Kaiya
#992 for girls in 2025, 255 births · Last seen for boys in 2005 at #10,151
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2002 · 389 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 8,587since 1974
Kaiya over time
Rank among girls' names. Kaiya has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #992 | 255 | — | |
| 2024 | #860 | 314 | — | |
| 2023 | #798 | 353 | — | |
| 2022 | #902 | 308 | — | |
| 2021 | #945 | 279 | — | |
| 2020 | #984 | 259 | — | |
| 2019 | #997 | 259 | — | |
| 2018 | #923 | 290 | — | |
| 2017 | #952 | 277 | — | |
| 2016 | #944 | 290 | — | |
| 2015 | #884 | 312 | — | |
| 2014 | #929 | 290 | — | |
| 2013 | #964 | 261 | — | |
| 2012 | #801 | 335 | — | |
| 2011 | #794 | 341 | — | |
| 2010 | #747 | 372 | — | |
| 2009 | #792 | 358 | — | |
| 2008 | #774 | 379 | — | |
| 2007 | #813 | 353 | — | |
| 2006 | #856 | 312 | — | |
| 2005 | #767 | 346 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #870 | 282 | — | |
| 2003 | #807 | 306 | — | |
| 2002 | #650 | 389 | #4,919 | 15 |
| 2001 | #799 | 295 | #5,667 | 12 |
| 2000 | #1,188 | 168 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,560 | 108 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,819 | 85 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,070 | 68 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,398 | 54 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,285 | 34 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,615 | 30 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,108 | 37 | — | |
| 1992 | #4,686 | 21 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,633 | 29 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,623 | 29 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,893 | 25 | — | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | — | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | — | |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | — | |
| 1984 | #5,222 | 13 | — | |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | — | |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | — | |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #8,061 | 7 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | — | |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | — | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kaiya! It came in at #7,680, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1976, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Kaiya is popular in 2007
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#137 · 1 in 427
- Utah#362 · 1 in 1,509
- Minnesota#391 · 1 in 1,915
- Oregon#434 · 1 in 1,863
- Colorado#492 · 1 in 2,260
Best ever in a state: #78 in Hawaii, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #137 | 8 | 1 in 427 |
| Utah | #362 | 13 | 1 in 1,509 |
| Minnesota | #391 | 14 | 1 in 1,915 |
| Oregon | #434 | 9 | 1 in 1,863 |
| Colorado | #492 | 11 | 1 in 2,260 |
| Nevada | #517 | 6 | 1 in 2,122 |
| Maryland | #526 | 10 | 1 in 2,568 |
| Iowa | #555 | 5 | 1 in 2,787 |
| Washington | #577 | 11 | 1 in 2,845 |
| Virginia | #602 | 12 | 1 in 3,206 |
| Kansas | #609 | 5 | 1 in 2,814 |
| Wisconsin | #627 | 7 | 1 in 3,643 |
| Louisiana | #636 | 7 | 1 in 3,025 |
| Michigan | #654 | 12 | 1 in 3,809 |
| Arizona | #691 | 11 | 1 in 3,451 |
| Florida | #754 | 20 | 1 in 4,464 |
| California | #783 | 50 | 1 in 4,725 |
| Illinois | #814 | 14 | 1 in 4,838 |
| Georgia | #834 | 12 | 1 in 4,518 |
| Massachusetts | #839 | 5 | 1 in 5,551 |
| North Carolina | #908 | 9 | 1 in 5,346 |
| Indiana | #916 | 6 | 1 in 5,523 |
| Missouri | #930 | 5 | 1 in 5,929 |
| Ohio | #1,002 | 8 | 1 in 7,170 |
| Tennessee | #1,007 | 5 | 1 in 6,509 |
| New York | #1,074 | 14 | 1 in 6,982 |
| New Jersey | #1,207 | 5 | 1 in 8,240 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,400 | 5 | 1 in 11,227 |
| Texas | #1,492 | 15 | 1 in 11,277 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kaiya
- 132 spots since 2024 (#860 → #992)
- 8 spots since 2020 (#984 → #992)
- 108 spots since 2015 (#884 → #992)
- Biggest jump: 389 spots in 2001 (#1,188 → #799)
- Biggest drop: 163 spots in 2013 (#801 → #964)
- Debuted 1974
- Peaked 2002 at #650 (389 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 25 yrs · run 2001–2025
- Highest: 1 in 4,546 girls born in 2023 were named Kaiya (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 6,303 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #650 in 2002, was only 1 in 4,619 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 37.1% of all girls named Kaiya (3,188) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 26 | #7,173 (1975) | #7,840 |
| 1980s | 83 | #3,893 (1989) | #7,399 |
| 1990s | 495 | #1,560 (1999) | #2,980 |
| 2000s | 3,188 | #650 (2002) | #832 |
| 2010s | 3,027 | #747 (2010) | #894 |
| 2020s | 1,768 | #798 (2023) | #914 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kaiya in 2007
Top girls' names in 2007
More about 2007
girls
1,922,617 girls got a published name in 2007; 1 in 5,447 of them was named Kaiya, which outranked 96.1% of the 20,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).