Juliet
#274 for girls in 2025, 1,136 births · Last seen for boys in 2016 at #12,185
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2017 · 1,380 births
- Debut · girls
- 10 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 37,966since 1880
Juliet over time
Rank among girls' names. Juliet has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #274 | 1,136 | — | |
| 2024 | #282 | 1,122 | — | |
| 2023 | #293 | 1,063 | — | |
| 2022 | #293 | 1,076 | — | |
| 2021 | #295 | 1,078 | — | |
| 2020 | #306 | 1,038 | — | |
| 2019 | #269 | 1,231 | — | |
| 2018 | #243 | 1,348 | — | |
| 2017 | #227 | 1,380 | — | |
| 2016 | #228 | 1,397 | #12,185 | 5 |
| 2015 | #240 | 1,357 | — | |
| 2014 | #259 | 1,268 | — | |
| 2013 | #238 | 1,334 | — | |
| 2012 | #254 | 1,271 | — | |
| 2011 | #249 | 1,276 | — | |
| 2010 | #285 | 1,142 | — | |
| 2009 | #318 | 1,024 | — | |
| 2008 | #453 | 697 | — | |
| 2007 | #517 | 609 | — | |
| 2006 | #582 | 503 | — | |
| 2005 | #589 | 484 | — | |
| 2004 | #650 | 422 | — | |
| 2003 | #603 | 452 | — | |
| 2002 | #602 | 428 | — | |
| 2001 | #562 | 460 | — | |
| 2000 | #623 | 405 | — | |
| 1999 | #612 | 396 | — | |
| 1998 | #606 | 397 | — | |
| 1997 | #617 | 365 | — | |
| 1996 | #824 | 244 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,049 | 171 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,038 | 176 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,089 | 166 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,076 | 168 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,044 | 175 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,120 | 156 | — | |
| 1989 | #960 | 181 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,077 | 146 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,052 | 146 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,080 | 139 | — | |
| 1985 | #933 | 168 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,091 | 127 | — | |
| 1983 | #910 | 165 | — | |
| 1982 | #886 | 173 | — | |
| 1981 | #866 | 179 | — | |
| 1980 | #853 | 181 | — | |
| 1979 | #869 | 178 | — | |
| 1978 | #919 | 154 | — | |
| 1977 | #979 | 140 | — | |
| 1976 | #858 | 159 | — | |
| 1975 | #687 | 218 | — | |
| 1974 | #714 | 203 | — | |
| 1973 | #623 | 245 | — | |
| 1972 | #613 | 256 | — | |
| 1971 | #508 | 370 | — | |
| 1970 | #504 | 393 | — | |
| 1969 | #579 | 291 | — | |
| 1968 | #727 | 182 | — | |
| 1967 | #720 | 185 | — | |
| 1966 | #708 | 192 | — | |
| 1965 | #687 | 205 | — | |
| 1964 | #736 | 200 | — | |
| 1963 | #689 | 215 | — | |
| 1962 | #646 | 245 | — | |
| 1961 | #744 | 195 | — | |
| 1960 | #779 | 172 | — | |
| 1959 | #829 | 153 | — | |
| 1958 | #892 | 131 | — | |
| 1957 | #818 | 154 | — | |
| 1956 | #897 | 124 | — | |
| 1955 | #879 | 122 | — | |
| 1954 | #838 | 126 | — | |
| 1953 | #932 | 103 | — | |
| 1952 | #975 | 93 | — | |
| 1951 | #961 | 93 | — | |
| 1950 | #916 | 94 | — | |
| 1949 | #935 | 90 | — | |
| 1948 | #967 | 81 | — | |
| 1947 | #984 | 80 | — | |
| 1946 | #867 | 91 | — | |
| 1945 | #968 | 64 | — | |
| 1944 | #808 | 89 | — | |
| 1943 | #861 | 82 | — | |
| 1942 | #873 | 78 | — | |
| 1941 | #768 | 88 | — | |
| 1940 | #790 | 80 | — | |
| 1939 | #838 | 69 | — | |
| 1938 | #756 | 84 | — | |
| 1937 | #804 | 73 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,062 | 43 | — | |
| 1935 | #954 | 53 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,148 | 38 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,024 | 46 | — | |
| 1932 | #875 | 63 | — | |
| 1931 | #899 | 59 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,041 | 50 | — | |
| 1929 | #876 | 66 | — | |
| 1928 | #896 | 67 | — | |
| 1927 | #904 | 68 | — | |
| 1926 | #769 | 88 | — | |
| 1925 | #853 | 76 | — | |
| 1924 | #777 | 92 | — | |
| 1923 | #769 | 90 | — | |
| 1922 | #831 | 78 | — | |
| 1921 | #804 | 83 | — | |
| 1920 | #739 | 95 | — | |
| 1919 | #785 | 81 | — | |
| 1918 | #721 | 100 | — | |
| 1917 | #753 | 85 | — | |
| 1916 | #687 | 99 | — | |
| 1915 | #809 | 66 | — | |
| 1914 | #676 | 74 | — | |
| 1913 | #748 | 49 | — | |
| 1912 | #770 | 42 | — | |
| 1911 | #676 | 41 | — | |
| 1910 | #877 | 24 | — | |
| 1909 | #731 | 30 | — | |
| 1908 | #709 | 30 | — | |
| 1907 | #637 | 34 | — | |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | — | |
| 1904 | #773 | 21 | — | |
| 1903 | #896 | 15 | — | |
| 1902 | #716 | 23 | — | |
| 1901 | #795 | 17 | — | |
| 1900 | #941 | 16 | — | |
| 1899 | #791 | 17 | — | |
| 1898 | #886 | 15 | — | |
| 1897 | #715 | 19 | — | |
| 1896 | #670 | 22 | — | |
| 1895 | #703 | 20 | — | |
| 1894 | #744 | 16 | — | |
| 1893 | #901 | 11 | — | |
| 1892 | #908 | 11 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,213 | 6 | — | |
| 1890 | #693 | 15 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,025 | 7 | — | |
| 1888 | #753 | 12 | — | |
| 1887 | #693 | 11 | — | |
| 1886 | #439 | 24 | — | |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | #615 | 10 | — | |
| 1882 | #740 | 7 | — | |
| 1881 | #582 | 9 | — | |
| 1880 | #547 | 10 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Juliet was already there! It came in at #547, and was given to 10 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1891, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Juliet is popular in 1926
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#450 · 1 in 4,516
- Louisiana#454 · 1 in 3,971
- Michigan#492 · 1 in 8,188
- Pennsylvania#513 · 1 in 11,438
- New York#642 · 1 in 16,427
Best ever in a state: #78 in Rhode Island, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #450 | 8 | 1 in 4,516 |
| Louisiana | #454 | 6 | 1 in 3,971 |
| Michigan | #492 | 5 | 1 in 8,188 |
| Pennsylvania | #513 | 8 | 1 in 11,438 |
| New York | #642 | 6 | 1 in 16,427 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Juliet
- 8 spots since 2024 (#282 → #274)
- 32 spots since 2020 (#306 → #274)
- 34 spots since 2015 (#240 → #274)
- Biggest jump: 332 spots in 1890 (#1,025 → #693)
- Biggest drop: 520 spots in 1891 (#693 → #1,213)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2017 at #227 (1,380 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 130 yrs · run 1937–1983
- Highest: 1 in 1,251 girls born in 2017 were named Juliet (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,415 girls born in 2025 (0.07%)
- 34.3% of all girls named Juliet (13,004) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 112 | #439 (1886) | #672 |
| 1890s | 152 | #670 (1896) | #822 |
| 1900s | 226 | #637 (1907) | #787 |
| 1910s | 661 | #676 (1914) | #750 |
| 1920s | 803 | #739 (1920) | #822 |
| 1930s | 578 | #756 (1938) | #940 |
| 1940s | 823 | #768 (1941) | #882 |
| 1950s | 1,193 | #818 (1957) | #894 |
| 1960s | 2,082 | #579 (1969) | #702 |
| 1970s | 2,316 | #504 (1970) | #727 |
| 1980s | 1,605 | #853 (1980) | #971 |
| 1990s | 2,414 | #606 (1998) | #908 |
| 2000s | 5,484 | #318 (2009) | #550 |
| 2010s | 13,004 | #227 (2017) | #249 |
| 2020s | 6,513 | #274 (2025) | #291 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Juliet in 1926
Top girls' names in 1926
More about 1926
girls
1,185,401 girls got a published name in 1926; 1 in 13,470 of them was named Juliet, which outranked 86.3% of the 5,622 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #763Theo90
- #767Lyla89
- #767Mickey89
- #769Juliet88
- #769Adelina88
- #769Concepcion88
- #769Mathilda88
- #774Lavada87
- #774Magnolia87
- #774Maxie87
Tied with 4 names at #769; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 1,047Janell#1,795 → #748
- ↑ 389Madalyn#1,225 → #836
- ↑ 382Evangelina#1,324 → #942
- ↑ 379Carla#1,252 → #873
- ↑ 351Vilma#1,020 → #669
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.