Juna
- #3,167 for girls in 2025, 50 births
- Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
- Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1932 · 12 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,039since 1917
Juna over time
Rank among girls' names. Juna has never cracked the top 2,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,167 | 50 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,575 | 43 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,386 | 47 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,703 | 41 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,678 | 41 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,546 | 42 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,611 | 42 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,562 | 30 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,305 | 48 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,990 | 27 | — | |
| 2015 | #4,403 | 32 | — | |
| 2014 | #5,163 | 26 | — | |
| 2013 | #4,422 | 32 | — | |
| 2012 | #5,253 | 26 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,728 | 23 | — | |
| 2010 | #6,182 | 21 | — | |
| 2009 | #7,679 | 16 | — | |
| 2008 | #7,408 | 17 | — | |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | — | |
| 2006 | #10,611 | 10 | — | |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | — | |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,580 | 14 | — | |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | — | |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | — | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | — | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | — | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | — | |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | #7,905 | 5 | |
| 1988 | #8,391 | 8 | — | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | — | |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | — | |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | — | |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #8,061 | 7 | — | |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | — | |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | — | |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | — | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | — | |
| 1950 | #5,301 | 5 | — | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | — | |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | — | |
| 1943 | #4,196 | 6 | — | |
| 1942 | #3,444 | 8 | — | |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 | — | |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | — | |
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 | — | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,857 | 9 | — | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | #3,802 | 6 | — | |
| 1933 | #3,753 | 6 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,490 | 12 | — | |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 | — | |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | — | |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,664 | 8 | — | |
| 1924 | #4,002 | 7 | — | |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | — | |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | — | |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | — | |
| 1920 | #3,598 | 8 | — | |
| 1919 | #4,814 | 5 | — | |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | — | |
| 1917 | #3,092 | 9 | — | |
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Juna! It came in at #3,092, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1935, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Juna is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#2,276 · 1 in 20,216
Best ever in a state: #1,074 in Washington, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #2,276 | 8 | 1 in 20,216 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Juna
- 408 spots since 2024 (#3,575 → #3,167)
- 379 spots since 2020 (#3,546 → #3,167)
- 1,236 spots since 2015 (#4,403 → #3,167)
- Debuted 1917
- Peaked 1932 at #2,490 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1933, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 32,145 girls born in 2025 were named Juna (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #2,490 in 1932, was only 1 in 88,929 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 29.5% of all girls named Juna (307) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 22 | #3,092 (1917) | #3,806 |
| 1920s | 75 | #3,269 (1926) | #3,774 |
| 1930s | 60 | #2,490 (1932) | #3,755 |
| 1940s | 50 | #2,762 (1944) | #3,930 |
| 1950s | 25 | #4,011 (1951) | #5,059 |
| 1960s | 25 | #5,273 (1966) | #5,979 |
| 1970s | 42 | #6,080 (1973) | #8,222 |
| 1980s | 33 | #8,047 (1983) | #8,844 |
| 1990s | 31 | #10,479 (1992) | #11,942 |
| 2000s | 105 | #7,408 (2008) | #10,501 |
| 2010s | 307 | #3,305 (2017) | #4,762 |
| 2020s | 264 | #3,167 (2025) | #3,509 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Juna ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: