Kacie
#1,867 for girls in 2025, 106 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #12,349
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1984 · 420 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 12,782since 1966
Kacie over time
Rank among girls' names. Kacie has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,867 | 106 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,771 | 114 | #12,349 | 5 |
| 2023 | #2,142 | 89 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #2,295 | 81 | #8,990 | 8 |
| 2021 | #2,046 | 94 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #1,818 | 108 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,802 | 113 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,677 | 124 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,854 | 110 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,865 | 110 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,554 | 141 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,692 | 124 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,705 | 122 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,583 | 137 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,633 | 132 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,584 | 138 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,374 | 173 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,281 | 194 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,166 | 218 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,197 | 202 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,139 | 205 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,030 | 226 | — | |
| 2003 | #831 | 293 | — | |
| 2002 | #787 | 299 | — | |
| 2001 | #730 | 332 | — | |
| 2000 | #634 | 395 | — | |
| 1999 | #551 | 458 | #9,912 | 5 |
| 1998 | #495 | 512 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #588 | 391 | — | |
| 1996 | #567 | 409 | — | |
| 1995 | #606 | 370 | — | |
| 1994 | #626 | 353 | — | |
| 1993 | #555 | 429 | — | |
| 1992 | #505 | 476 | — | |
| 1991 | #517 | 450 | — | |
| 1990 | #518 | 460 | — | |
| 1989 | #518 | 449 | — | |
| 1988 | #514 | 429 | — | |
| 1987 | #504 | 423 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #493 | 434 | — | |
| 1985 | #559 | 352 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #482 | 420 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #542 | 346 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #599 | 300 | — | |
| 1981 | #671 | 260 | — | |
| 1980 | #830 | 189 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,238 | 104 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,511 | 74 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,526 | 71 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,210 | 38 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,729 | 54 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,133 | 38 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,223 | 35 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,598 | 27 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,435 | 18 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | — | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kacie! It came in at #5,273, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1966–1969, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Kacie is popular in 2011
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Massachusetts#640 · 1 in 3,649
- Pennsylvania#843 · 1 in 5,281
- Georgia#1,059 · 1 in 5,964
- Ohio#1,207 · 1 in 8,600
- North Carolina#1,320 · 1 in 8,831
Best ever in a state: #106 in Hawaii, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | #640 | 7 | 1 in 3,649 |
| Pennsylvania | #843 | 10 | 1 in 5,281 |
| Georgia | #1,059 | 8 | 1 in 5,964 |
| Ohio | #1,207 | 6 | 1 in 8,600 |
| North Carolina | #1,320 | 5 | 1 in 8,831 |
| California | #1,610 | 16 | 1 in 12,977 |
| Texas | #1,613 | 13 | 1 in 11,991 |
| Illinois | #1,634 | 5 | 1 in 11,892 |
| New York | #2,209 | 5 | 1 in 18,554 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kacie
- 96 spots since 2024 (#1,771 → #1,867)
- 49 spots since 2020 (#1,818 → #1,867)
- 313 spots since 2015 (#1,554 → #1,867)
- Biggest jump: 408 spots in 1980 (#1,238 → #830)
- Biggest drop: 199 spots in 2004 (#831 → #1,030)
- Debuted 1966
- Peaked 1984 at #482 (420 births)
- Births halved by 2005, 21 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 24 yrs · run 1980–2003
- Highest: 1 in 3,451 girls born in 1998 were named Kacie (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 15,163 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #482 in 1984, was only 1 in 4,009 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 33.7% of all girls named Kacie (4,308) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24 | #5,273 (1966) | #6,267 |
| 1970s | 468 | #1,238 (1979) | #2,415 |
| 1980s | 3,602 | #482 (1984) | #571 |
| 1990s | 4,308 | #495 (1998) | #553 |
| 2000s | 2,537 | #634 (2000) | #1,017 |
| 2010s | 1,251 | #1,554 (2015) | #1,695 |
| 2020s | 592 | #1,771 (2024) | #1,990 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kacie in 2011
Top girls' names in 2011
More about 2011
girls
1,759,066 girls got a published name in 2011; 1 in 13,326 of them was named Kacie, which outranked 91.7% of the 19,590 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,619Rilee133
- #1,619Taelyn133
- #1,619Tallulah133
- #1,633Kacie132
- #1,633Adaline132
- #1,633Denisse132
- #1,633Melisa132
- #1,639Aminah131
- #1,639Analeigh131
- #1,639Issabella131
Tied with 5 names at #1,633; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.