Kaleb
- Last seen for girls in 2017 at #15,902
- #295 for boys in 2025, 1,143 births
- Given to boys 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2009 · 3,787 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 86,649since 1970
Kaleb over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Kaleb has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #295 | 1,143 | |
| 2024 | — | #279 | 1,225 | |
| 2023 | — | #271 | 1,241 | |
| 2022 | — | #259 | 1,343 | |
| 2021 | — | #243 | 1,455 | |
| 2020 | — | #231 | 1,614 | |
| 2019 | — | #213 | 1,789 | |
| 2018 | — | #207 | 1,927 | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | #184 | 2,116 |
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 | #176 | 2,261 |
| 2015 | — | #164 | 2,535 | |
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 | #146 | 2,770 |
| 2013 | — | #137 | 2,871 | |
| 2012 | #13,483 | 7 | #126 | 2,997 |
| 2011 | — | #116 | 3,344 | |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | #118 | 3,429 |
| 2009 | #10,679 | 10 | #108 | 3,787 |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | #115 | 3,710 |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #113 | 3,819 |
| 2006 | #10,611 | 10 | #115 | 3,704 |
| 2005 | — | #121 | 3,392 | |
| 2004 | #5,208 | 24 | #120 | 3,421 |
| 2003 | #10,425 | 9 | #118 | 3,403 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #111 | 3,446 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | #116 | 3,336 |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #141 | 2,743 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #159 | 2,332 |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 | #156 | 2,194 |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #185 | 1,793 |
| 1996 | #8,132 | 10 | #186 | 1,717 |
| 1995 | — | #206 | 1,435 | |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | #219 | 1,329 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #237 | 1,224 |
| 1992 | — | #280 | 1,022 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #265 | 1,023 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #304 | 835 |
| 1989 | — | #345 | 668 | |
| 1988 | — | #446 | 407 | |
| 1987 | — | #483 | 334 | |
| 1986 | — | #613 | 212 | |
| 1985 | — | #621 | 199 | |
| 1984 | — | #725 | 144 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #655 | 170 |
| 1982 | — | #692 | 157 | |
| 1981 | — | #772 | 127 | |
| 1980 | — | #804 | 119 | |
| 1979 | — | #875 | 99 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,051 | 69 | |
| 1977 | — | #954 | 80 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,267 | 48 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,505 | 35 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,983 | 22 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,716 | 13 | |
| 1972 | — | #3,152 | 10 | |
| 1971 | — | #4,907 | 5 | |
| 1970 | — | #4,230 | 6 | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1970
The first year at least five boys were named Kaleb! It came in at #4,230, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1970–1971, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Kaleb is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Florida#187 · 1 in 810
- Mississippi#201 · 1 in 722
- Nevada#201 · 1 in 753
- Arkansas#208 · 1 in 740
- Alabama#215 · 1 in 828
Best ever in a state: #29 in Mississippi, 2009.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | #187 | 118 | 1 in 810 |
| Mississippi | #201 | 15 | 1 in 722 |
| Nevada | #201 | 15 | 1 in 753 |
| Arkansas | #208 | 17 | 1 in 740 |
| Alabama | #215 | 26 | 1 in 828 |
| Maryland | #221 | 26 | 1 in 881 |
| Pennsylvania | #225 | 54 | 1 in 968 |
| Georgia | #229 | 53 | 1 in 948 |
| South Carolina | #243 | 23 | 1 in 922 |
| North Carolina | #247 | 50 | 1 in 1,029 |
| Connecticut | #249 | 13 | 1 in 1,016 |
| New Jersey | #251 | 37 | 1 in 1,075 |
| Texas | #254 | 154 | 1 in 1,137 |
| South Dakota | #257 | 5 | 1 in 769 |
| New Mexico | #270 | 7 | 1 in 929 |
| Massachusetts | #274 | 21 | 1 in 1,287 |
| Colorado | #293 | 22 | 1 in 1,221 |
| Arizona | #295 | 26 | 1 in 1,259 |
| New York | #298 | 62 | 1 in 1,362 |
| Tennessee | #311 | 28 | 1 in 1,313 |
| California | #325 | 111 | 1 in 1,581 |
| West Virginia | #330 | 5 | 1 in 1,232 |
| Wisconsin | #340 | 16 | 1 in 1,465 |
| Indiana | #350 | 21 | 1 in 1,508 |
| Louisiana | #376 | 13 | 1 in 1,472 |
| Iowa | #379 | 9 | 1 in 1,537 |
| Ohio | #380 | 29 | 1 in 1,811 |
| Virginia | #388 | 20 | 1 in 1,863 |
| Utah | #409 | 11 | 1 in 1,788 |
| Michigan | #420 | 20 | 1 in 2,010 |
| Nebraska | #432 | 5 | 1 in 1,764 |
| Washington | #446 | 16 | 1 in 2,050 |
| Illinois | #457 | 23 | 1 in 2,154 |
| Oregon | #474 | 7 | 1 in 2,151 |
| Missouri | #489 | 12 | 1 in 2,318 |
| Kentucky | #526 | 8 | 1 in 2,567 |
| Oklahoma | #552 | 7 | 1 in 2,526 |
| Kansas | #590 | 5 | 1 in 2,809 |
| Minnesota | #640 | 7 | 1 in 3,500 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kaleb
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 64 spots since 2020 (#231 → #295)
- Biggest jump: 313 spots in 1977
- Biggest drop: 97 spots in 1978
Rise & fade · boys
39 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1970
- Peaked 2009 at #108 (3,787 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 10 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 48 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 48 yrs · run 1979–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 524
- Highest: 1 in 524 boys born in 2009 were named Kaleb (0.19%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,494 boys born in 2025 (0.07%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 40.1% of all boys named Kaleb (34,761) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 387 | #875 (1979) | #2,264 |
| 1980s | 2,537 | #345 (1989) | #616 |
| 1990s | 14,904 | #156 (1998) | #220 |
| 2000s | 34,761 | #108 (2009) | #118 |
| 2010s | 26,039 | #116 (2011) | #159 |
| 2020s | 8,021 | #231 (2020) | #263 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kaleb ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: