, when fewer than 27 girls a year got the name.
Where Julie is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Massachusetts#395 · 1 in 1,717
- Maryland#511 · 1 in 1,999
- Kansas#578 · 1 in 2,362
- South Carolina#614 · 1 in 2,613
- Ohio#622 · 1 in 2,954
Best ever in a state: #1 in Idaho, 1958.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | #395 | 14 | 1 in 1,717 |
| Maryland | #511 | 10 | 1 in 1,999 |
| Kansas | #578 | 5 | 1 in 2,362 |
| South Carolina | #614 | 7 | 1 in 2,613 |
| Ohio | #622 | 16 | 1 in 2,954 |
| Minnesota | #659 | 7 | 1 in 3,068 |
| Indiana | #721 | 8 | 1 in 3,489 |
| Arizona | #748 | 8 | 1 in 3,527 |
| Florida | #768 | 21 | 1 in 4,132 |
| Louisiana | #776 | 5 | 1 in 3,274 |
| California | #788 | 38 | 1 in 4,256 |
| Georgia | #796 | 12 | 1 in 3,767 |
| Texas | #820 | 36 | 1 in 4,460 |
| New York | #902 | 17 | 1 in 4,608 |
| Washington | #915 | 6 | 1 in 4,810 |
| Missouri | #926 | 5 | 1 in 4,860 |
| Tennessee | #983 | 6 | 1 in 5,346 |
| Illinois | #1,014 | 8 | 1 in 5,541 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,015 | 8 | 1 in 5,836 |
| North Carolina | #1,138 | 7 | 1 in 6,640 |
| Virginia | #1,180 | 5 | 1 in 6,748 |
| Michigan | #1,210 | 5 | 1 in 7,146 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Julie
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 258 spots since 2020 (#614 → #872)
- Biggest jump: 81 spots in 1889
- Biggest drop: 126 spots in 1885
Rise & fade · girls
91 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1971 at #10 (15,322 births)
- Births halved by 1983, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 1 yr
- Top 10: 1 yr · 1971
- Top 100: 41 yrs · run 1951–1991
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 95
- Highest: 1 in 95 girls born in 1969 were named Julie (1.1%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,218 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #10 in 1971, was only 1 in 109 (0.92%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 32.5% of all girls named Julie (166,150) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 244 | #342 (1880) | #414 |
| 1890s | 338 | #449 (1897) | #488 |
| 1900s | 489 | #447 (1905) | #487 |
| 1910s | 1,433 | #421 (1914) | #475 |
| 1920s | 2,049 | #449 (1929) | #482 |
| 1930s | 3,961 | #232 (1939) | #336 |
| 1940s | 19,035 | #113 (1949) | #146 |
| 1950s | 86,689 | #23 (1958) | #63 |
| 1960s | 166,150 | #12 (1969) | #18 |
| 1970s | 121,919 | #10 (1971) | #18 |
| 1980s | 61,682 | #32 (1980) | #54 |
| 1990s | 25,434 | #93 (1990) | #135 |
| 2000s | 12,478 | #190 (2000) | #271 |
| 2010s | 6,932 | #384 (2012) | #465 |
| 2020s | 2,420 | #614 (2020) | #720 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Julie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: