Kayla
#364 for girls in 2025, 838 births · Last seen for boys in 2019 at #12,145
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1995 · 16,087 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 30 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 346,570since 1933
Kayla over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #364 | 838 | — | |
| 2024 | #336 | 935 | — | |
| 2023 | #324 | 952 | — | |
| 2022 | #279 | 1,133 | — | |
| 2021 | #254 | 1,217 | — | |
| 2020 | #215 | 1,340 | — | |
| 2019 | #182 | 1,613 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #149 | 1,892 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #138 | 2,128 | — | |
| 2016 | #129 | 2,471 | — | |
| 2015 | #115 | 2,740 | — | |
| 2014 | #101 | 3,012 | — | |
| 2013 | #96 | 3,261 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #69 | 3,776 | — | |
| 2011 | #59 | 4,336 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #49 | 5,060 | #8,803 | 8 |
| 2009 | #35 | 5,847 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #28 | 6,835 | #8,324 | 9 |
| 2007 | #26 | 7,583 | #5,901 | 14 |
| 2006 | #26 | 8,226 | — | |
| 2005 | #25 | 8,620 | #4,326 | 20 |
| 2004 | #18 | 9,773 | #2,643 | 40 |
| 2003 | #16 | 10,957 | #3,732 | 23 |
| 2002 | #19 | 11,310 | #5,131 | 14 |
| 2001 | #17 | 11,892 | #4,476 | 17 |
| 2000 | #13 | 13,313 | #4,389 | 17 |
| 1999 | #13 | 13,292 | #3,279 | 24 |
| 1998 | #12 | 13,422 | #4,197 | 16 |
| 1997 | #12 | 13,885 | #4,451 | 14 |
| 1996 | #11 | 15,269 | #3,202 | 22 |
| 1995 | #11 | 16,087 | #3,303 | 20 |
| 1994 | #12 | 15,885 | #3,109 | 22 |
| 1993 | #16 | 15,453 | #2,865 | 24 |
| 1992 | #13 | 16,517 | #2,214 | 34 |
| 1991 | #12 | 18,545 | #2,095 | 35 |
| 1990 | #14 | 17,538 | #3,166 | 19 |
| 1989 | #20 | 14,903 | #1,658 | 47 |
| 1988 | #20 | 13,433 | #1,576 | 46 |
| 1987 | #27 | 10,576 | #2,942 | 17 |
| 1986 | #64 | 4,657 | #3,268 | 14 |
| 1985 | #109 | 2,608 | #2,942 | 16 |
| 1984 | #100 | 2,681 | #4,552 | 8 |
| 1983 | #81 | 3,527 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #133 | 2,275 | — | |
| 1981 | #581 | 317 | — | |
| 1980 | #589 | 314 | — | |
| 1979 | #673 | 256 | — | |
| 1978 | #670 | 237 | — | |
| 1977 | #692 | 226 | — | |
| 1976 | #723 | 202 | — | |
| 1975 | #766 | 185 | — | |
| 1974 | #770 | 180 | — | |
| 1973 | #862 | 149 | — | |
| 1972 | #764 | 182 | — | |
| 1971 | #828 | 167 | — | |
| 1970 | #853 | 158 | — | |
| 1969 | #728 | 192 | — | |
| 1968 | #868 | 139 | — | |
| 1967 | #876 | 135 | — | |
| 1966 | #830 | 144 | — | |
| 1965 | #819 | 147 | — | |
| 1964 | #821 | 163 | — | |
| 1963 | #837 | 156 | — | |
| 1962 | #813 | 166 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,005 | 116 | — | |
| 1960 | #934 | 130 | — | |
| 1959 | #982 | 116 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,028 | 103 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,041 | 101 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,249 | 69 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,229 | 67 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,278 | 60 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,389 | 49 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,420 | 47 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,303 | 51 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,524 | 37 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,967 | 24 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,708 | 30 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,530 | 16 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,919 | 23 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,742 | 11 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,287 | 15 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,695 | 12 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,537 | 13 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,668 | 11 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,863 | 6 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,922 | 9 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,940 | 9 | — | |
| 1937 | #3,800 | 6 | — | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | — | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | #3,753 | 6 | — | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kayla! It came in at #3,753, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1934–1936, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kayla is popular in 1972
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Idaho#224 · 1 in 947
- Louisiana#230 · 1 in 1,061
- Kansas#248 · 1 in 1,232
- Arkansas#299 · 1 in 1,636
- Oklahoma#344 · 1 in 2,038
Best ever in a state: #1 in District of Columbia, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #224 | 5 | 1 in 947 |
| Louisiana | #230 | 25 | 1 in 1,061 |
| Kansas | #248 | 10 | 1 in 1,232 |
| Arkansas | #299 | 8 | 1 in 1,636 |
| Oklahoma | #344 | 8 | 1 in 2,038 |
| Texas | #421 | 38 | 1 in 2,536 |
| Minnesota | #429 | 6 | 1 in 4,011 |
| North Carolina | #595 | 6 | 1 in 6,116 |
| Missouri | #609 | 5 | 1 in 6,256 |
| Florida | #889 | 5 | 1 in 8,896 |
| Illinois | #1,010 | 6 | 1 in 12,433 |
| California | #1,778 | 5 | 1 in 27,415 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kayla
- 28 spots since 2024 (#336 → #364)
- 149 spots since 2020 (#215 → #364)
- 249 spots since 2015 (#115 → #364)
- Biggest jump: 448 spots in 1982 (#581 → #133)
- Biggest drop: 125 spots in 1970 (#728 → #853)
- Debuted 1933
- Peaked 1995 at #11 (16,087 births)
- Births halved by 2007, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1986–2013
- Top 1,000: 66 yrs · run 1962–2025
- Highest: 1 in 101 girls born in 1991 were named Kayla (0.99%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,918 girls born in 2025 (0.05%)
- Its best rank, #11 in 1995, was only 1 in 109 (0.91%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 45.0% of all girls named Kayla (155,893) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 35 | #2,922 (1939) | #3,524 |
| 1940s | 161 | #1,708 (1948) | #2,492 |
| 1950s | 700 | #982 (1959) | #1,244 |
| 1960s | 1,488 | #728 (1969) | #853 |
| 1970s | 1,942 | #670 (1978) | #760 |
| 1980s | 55,291 | #20 (1989) | #172 |
| 1990s | 155,893 | #11 (1995) | #13 |
| 2000s | 94,356 | #13 (2000) | #22 |
| 2010s | 30,289 | #49 (2010) | #109 |
| 2020s | 6,415 | #215 (2020) | #295 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kayla in 1972
Top girls' names in 1972
More about 1972
girls
1,521,244 girls got a published name in 1972; 1 in 8,358 of them was named Kayla, which outranked 92.1% of the 9,666 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).