Kaycee
- #1,299 for girls in 2025, 171 births
- #2,641 for boys in 2025, 49 births
- Given to girls 94.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1998 · 263 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 8,654since 1955
Kaycee over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,299 | 171 | #2,641 | 49 |
| 2024 | #1,378 | 164 | #2,527 | 53 |
| 2023 | #1,348 | 167 | #2,614 | 50 |
| 2022 | #1,295 | 182 | #2,717 | 48 |
| 2021 | #1,384 | 158 | #3,362 | 34 |
| 2020 | #1,373 | 158 | #5,699 | 15 |
| 2019 | #1,295 | 177 | #4,951 | 19 |
| 2018 | #1,255 | 184 | #5,770 | 15 |
| 2017 | #1,436 | 158 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #1,224 | 201 | #6,053 | 14 |
| 2015 | #1,263 | 193 | #5,999 | 14 |
| 2014 | #1,221 | 200 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #1,347 | 173 | #10,728 | 6 |
| 2012 | #1,307 | 180 | #8,158 | 9 |
| 2011 | #1,354 | 170 | #8,079 | 9 |
| 2010 | #1,165 | 208 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #1,249 | 197 | #6,802 | 12 |
| 2008 | #1,242 | 202 | #6,763 | 12 |
| 2007 | #1,292 | 189 | #5,901 | 14 |
| 2006 | #1,227 | 196 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #1,333 | 164 | #9,115 | 7 |
| 2004 | #1,302 | 164 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #1,195 | 179 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,038 | 208 | #7,055 | 9 |
| 2001 | #1,074 | 198 | #8,339 | 7 |
| 2000 | #1,006 | 210 | #5,297 | 13 |
| 1999 | #958 | 216 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | #808 | 263 | #5,466 | 11 |
| 1997 | #868 | 235 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #908 | 216 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #830 | 236 | — | |
| 1994 | #848 | 235 | #5,868 | 9 |
| 1993 | #847 | 231 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #979 | 195 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #826 | 248 | #6,519 | 7 |
| 1990 | #847 | 232 | — | |
| 1989 | #852 | 218 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #1,028 | 157 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #935 | 175 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #1,097 | 135 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,323 | 100 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,168 | 115 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,346 | 89 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,429 | 85 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,596 | 73 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,657 | 69 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,678 | 66 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #2,012 | 47 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,381 | 37 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,255 | 37 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,136 | 40 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,433 | 31 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,971 | 15 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,714 | 16 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,534 | 12 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,872 | 15 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,198 | 12 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | — | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | — | |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,309 | 13 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | — | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1955
The first year at least five girls were named Kaycee! It came in at #5,828, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1955–1956, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kaycee is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Alabama#633 · 1 in 2,617
- Utah#704 · 1 in 3,415
- Arizona#818 · 1 in 4,031
- Washington#915 · 1 in 4,810
- Missouri#926 · 1 in 4,860
Best ever in a state: #77 in Wyoming, 1989.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | #633 | 7 | 1 in 2,617 |
| Utah | #704 | 5 | 1 in 3,415 |
| Arizona | #818 | 7 | 1 in 4,031 |
| Washington | #915 | 6 | 1 in 4,810 |
| Missouri | #926 | 5 | 1 in 4,860 |
| Texas | #1,062 | 26 | 1 in 6,175 |
| Georgia | #1,075 | 8 | 1 in 5,651 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,231 | 6 | 1 in 7,781 |
| California | #1,651 | 13 | 1 in 12,440 |
| New York | #1,830 | 6 | 1 in 13,055 |
| Florida | #1,887 | 6 | 1 in 14,460 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kaycee
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 74 spots since 2020 (#1,373 → #1,299)
- 36 spots since 2015 (#1,263 → #1,299)
- Biggest jump: 176 spots in 1989
- Biggest drop: 153 spots in 1992
Rise & fade · girls
43 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1955
- Peaked 1998 at #808 (263 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 12 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 12 yrs · run 1989–1999
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,718
- Highest: 1 in 6,718 girls born in 1998 were named Kaycee (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,399 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1990s
- 26.7% of all girls named Kaycee (2,307) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 31 | #3,309 (1957) | #4,894 |
| 1960s | 33 | #4,198 (1969) | #5,992 |
| 1970s | 316 | #1,678 (1979) | #2,899 |
| 1980s | 1,216 | #852 (1989) | #1,243 |
| 1990s | 2,307 | #808 (1998) | #872 |
| 2000s | 1,907 | #1,006 (2000) | #1,196 |
| 2010s | 1,844 | #1,165 (2010) | #1,287 |
| 2020s | 1,000 | #1,295 (2022) | #1,346 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kaycee ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: