Julieta
#285 for girls in 2025, 1,086 births
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 1,086 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,689since 1913
Julieta over time
Rank among girls' names. Julieta has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #285 | 1,086 |
| 2024 | #347 | 898 |
| 2023 | #391 | 786 |
| 2022 | #443 | 712 |
| 2021 | #620 | 478 |
| 2020 | #616 | 474 |
| 2019 | #584 | 521 |
| 2018 | #531 | 591 |
| 2017 | #606 | 499 |
| 2016 | #635 | 471 |
| 2015 | #805 | 349 |
| 2014 | #962 | 278 |
| 2013 | #1,135 | 212 |
| 2012 | #1,031 | 246 |
| 2011 | #945 | 273 |
| 2010 | #1,059 | 234 |
| 2009 | #1,198 | 209 |
| 2008 | #1,366 | 177 |
| 2007 | #1,480 | 157 |
| 2006 | #1,240 | 194 |
| 2005 | #1,227 | 185 |
| 2004 | #1,498 | 134 |
| 2003 | #1,652 | 116 |
| 2002 | #1,456 | 131 |
| 2001 | #1,438 | 131 |
| 2000 | #1,588 | 111 |
| 1999 | #1,893 | 83 |
| 1998 | #2,498 | 55 |
| 1997 | #2,309 | 58 |
| 1996 | #2,451 | 52 |
| 1995 | #2,735 | 44 |
| 1994 | #2,295 | 57 |
| 1993 | #2,725 | 44 |
| 1992 | #2,105 | 64 |
| 1991 | #2,242 | 58 |
| 1990 | #2,128 | 61 |
| 1989 | #3,045 | 35 |
| 1988 | #2,216 | 51 |
| 1987 | #2,493 | 41 |
| 1986 | #2,344 | 43 |
| 1985 | #1,975 | 55 |
| 1984 | #2,851 | 31 |
| 1983 | #2,975 | 28 |
| 1982 | #3,017 | 29 |
| 1981 | #3,532 | 23 |
| 1980 | #2,440 | 39 |
| 1979 | #2,525 | 36 |
| 1978 | #3,196 | 24 |
| 1977 | #2,780 | 29 |
| 1976 | #2,728 | 28 |
| 1975 | #2,969 | 24 |
| 1974 | #2,396 | 32 |
| 1973 | #2,064 | 39 |
| 1972 | #2,747 | 25 |
| 1971 | #2,296 | 34 |
| 1970 | #2,647 | 27 |
| 1969 | #2,296 | 31 |
| 1968 | #2,874 | 20 |
| 1967 | #2,868 | 19 |
| 1966 | #3,740 | 12 |
| 1965 | #2,605 | 22 |
| 1964 | #3,379 | 15 |
| 1963 | #2,704 | 21 |
| 1962 | #2,814 | 19 |
| 1961 | #2,250 | 28 |
| 1960 | #2,512 | 23 |
| 1959 | #2,234 | 26 |
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 |
| 1957 | #2,218 | 25 |
| 1956 | #2,389 | 22 |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 |
| 1954 | #3,157 | 13 |
| 1953 | #3,480 | 11 |
| 1952 | #2,411 | 19 |
| 1951 | #2,694 | 15 |
| 1950 | #3,423 | 10 |
| 1949 | #2,726 | 14 |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 |
| 1947 | #2,354 | 18 |
| 1946 | #2,392 | 16 |
| 1945 | #4,025 | 6 |
| 1944 | #2,027 | 18 |
| 1943 | #3,493 | 8 |
| 1942 | #2,537 | 13 |
| 1941 | #2,397 | 13 |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 |
| 1939 | #2,125 | 15 |
| 1938 | #1,650 | 22 |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 |
| 1935 | #2,575 | 11 |
| 1934 | #2,923 | 9 |
| 1933 | #1,970 | 16 |
| 1932 | #2,365 | 13 |
| 1931 | #2,307 | 13 |
| 1930 | #2,110 | 16 |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 |
| 1928 | #1,961 | 19 |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 |
| 1926 | #2,257 | 16 |
| 1925 | #2,378 | 15 |
| 1924 | #1,992 | 20 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 |
| 1922 | #3,152 | 10 |
| 1921 | #2,762 | 12 |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 |
| 1919 | #3,005 | 10 |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,258 | 8 |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Julieta! It came in at #3,187, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1913–1915, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Julieta is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oregon#688 · 1 in 3,318
- California#738 · 1 in 4,410
- Illinois#831 · 1 in 4,730
- Florida#900 · 1 in 5,380
- Colorado#901 · 1 in 4,900
Best ever in a state: #84 in Arizona, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon | #688 | 5 | 1 in 3,318 |
| California | #738 | 52 | 1 in 4,410 |
| Illinois | #831 | 14 | 1 in 4,730 |
| Florida | #900 | 16 | 1 in 5,380 |
| Colorado | #901 | 5 | 1 in 4,900 |
| Texas | #951 | 29 | 1 in 5,783 |
| Arizona | #974 | 7 | 1 in 5,213 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Julieta
- 62 spots since 2024 (#347 → #285)
- 331 spots since 2020 (#616 → #285)
- 520 spots since 2015 (#805 → #285)
- Biggest jump: 177 spots in 2022 (#620 → #443)
- Biggest drop: 86 spots in 2012 (#945 → #1,031)
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 2025 at #285 (1,086 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 13 yrs · run 2014–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,480 girls born in 2025 were named Julieta (0.07%)
- 37.9% of all girls named Julieta (4,434) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 23 | #3,005 (1919) | #3,150 |
| 1920s | 121 | #1,961 (1928) | #3,023 |
| 1930s | 143 | #1,650 (1938) | #2,237 |
| 1940s | 126 | #2,027 (1944) | #2,804 |
| 1950s | 164 | #2,218 (1957) | #2,912 |
| 1960s | 210 | #2,250 (1961) | #2,804 |
| 1970s | 298 | #2,064 (1973) | #2,635 |
| 1980s | 375 | #1,975 (1985) | #2,689 |
| 1990s | 576 | #1,893 (1999) | #2,338 |
| 2000s | 1,545 | #1,198 (2009) | #1,414 |
| 2010s | 3,674 | #531 (2018) | #829 |
| 2020s | 4,434 | #285 (2025) | #450 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Julieta in 2008
Top girls' names in 2008
More about 2008
girls
1,890,938 girls got a published name in 2008; 1 in 10,683 of them was named Julieta, which outranked 93.3% of the 20,482 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).