Kaylee
#255 for girls in 2025, 1,205 births · Last seen for boys in 2015 at #10,644
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2009 · 7,219 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 21 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 140,425since 1943
Kaylee over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #255 | 1,205 | — | |
| 2024 | #220 | 1,398 | — | |
| 2023 | #183 | 1,644 | — | |
| 2022 | #161 | 1,822 | — | |
| 2021 | #139 | 1,979 | — | |
| 2020 | #117 | 2,337 | — | |
| 2019 | #114 | 2,558 | — | |
| 2018 | #97 | 2,963 | — | |
| 2017 | #84 | 3,417 | — | |
| 2016 | #72 | 3,845 | — | |
| 2015 | #61 | 4,377 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #52 | 4,552 | #12,108 | 5 |
| 2013 | #40 | 5,127 | — | |
| 2012 | #35 | 5,629 | #7,050 | 11 |
| 2011 | #36 | 6,053 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #35 | 6,108 | #7,591 | 10 |
| 2009 | #26 | 7,219 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #31 | 6,302 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #35 | 6,050 | #8,915 | 8 |
| 2006 | #42 | 5,998 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #40 | 5,870 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #50 | 5,444 | #2,376 | 47 |
| 2003 | #53 | 5,452 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #57 | 4,983 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #66 | 4,621 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #72 | 4,493 | #6,839 | 9 |
| 1999 | #69 | 4,579 | #6,530 | 9 |
| 1998 | #86 | 3,806 | — | |
| 1997 | #107 | 3,056 | — | |
| 1996 | #110 | 2,804 | — | |
| 1995 | #127 | 2,518 | — | |
| 1994 | #154 | 2,108 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #167 | 1,886 | — | |
| 1992 | #174 | 1,752 | — | |
| 1991 | #198 | 1,494 | — | |
| 1990 | #235 | 1,211 | — | |
| 1989 | #275 | 985 | #6,941 | 6 |
| 1988 | #313 | 792 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #386 | 605 | — | |
| 1986 | #441 | 488 | — | |
| 1985 | #726 | 237 | — | |
| 1984 | #821 | 191 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,715 | 63 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,850 | 58 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,195 | 46 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,866 | 31 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,236 | 25 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,196 | 24 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,881 | 25 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,736 | 26 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,435 | 18 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,222 | 11 | — | |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | — | |
| 1966 | #4,493 | 9 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #3,879 | 12 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,533 | 9 | — | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | #5,301 | 5 | — | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | — | |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kaylee! It came in at #4,691, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1943–1959, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kaylee is popular in 1997
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#34 · 1 in 172
- Utah#36 · 1 in 183
- Montana#38 · 1 in 140
- Wyoming#46 · 1 in 145
- North Dakota#46 · 1 in 150
Best ever in a state: #9 in West Virginia, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #34 | 98 | 1 in 172 |
| Utah | #36 | 85 | 1 in 183 |
| Montana | #38 | 21 | 1 in 140 |
| North Dakota | #46 | 19 | 1 in 150 |
| Wyoming | #46 | 9 | 1 in 145 |
| Nebraska | #53 | 43 | 1 in 191 |
| South Dakota | #58 | 16 | 1 in 190 |
| Idaho | #60 | 25 | 1 in 222 |
| Oregon | #62 | 63 | 1 in 256 |
| Washington | #66 | 102 | 1 in 281 |
| Maine | #67 | 20 | 1 in 229 |
| Indiana | #69 | 109 | 1 in 301 |
| Iowa | #70 | 53 | 1 in 259 |
| West Virginia | #77 | 25 | 1 in 293 |
| Colorado | #78 | 64 | 1 in 327 |
| Ohio | #78 | 181 | 1 in 342 |
| Kentucky | #80 | 64 | 1 in 309 |
| Missouri | #81 | 89 | 1 in 332 |
| Kansas | #85 | 37 | 1 in 336 |
| Alabama | #87 | 54 | 1 in 384 |
| Arkansas | #87 | 34 | 1 in 338 |
| Tennessee | #88 | 77 | 1 in 382 |
| Minnesota | #89 | 69 | 1 in 362 |
| Vermont | #91 | 7 | 1 in 261 |
| Wisconsin | #91 | 66 | 1 in 379 |
| Florida | #92 | 175 | 1 in 419 |
| Michigan | #93 | 124 | 1 in 419 |
| Mississippi | #103 | 26 | 1 in 443 |
| Pennsylvania | #103 | 136 | 1 in 428 |
| Louisiana | #106 | 45 | 1 in 481 |
| Alaska | #110 | 7 | 1 in 362 |
| Georgia | #111 | 79 | 1 in 541 |
| New Hampshire | #113 | 12 | 1 in 409 |
| Connecticut | #122 | 30 | 1 in 514 |
| North Carolina | #123 | 70 | 1 in 572 |
| South Carolina | #125 | 30 | 1 in 537 |
| Illinois | #130 | 119 | 1 in 588 |
| Arizona | #131 | 52 | 1 in 540 |
| Nevada | #134 | 16 | 1 in 534 |
| Rhode Island | #135 | 8 | 1 in 523 |
| Massachusetts | #137 | 52 | 1 in 612 |
| Virginia | #137 | 54 | 1 in 616 |
| Texas | #145 | 215 | 1 in 651 |
| Hawaii | #161 | 7 | 1 in 535 |
| New Mexico | #168 | 14 | 1 in 591 |
| New York | #204 | 96 | 1 in 1,052 |
| California | #216 | 206 | 1 in 1,082 |
| New Jersey | #229 | 34 | 1 in 1,228 |
| Maryland | #279 | 16 | 1 in 1,478 |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kaylee
- 35 spots since 2024 (#220 → #255)
- 138 spots since 2020 (#117 → #255)
- 194 spots since 2015 (#61 → #255)
- Biggest jump: 894 spots in 1984 (#1,715 → #821)
- Biggest drop: 37 spots in 2024 (#183 → #220)
- Debuted 1943
- Peaked 2009 at #26 (7,219 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 21 yrs · run 1998–2018
- Top 1,000: 42 yrs · run 1984–2025
- Highest: 1 in 254 girls born in 2009 were named Kaylee (0.39%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,334 girls born in 2025 (0.07%)
- 40.2% of all girls named Kaylee (56,432) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | #4,691 (1943) | #4,691 |
| 1950s | 5 | #5,301 (1950) | #5,301 |
| 1960s | 73 | #3,879 (1964) | #4,719 |
| 1970s | 186 | #2,736 (1971) | #3,809 |
| 1980s | 3,496 | #275 (1989) | #1,159 |
| 1990s | 25,214 | #69 (1999) | #143 |
| 2000s | 56,432 | #26 (2009) | #47 |
| 2010s | 44,629 | #35 (2010) | #63 |
| 2020s | 10,385 | #117 (2020) | #179 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kaylee in 1997
Top girls' names in 1997
More about 1997
girls
1,740,710 girls got a published name in 1997; 1 in 570 of them was named Kaylee, which outranked 99.3% of the 16,163 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.