Kailynn
#2,326 for girls in 2025, 78 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #8,921
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2011 · 290 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,732since 1985
Kailynn over time
Rank among girls' names. Kailynn has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,326 | 78 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,040 | 95 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,946 | 101 | #8,921 | 8 |
| 2022 | #1,907 | 105 | #9,823 | 7 |
| 2021 | #1,698 | 122 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,616 | 129 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,708 | 122 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,435 | 154 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,432 | 159 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,300 | 184 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,126 | 226 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,011 | 258 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,056 | 235 | — | |
| 2012 | #942 | 271 | — | |
| 2011 | #898 | 290 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,082 | 230 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,048 | 247 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,137 | 226 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,203 | 209 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,473 | 150 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,547 | 132 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,573 | 125 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,687 | 113 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,821 | 98 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,941 | 89 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,885 | 90 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,962 | 80 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,124 | 68 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,590 | 49 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,314 | 57 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,345 | 56 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,988 | 39 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,158 | 36 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,968 | 26 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,949 | 15 | — | |
| 1990 | #4,868 | 19 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,522 | 20 | — | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | — | |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 | — | |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | — | |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | — | |
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kailynn! It came in at #8,318, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1985–1986, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Kailynn is popular in 2017
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#720 · 1 in 3,149
- Alabama#796 · 1 in 3,835
- Ohio#832 · 1 in 4,707
- Tennessee#933 · 1 in 5,100
- Missouri#940 · 1 in 5,194
Best ever in a state: #284 in West Virginia, 2006.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #720 | 5 | 1 in 3,149 |
| Alabama | #796 | 5 | 1 in 3,835 |
| Ohio | #832 | 11 | 1 in 4,707 |
| Tennessee | #933 | 6 | 1 in 5,100 |
| Missouri | #940 | 5 | 1 in 5,194 |
| Washington | #946 | 6 | 1 in 5,178 |
| North Carolina | #1,003 | 8 | 1 in 5,673 |
| Arizona | #1,083 | 5 | 1 in 6,014 |
| Georgia | #1,165 | 7 | 1 in 6,732 |
| New York | #1,278 | 11 | 1 in 8,000 |
| Florida | #1,380 | 9 | 1 in 9,551 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,416 | 5 | 1 in 10,228 |
| Illinois | #1,606 | 5 | 1 in 11,109 |
| Texas | #1,863 | 11 | 1 in 14,534 |
| California | #1,881 | 12 | 1 in 16,313 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kailynn
- 286 spots since 2024 (#2,040 → #2,326)
- 710 spots since 2020 (#1,616 → #2,326)
- 1,200 spots since 2015 (#1,126 → #2,326)
- Biggest jump: 184 spots in 2011 (#1,082 → #898)
- Biggest drop: 114 spots in 2013 (#942 → #1,056)
- Debuted 1985
- Peaked 2011 at #898 (290 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 2011–2012
- Highest: 1 in 6,066 girls born in 2011 were named Kailynn (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 20,606 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 45.0% of all girls named Kailynn (2,129) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 49 | #4,522 (1989) | #7,912 |
| 1990s | 445 | #1,962 (1999) | #3,227 |
| 2000s | 1,479 | #1,048 (2009) | #1,532 |
| 2010s | 2,129 | #898 (2011) | #1,199 |
| 2020s | 630 | #1,616 (2020) | #1,922 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kailynn in 2017
Top girls' names in 2017
More about 2017
girls
1,726,461 girls got a published name in 2017; 1 in 10,858 of them was named Kailynn, which outranked 92.2% of the 18,448 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,422Reece160
- #1,422Zahara160
- #1,422Zella160
- #1,432Kailynn159
- #1,432Khalani159
- #1,432Rae159
- #1,432Susanna159
- #1,436Brisa158
- #1,436Jaleah158
- #1,436Kaycee158
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 263Julianne#919 → #1,182
- ↓ 243Milania#947 → #1,190
- ↓ 240Wendy#858 → #1,098
- ↓ 238Montserrat#808 → #1,046
- ↓ 224Nathaly#930 → #1,154
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.