Jung
- Last seen for girls in 2002 at #15,432
- Last seen for boys in 2002 at #9,392
- Given to boys 50.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1967 · 7 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 154since 1945
Jung over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | #9,392 | 6 |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | #10,349 | 5 | |
| 1999 | — | #9,912 | 5 | |
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | #9,265 | 5 | |
| 1996 | — | #7,971 | 6 | |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | — | |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #6,968 | 7 |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | #6,128 | 8 |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #6,519 | 7 |
| 1990 | — | #5,823 | 8 | |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #4,786 | 9 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | — | |
| 1986 | — | #4,130 | 10 | |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | — | |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | — | #4,499 | 8 | |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | #3,966 | 10 |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #4,842 | 7 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #5,845 | 5 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | #5,101 | 5 | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | #4,375 | 6 | |
| 1970 | — | #4,230 | 6 | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | #4,136 | 5 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,231 | 7 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | — | |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | — | |
| 1954 | #5,148 | 6 | — | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | — | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | — | |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | #3,338 | 5 | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | — | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 | — | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | — | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1945
The first year at least five boys were named Jung! It came in at #3,338, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1945–1966, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jung is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Jung in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Jung
Momentum · boys
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2002
Rise & fade · boys
22 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1945
- Peaked 1967 at #3,231 (7 births)
- Births halved by 1969, 2 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 181,445
- Highest: 1 in 181,445 boys born in 1982 were named Jung (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 323,586 boys born in 2002 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #3,231 in 1967, was only 1 in 249,116 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1980s
- 33.1% of all boys named Jung (51) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1996
- Mostly girls until 1995, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | #3,338 (1945) | #3,338 |
| 1950s | 0 | — | — |
| 1960s | 12 | #3,231 (1967) | #3,684 |
| 1970s | 29 | #4,230 (1970) | #4,879 |
| 1980s | 51 | #3,966 (1982) | #4,760 |
| 1990s | 46 | #5,823 (1990) | #7,512 |
| 2000s | 11 | #9,392 (2002) | #9,871 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jung ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: