Kaisley
- #1,190 for girls in 2025, 194 births
- Peak · girls
- 2020 · 360 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,771since 2006
Kaisley over time
Rank among girls' names. Kaisley has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,190 | 194 |
| 2024 | #1,180 | 203 |
| 2023 | #1,137 | 213 |
| 2022 | #1,003 | 261 |
| 2021 | #868 | 314 |
| 2020 | #755 | 360 |
| 2019 | #847 | 318 |
| 2018 | #1,075 | 236 |
| 2017 | #1,489 | 149 |
| 2016 | #1,496 | 152 |
| 2015 | #1,719 | 122 |
| 2014 | #2,442 | 74 |
| 2013 | #2,936 | 57 |
| 2012 | #3,583 | 44 |
| 2011 | #5,935 | 22 |
| 2010 | #7,217 | 17 |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 |
| 2008 | #13,832 | 7 |
| 2007 | — | |
| 2006 | #12,420 | 8 |
| 2005 | — | |
| 2004 | — | |
| 2003 | — | |
| 2002 | — | |
| 2001 | — | |
| 2000 | — | |
| 1999 | — | |
| 1998 | — | |
| 1997 | — | |
| 1996 | — | |
| 1995 | — | |
| 1994 | — | |
| 1993 | — | |
| 1992 | — | |
| 1991 | — | |
| 1990 | — | |
| 1989 | — | |
| 1988 | — | |
| 1987 | — | |
| 1986 | — | |
| 1985 | — | |
| 1984 | — | |
| 1983 | — | |
| 1982 | — | |
| 1981 | — | |
| 1980 | — | |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | — | |
| 1977 | — | |
| 1976 | — | |
| 1975 | — | |
| 1974 | — | |
| 1973 | — | |
| 1972 | — | |
| 1971 | — | |
| 1970 | — | |
| 1969 | — | |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | — | |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | — | |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | — | |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | — | |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | — | |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | — | |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Kaisley! It came in at #12,420, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2007, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Kaisley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#301 · 1 in 989
- Louisiana#369 · 1 in 1,364
- Kentucky#383 · 1 in 1,568
- Arkansas#425 · 1 in 1,513
- Tennessee#603 · 1 in 2,673
Best ever in a state: #118 in Mississippi, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #301 | 9 | 1 in 989 |
| Louisiana | #369 | 12 | 1 in 1,364 |
| Kentucky | #383 | 11 | 1 in 1,568 |
| Arkansas | #425 | 7 | 1 in 1,513 |
| Tennessee | #603 | 12 | 1 in 2,673 |
| Alabama | #633 | 7 | 1 in 2,617 |
| Georgia | #710 | 14 | 1 in 3,229 |
| South Carolina | #773 | 5 | 1 in 3,658 |
| North Carolina | #905 | 10 | 1 in 4,648 |
| Texas | #949 | 30 | 1 in 5,351 |
| Florida | #1,170 | 12 | 1 in 7,230 |
| New York | #1,830 | 6 | 1 in 13,055 |
| California | #3,095 | 5 | 1 in 32,345 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kaisley
- 435 spots since 2020 (#755 → #1,190)
- 529 spots since 2015 (#1,719 → #1,190)
- Biggest jump: 228 spots in 2019
- Biggest drop: 135 spots in 2022
- Debuted 2006
- Peaked 2020 at #755 (360 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 3 yrs · run 2019–2021
- Highest: 1 in 4,490 girls born in 2020 were named Kaisley (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,285 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 55.8% of all girls named Kaisley (1,545) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35 | #6,544 (2009) | #10,932 |
| 2010s | 1,191 | #847 (2019) | #2,874 |
| 2020s | 1,545 | #755 (2020) | #1,022 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kaisley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: